CMAB vs IMAB in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

August 24, 2007 updated by: AstraZeneca

Longitudinal, Randomized, Open and Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Continuous vs Intermittent Maximum Androgen Blockade (CMAB vs IMAB) With Goserelin-Bicalutamide Combination in the Treatment of Hormonal naïve With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and survival of two treatment regimens: Continuous Intermittent Maximum Androgen Blockade, using goserelin and bicalutamide in patients with prostate cancer. Primary endpoint is time to progression. Fifteen patients will be evaluated. QoL evaluation is also included.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Metepec, Mexico
        • Research Site
      • Mexico City, Mexico
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological diagnosis of D2 of Adenocarcinoma,
  • Naivety to treatment
  • Valuable bone metastasis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hematological, liver or renal toxicity Grade IV
  • Severe and active infections

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time to progression

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Safety
Quality of Life

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: AstraZeneca Mexico Medical Director, MD, AstraZeneca

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 28, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2007

Last Verified

August 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe