Short Term Relief of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Serous Otitis Media Using Intranasal Steroid Sprays

April 19, 2017 updated by: Laura Orvidas, Mayo Clinic

Short Term Relief of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Serous Otitis Media Using Intranasal Steroid Sprays: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Study

We hypothesize that intranasal steroid application will have a beneficial therapeutic effect in adults with regard to resolution of serous otitis media and/or negative middle ear pressure, as compared to placebo. We further hypothesize that the rate of spontaneous short-term resolution of otitis media wit effusion in adults treated with placebo will be relatively low (minority of patients).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Newer intranasal steroid preparations are generally safe with relatively few side effects as demonstrated in large studies dealing with allergic rhinitis.

Eustachian Tube Dysfunction (ETD) primarily refers to an absent or inadequate ability to open the eustachian tube. The term Serous Otitis Media (SOM) generally referring to an accumulation of fluid within the middle ear space, in absence of signs indicating acute infection. Commonly, this can result in a conductive hearing loss due to restriction of tympanic membrane mobility. Negative Middle Ear Pressure (NMEP) is often a precursor to the development of SOM, and has it's own effect on the acoustic properties of the middle ear, also resulting in conductive hearing loss.

Due to the lack of a single accepted medical intervention to deal with ETD and the general benign nature of this condition, it is common practice for some physicians to take a "wait and see" initial approach when this clinical entity is encountered in lieu of prescribing unproved medications. It is generally accepted that some patients with Negative Middle Ear Pressure (NMEP) and/or Serous Otitis Media (SOM) will undergo spontaneous resolution of symptoms, yet the exact resolution rates are not clearly defined.

The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study of either triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray or a sham placebo nasal spray for 6 weeks is to determine if there is improvement in a test of middle ear pressure. Neither the subjects nor the Investigator will know which of the two treatments is being used until the end of the study.

Resolution of ETD symptoms will be measured by changes in the tympanogram, a test to measure pressure within the middle ear. This measurement will be taken at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 96 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, age 0-18 years
  • Patients with serous otitis media and/or negative middle ear pressure as documented by otoscopic examination and tympanometry will be considered for enrollment
  • Pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to discontinue breast feeding, when applicable
  • Active upper respiratory infection
  • Nasopharyngeal mass
  • Chronic infectious otitis media
  • Cholesteatoma
  • Acute infectious otitis media
  • History of otologic surgery other than placement of a pressure equalizer tube in the affected ear
  • History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Mucociliary disorders
  • Craniofacial disorders/syndromes
  • Cleft palate
  • Development delay and/or symptoms suggestive of perilymph fistula

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Triamcinolone acetonide

Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray; Subjects aged 12 years or older received 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 220 micrograms) for 6 weeks duration.

Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 110 micrograms) for 6 weeks duration.

Subjects aged 12 years or older received 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 220 micrograms).

Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 110 micrograms).

Other Names:
  • Nasacort AQ
Sham Comparator: Placebo

Placebo nasal spray; Subjects aged 12 years or older received an aqueous solution lacking triamcinolone, 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily for 6 weeks duration.

Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray of placebo solution in each nostril once daily for 6 weeks duration.

Subjects aged 12 years or older received an aqueous solution lacking triamcinolone, 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily.

Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray of placebo solution in each nostril once daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry, Regardless of Additional Treatment
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Number of subjects with resolution of eustachian tube dysfunction symptoms, as determined by the change in tympanogram type in both ears from an initial Type B or C result to Type A result at 6 weeks. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry Considering the Subjects Who Took Additional Treatment as Having Incomplete Resolution
Time Frame: 6 weeks
For this outcome measure, the subjects treated with antibiotics or oral decongestants while enrolled in the study were handled as having treatment failures. For this outcome measure, subjects with complete normalization of abnormal tympanometry at 6 weeks had a Type A tympanogram and did not take antibiotics, oral decongestants, nasal spray or a combination.
6 weeks
Per-Ear Treatment Outcome
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
Initial Tympanogram Type at baseline was compared to Follow-Up Tympanogram Type at 6 weeks. Type A is considered to be normal. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.
baseline, 6 weeks
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in Ears
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
baseline, 6 weeks
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in Ears
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
baseline, 6 weeks
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in Ears
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
baseline, 6 weeks
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in Ears
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
baseline, 6 weeks
Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than Usual
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.
baseline, 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura J. Orvidas, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe