Hepatitis C Self-Management

April 6, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

A Self-Management Intervention for Veterans With Hepatitis C

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of a 6-session hepatitis C self-management workshop to a hepatitis C self-management self-study program. Both interventions are designed to help people with hepatitis C learn to actively self-manage their chronic HCV infection, and ultimately, to improve health outcomes for veterans with HCV who are not receiving Interferon-based treatment. Participants complete a total of four assessments. The fourth assessment, a 12-18 month assessment is an approved addition to the original study design

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) is a major health concern that disproportionately affects U.S. veterans. Veterans with HCV experience impaired quality of life as a result of HCV infection and other co-morbid disorders; namely substance abuse and mental health problems. Only a small proportion of these patients currently receive and are cured of HCV with Interferon-based treatments. Treatment recommendations for HCV-infected veterans not scheduled for Interferon-based treatment include additional evaluations/procedures and adherence to behavioral/lifestyle guidelines. However, many patients with HCV and commonly occurring co-morbidities have difficulty following these recommendations without additional assistance. HCV self-management programs are one option for helping these patients adhere to treatment recommendations while improving their quality of life. Patient self-management programs augment traditional information-oriented patient education with problem-solving skills and cognitive-behavioral techniques that enable patients to manage chronic illness and their lives as a whole.

Objectives: Our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of a 6-session self-management workshop designed to improve health outcomes for veterans with HCV who are not receiving Interferon-based treatment.

Methods: One hundred- thirty seven Veterans with HCV who receive health care at VA San Diego Healthcare System facilities were randomized to either the HCV Self-Management Workshop (HCV-SMW) or to the Information intervention study arm. The self-management intervention includes six 2.5-hour weekly workshop sessions in addition to the basic information provided to Usual Care. The HCV-SMW was co-led by a health educator and a peer-leader, and has been adapted from an existing self-management program that has been effective for patients with other chronic illnesses. The primary outcome for the study is health-related quality of life. Secondary outcome variables include attendance at recommended health care visits, self-reported health behaviors related to preventing viral transmission, substance use/abuse, and patient-provider communication. Data was collected at baseline, end-of-intervention (6 weeks), at a 12-month and 18-month follow-up visits using self-report questionnaires. In accordance with HIPAA guidelines, VA medical records and other databases were accessed to gather data on health care utilization and mortality. Data was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, ANCOVA, and linear mixed-model approaches. In addition, an exploratory cost analysis will be conducted when final analyses are conducted.

Status: The study was completed in 2011. Results have been published and citations are provided on this website. An additional manuscript including a cost-effectiveness analysis is in the process of being published.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92161
        • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • VA patient
  • Diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C viral infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing treatment with Interferon and/or Ribavirin currently or within 6 months of enrollment
  • Inability to confirm HCV diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Self-Management Workshop
The workshop is a once per week 2.5 hour group that meets for six weeks.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Information Only
This is an individual self-paced at home study program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Well-being Scale - Self-Administered (QWB-SA)
Time Frame: Base Line, 12 months
The QWB-SA is a preference-based measure of health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 1.0, with 0 representing death, and 1.0 representing asymptomatic, optimal functioning. Thus, higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
Base Line, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hepatitis C Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Base Line, 6 weeks
The measure consists of 15 questions covering Hepatitis C-specific information related to disease self-management. Each correct response is scored as one point, with total scores range from 0 to 15. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Hepatitis C-specific knowledge. There are no subscales.
Base Line, 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 19, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe