Study to Evaluate Changes in CD4 on Replacing TDF With ABC or DDI+TDF With ABC+3TC

March 19, 2015 updated by: Hospital de Granollers

Study of Changes in CD4 Lymphocyte Count in Patients With a HAART Regimen Including DDI + Tenofovir and With Viral Suppression Following the Replacement of Tenofovir With Abacavir Once Daily or Following the Double Replacement of DDI + Tenofovir With Abacavir + Lamivudine in a Single Tablet

The study aims to ascertain whether the sole replacement of tenofovir with abacavir once a day improves the immunological response obtained with tenofovir + ddI or whether it is better to perform a double replacement of tenofovir and ddI with abacavir + lamivudine (joint formulation) in a single daily dose to achieve these objectives.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Different works have shown a high rate of virological failure among patients on abacavir + lamivudine + tenofovir or ddI + 3TC + tenofovir, thus rendering the use of these combinations actively unadvisable.

Furthermore, recent studies have also shown that ABC+3TC are associated with a significantly higher increase in CD4 than the current treatment standard formed by AZT+3TC. This provides us with grounds to suppose that patients with TDF+ddI may recover their CD4 with ABC+3HT. Similarly, and recently, the existence of pharmacokinetic interactions between tenofovir + abacavir has begun to be questioned.

Finally, the replacement of tenofovir with abacavir or tenofovir + ddI with abacavir + lamivudine does not detract from the potency of HAART, the toxicity profile is different and their behaviour at mitochondrial level is similar.

This study aims to ascertain whether the sole replacement of tenofovir with abacavir once a day improves the immunological response obtained with tenofovir + ddI or whether it is better to perform a double replacement of tenofovir and ddI with abacavir + lamivudine (joint formulation) in a single daily dose to achieve these objectives.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic De Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
      • Castello, Spain, 12004
        • Hospital General de Castellón, , Castellón,
      • Gandia, Spain, 46700
        • H. San Fco Borja Gandia
      • Gijon, Spain, 33394
        • Hospital de Cabueñes
      • Granada, Spain, 18012
        • Hospital Clínico San Cecilio
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Fundación Jiménez Díaz
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clínico San Carlos
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41009
        • Hospital Virgen Macarena
      • Tarragona, Spain, 43007
        • Hospital Joan XXIII
      • Valencia, Spain, 46015
        • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
      • Vigo, Spain, 36204
        • Hospital Xeral de Vigo
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • Germans Trias I Pujol Hospital
      • Calella, Barcelona, Spain, 08370
        • Hospital Sant Jaume de Calella
      • Mataro, Barcelona, Spain, 08304
        • Hospital de Mataró
    • Bilabao
      • Bilbao, Bilabao, Spain, 48013
        • Hospital Basurto
    • Cádiz
      • Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain, 11407
        • H. del S.A.S. Jerez de la Frontera
    • Granollers
      • Barcelona, Granollers, Spain, 08400
        • Fundació Hospital de Granollers,
    • La Coruña
      • El Ferrol, La Coruña, Spain, 15405
        • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide
    • Santander
      • Torrelavega, Santander, Spain, 39300
        • Hospital Sierrallana

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years.
  • HIV-1 infected patients.
  • Patients on triple HAART therapy including ddI + tenofovir plus a PI or NNRTI for at least 3 months.
  • Patients with an undetectable HIV-1 viral load (< 50 copies RNA / mL or < centre's limit of detection) over the last 6 months.
  • Not be on treatment with immunosuppressives, such as: hydroxyurea, interferon, ribavirin or cytostatics.
  • Not be on treatment with interleukin-2 or other immunomodulators.
  • Women may not be of fertile age (defined as at least one year from menopause or undergoing any surgical sterilisation technique), or must undertake to use a barrier contraceptive method during the study.
  • Signature of the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incapacity to give informed consent.
  • Bad adherence or treatment interruptions over the previous 6 months.
  • Prior exposure to abacavir.
  • HAART Therapy including ddI at a dose of 400mg + tenofovir if weight > 60 kg or ddI 250 mg + tenofovir if weight < 60 kg.
  • Suspicion of cross resistances to abacavir and lamivudine.
  • Hepatic or pancreatic analytical alterations 4 times above the limit of normality.
  • Presence of opportunistic infections and/or recent tumours (< 6 months).
  • Patients participating in another clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: 1
Maintain antiretroviral treatment
Experimental: 2
Change tenofovir to abacavir and increase didanosine dose to 400 mg/day if weight is > 60 Kg. or to 250mg/day if weight is < 60 kg.
Change tenofovir to abacavir
Other Names:
  • n/h.
Increase didanosine dose to 400 mg/day if weight is > 60 Kg. or to 250mg/day if weight is < 60 kg.
Other Names:
  • n/h.
Experimental: 3
Change tenofovir and didanosine to abacavir + lamivudine (600mg+300 mg/day in one single tablet).
Change tenofovir and didanosine to abacavir + lamivudine (600mg+300 mg/day in one single tablet).
Other Names:
  • n/h.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of patients that increase their number of CD4 lymphocytes with regard to the baseline.
Time Frame: At 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks
At 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To evaluate the proportion of patients with viral load of HIV-1 <50 copies of the combinations studied during the follow-up period.
Time Frame: At 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
At 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
Incidence of new clinical adverse events that appear .
Time Frame: during 48 weeks of follow-up
during 48 weeks of follow-up
Evolution of the clinical adverse events that were already present at the time they were included in the study.
Time Frame: during the 48 weeks of follow-up
during the 48 weeks of follow-up
Rate of treatment drop-outs due to the appearance of adverse events
Time Frame: during the 48 weeks of follow-up
during the 48 weeks of follow-up
Incidence of new laboratory alterations that appear during the follow-up period (change in renal parameters, changes in lactate levels, modification of pancreatic enzymes, changes in lipid parameters).
Time Frame: during the follow-up period
during the follow-up period
Evolution of the laboratory alterations that were already present at the time they were included in the study.
Time Frame: during the 48 weeks of follow-up
during the 48 weeks of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enric Pedrol, MD, PhD, Fundació Hospital de Granollers

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Abacavir

3
Subscribe