Aruba Aloë Formula F-BC-096 in the Treatment of Split Thickness Donor Sites After Wound Closure

July 1, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blinded Controlled Clinical Trial of the Aruba Aloë Formula F-BC-096 in the Treatment of Split Thickness Donor Sites After Wound Closure

Comparison between use of Aruba Aloë formula F-BC-096 and control.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with two equal donor sites will be selected for inclusion. After wound healing one donor site will be treated with Aruba Aloë Formula F-BC-096 while a control product will be applied to the second site.

If pressure garments are applied they must be equal for both donor sites. During follow-ups objective methods will be used to evaluate elasticity and colour of the scar.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • University Hospital Ghent

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have two similar donor sites, identical in depth and wound treatment.
  • Healing time of both donor sites may differ by 3 days maximum.
  • Flux values determined by Laser Doppler Imaging before commencement of the therapy must be approximately similar.
  • If possible, the donor sites to be compared must have the same location.
  • Patient compliance with therapy in relation to the protocol is necessary. In case of pediatric patiënts this depends on collaboration of the parents.
  • For the two donor sites to be compared, the entire after-treatment concerning pressure garments or eventual silicone sheets must be equal for both donor sites.
  • Patients must be available for regular and necessary follow-up.
  • Possibility to finish all measurements during follow-up visits.
  • Written authorisation of the patient, family or parents is required.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Donor sites are not similar (not identical in: depth, wound treatment, healing time and flux values)
  • Children requiring sedation for LDI of donor sites
  • Not following the complete treatment schedule or missing some evaluations during the follow-up period
  • Patient has any condition(s) that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete this study.
  • Patient has participated in another study utilizing an investigational drug or device within the previous 30 days
  • Patient has one or more medical condition(s), diabetes, including renal, hepatic, hematologic, neurologic, or immune disease that in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient an inappropriate candidate for this study
  • Patients wish to terminate the study
  • No informed consent before start of the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Scar assessment after 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Scar assessment 3, 6 and 12 months after wound closure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2006/326

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hydration of Scars

Clinical Trials on Application of Aruba Aloë formula F-BC-096 or control

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Bahamas

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe