Shoulder, or Elbow, or Wrist: What Should we Train First After a Stroke?

The Effect of Proximal and Distal Training on Stroke Recovery

We will test on persons with chronic impairment due to stroke:

  1. whether the order in which robot therapy is delivered influences outcomes (shoulder-and-elbow before wrist vs. wrist before shoulder-and-elbow).
  2. whether we should train the shoulder, elbow, and wrist at the same time or on different days.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The Effect of Proximal and Distal Training on Stroke Recovery:

Specific Aim 1. Test whether task specific wrist robotic training improves motor performance among persons with chronic impairment after stroke.

Specific Aim 2. Test whether the order in which robot therapy is delivered influences outcomes (shoulder-and-elbow before wrist vs. wrist before shoulder-and-elbow).

Specific Aim 3. Test whether there is generalization across different joints (shoulder & elbow vs wrist).

Specific Aim 4: Test whether there is any interference between training across different joints among persons with chronic impairment after stroke.

Briefly we will invite persons with chronic impairment due to stroke to participate in a study that will train them first on wrist for 6 weeks and then on the shoulder-and-elbow for an additional 6 weeks or vice-versa. A third group will train in alternate days for 12 weeks on the shoulder-and-elbow or the wrist, while a fourth group will be trained on the shoulder, elbow, and wrist on the same day. Outcomes will be measured using standard instruments as well as robot-based measures. We expect that results from this study will provide an objective basis for maximizing this kind of therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

190

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • White Plains, New York, United States, 10605
        • Burke Medical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be included in the study if they meet the following criteria:

  1. naïve subjects who have never experienced robot-assisted therapy as inpatients or outpatients;
  2. first single focal unilateral lesion with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that has occurred at least 6 months prior;
  3. cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (Mini-Mental Status Score of 22 and higher or interview for aphasic subjects);
  4. average Motor Power score >= 1/5 or <= 3/5 (neither hemiplegic nor fully recovered motor function in 6 muscles of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist);
  5. informed written consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded from the study if they have a fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: proximal to distal training
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)
Experimental: distal to proximal
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)
Experimental: proximal and distal on alternate days
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)
Experimental: proximal and distal same day
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)
sequence of intervention
Other Names:
  • InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer
Time Frame: 3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up
3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up
Motor Power
Time Frame: 3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up
3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Wolf Motor Function
Time Frame: 3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up
3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up
SIS
Time Frame: 3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up
3 times at baseline, midpoint, completion intervention, and at follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hermano I Krebs, PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe