Chevron Osteotomy Versus SCARF Osteotomy in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus

December 29, 2008 updated by: University Hospital, Limoges

Comparison between two techniques of osteotomy wich are more or less invasive : two criterias : clinical data and x-rays data.

All patients operated for hallux valgus for 01/01/99 to 31/12/03 in the department of bone surgery CHU Limoges :

  • Scarf or Jonhson (chevron) osteotomy
  • Experienced surgeon : Pr ARNAUD, Pr MABIT or Pr CHARISSOUX.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Prospective assessmentfor all patients with an average follow up of 5 years :

  • Groulier score scale (similar to AOFAS score rating)
  • X-rays data
  • Clinical evaluation
  • Pedoscopic data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Limoges, France, 87000
        • Department of Bone Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients operated for hallux valgus for 01/01/99 to 31/12/03 in the department of bone surgery CHU Limoges.

    • Scarf or Johnson (Chevron) osteotomy,
    • Experienced surgeon : Pr MABIT, Pr ARNAUD, Pr CHARISSOUX.
  • Age of Patients > 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hallux valgus wich wasn't operated by these surgeons.
  • No consentment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Comparison between two techniques of osteotomy wich are more or less invasive : two criterias : clinical data and x-rays data.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Extension of chevron osteotomy indication. Check of results for one-year more operated patients by chevron osteotomy.
Comparaison of both techniques concerning post-operative complication.
Search of significative difference about satisfaction of patients.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Limoges

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chistrian MABIT, MD, CHU Limoges

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2008

Last Verified

December 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • I06020

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe