Effect of Race on Gonadotropin Responses

June 28, 2017 updated by: Janet E. Hall, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Effect of Race on Gonadotropin Responses to Short Term Negative and Positive Feedback Effects of Gonadal Steroids

The purpose of this study is to attempt to determine why estrogen levels are increased in African-American women as compared to Caucasian women by evaluating estrogen feedback on the brain. African-American women have increased bone mineral density, higher rates of twins, greater incidence of fibroids, and increased incidence of breast cancer below 40 years of age as compared to Caucasian women. These traits or illnesses are all believed to be estrogen-dependent. In fact, previous research has demonstrated increased estrogen levels in African-American women as compared to Caucasian women. However, the reason for these differences in estrogen levels has not been studied in humans. One possibility is that estrogen feedback on the brain differs between African-American and Caucasian women. Two small glands in the brain (hypothalamus and pituitary) respond to estrogen. The hypothalamus secretes GnRH (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone) that signals the pituitary to secrete the reproductive hormones, LH (Luteinizing Hormone) and FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone). These hormones act on the ovaries and signal the ovaries to produce estrogen and progesterone. Estrogen in the bloodstream then acts on the brain to stop this system when the blood has enough estrogen levels. This is called estrogen feedback. This study will determine whether there are differences in estrogen feedback between African-American and Caucasian women.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Several independent lines of evidence have suggested that reproductive endocrine dynamics may differ between African-American (AAW) and Caucasian (CW) women. There is an increased incidence of dizygotic twinning in African-American women and a further increase in the incidence reported in African women compared to Caucasian, Hispanic and Asian populations. While the etiology of dizygotic twinning is not well understood, an increase in its incidence may imply an alteration in the integrated control of the reproductive axis which usually favors development of a single ovulatory follicle. It is widely appreciated that the incidence of leiomyomas is increased in African-American women. Growth factors are likely to play a role in their control, but there is also ample evidence that leiomyomas are responsive to gonadal steroids, decreasing in size following the menopause and in response to hypoestrogenism caused by gonadotropin downregulation. African-American women under 40 years of age have a higher risk of breast cancer than women of all other ethnicities in that age group, again raising the question of whether there are also differences in reproductive hormone dynamics. Finally, bone density is increased in African-American women. In a cross-sectional study of 54 African-American and 39 Caucasian women between the ages of 20 and 90, Perry et al found that the increase in bone density in AAW was associated with increased serum levels of both estradiol and testosterone. Woods et al also described increased levels of estradiol, estrone and androstenedione levels in AAW compared with control women on a controlled low-fat, high-fiber diet. In contrast, a recent longitudinal cohort study has suggested that AAW have lower levels of estradiol with increasing age and BMI in comparison with CW. We have compared reproductive hormone levels in AAW and CW < 35 years old with a history of regular ovulatory cycles. Our preliminary data indicate that in comparison to age and BMI matched CW, estradiol levels are consistently elevated across the cycle in AAW in the absence of changes in LH, FSH, progesterone, inhibin A or inhibin B. These relationships suggest both altered negative and forward feedback interrelationships between FSH and LH and estradiol in the setting of normal inhibin levels. In the current protocol we will seek to understand the mechanisms underlying these feedback differences, which have never been addressed in these populations.

A graded infusion of estradiol and progesterone can be used to assess differences in negative and positive feedback of gonadal steroids on LH and FSH. We have hypothesized that differences exist in feedback regulation of the hypothalamus and pituitary as a function of African-American or Caucasian race in reproductive aged women.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • African-American women aged 18 to 35 years and Caucasian women aged 18 to 36 years. Subjects will be asked to volunteer information on ethnicity (self classification). Only African-American and Caucasian subjects will be included in this aim to address the specific hypotheses.
  • BMI <30
  • In good general health with normal TSH, prolactin and hemoglobin
  • Normal BUN and Creatinine (< 2 times the upper limit of normal)
  • On no medications for > 2 months before the study
  • Regular menstrual cycles every 25 to 35 days and ovulation documented by a luteal phase progesterone > 3 ng/ml
  • Willing to use abstinence or barrier methods of contraception for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria:

  • postmenopausal
  • smoking >9 cigarettes per day
  • evidence of androgen excess.
  • sensitivity to any medications used in the relevant protocol
  • race other than African-American or Caucasian
  • Hispanic ethnicity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: African American women 18-35 yo
intervention: estradiol steroid infusion and progesterone steroid infusion
Estradiol infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr, 0.135 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr, 0.165 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr and 0.2 mcg/kg/hr for 60 hr
Other Names:
  • E2
Progesterone infusion of 4.77 nmol/kg/hr (1.5 mcg/kg/hr) for 24 hr and 6.36 nmol/kg/hr (2 mcg/kg/hr) for the final 24 hr
Other Names:
  • P
Active Comparator: Caucasian women 18-35 yo
intervention: estradiol steroid infusion intervention: progesterone steroid infusion
Estradiol infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr, 0.135 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr, 0.165 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr and 0.2 mcg/kg/hr for 60 hr
Other Names:
  • E2
Progesterone infusion of 4.77 nmol/kg/hr (1.5 mcg/kg/hr) for 24 hr and 6.36 nmol/kg/hr (2 mcg/kg/hr) for the final 24 hr
Other Names:
  • P

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LH Peak in Response to Estrogen Positive Feedback
Time Frame: 5 days of estradiol and progesterone infusion
Estradiol levels are consistently higher in African-American vs Caucasian women across the menstrual cycle. This study was designed to determine if African-American women are more sensitive to estrogen positive feedback to generate the preovulatory LH surge using a controlled estrogen infusion paradigm.
5 days of estradiol and progesterone infusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2003P-001397
  • Sundry Department Fund (Other Identifier: MGH-REU Department Fund)
  • R01AG013241 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Coded individual level data with all identifiers removed will be available on request to the PI.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe