Treatement of Extension Fractures of the Distal Radius (fradius)

July 17, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Limoges

Treatement of Extension Fractures of the Distal Radius : Prospective Randomized Postoperative Comparison Between Trans-styloid and Intrafical Pinning on the One Side and Volar Fixed-angle Plating on the Other Side.

Treatment of extension fractures of the distal radius : prospective randomized postoperative comparison between trans-styloid and intrafocal pinning on the one side and volar fixed-angle plating on the other side.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Distal radius fractures are more and more numerous. Most of the time, the people concerned are elderly or old with an osteoporotic bone, and an important dorsal metaphysal comminution. The French reference treatment of the extension distal radius fracture, the Kapandji method, turns out to be less and less performing to treat such complicated fractures. At the moment, two points of view are in opposition in France. On the one side, the point of view of those who are in favour of the treatment by intrafocal pinning: they think they will be able to improve their technique if they add a trans-styloid pinning of stabilisation. On the other side, those who are in favour of a treatment using a volar fixed-angle plating.

The purpose of the study is to compare these two types of treatment by using a prospective and randomized analysis.

The main judging criterion will lay on an X-ray assessment of the distal radius, we will try to find a loss of reduction at tree month.

The secondary criteria will lay on fonctional scores (quickDASH and Herzberg score) at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, as well as on post-operative X-ray assessments in order to compare post-operative reduction of the distal radius fracture.

All the patients taken to the emergency ward of Limoges Hospital, and suffering from an extension distal radius fracture (intra or extra articular according to Kapandji classification) will have the possibility to participate in this study, if they want to.

The patients will be X-rayed before and after the operation, they will have an immobilization for 3 weeks. Then the cast will be removed, and new X-rays will be taken. Then the patients will be allowed to perform their daily activities. A new follow-up control will take place 6 week later, it will include a new series X-rays and functional scores. At this point, people will be able to start physiotherapy. New functional scores and X-ray assessments will still be taken 3 and 6 months later.

All the X-rays will be analyzed by an orthopaedist, a radiologist, and by a radiological software.

  • Fonctional scores (quickDASH and Herzberg score) at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.
  • X-ray assessment after the operation and at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Limoges,, France, 87000
        • Department of Bone Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient who is affiliated to the NHS (National Health Service)
  • patient who has officially given his consent
  • on over 50 year old patient
  • Patient with an extension fracture of the distal radius
  • patient who is in no condition to express his consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient who is under the protection of justice
  • Patient with an open fracture
  • Patient with an flexion fracture of the distal radius
  • Patient with a metastasis localized in the distal radius
  • traumatised patient
  • patient who is liable not to profit by medical follow-up in Limoges hospital after he has been operated on
  • A pregnant woman / a parturient / a breast-feeding mother
  • patient who is serving a sentence .
  • patient sent to hospital without his consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: trans-styloid and intrafocal pinning on the one side
Other: volar fixed-angle plating on the other side

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The main judging criterion will lay on an X-ray assessment of the distal radius, we will try to find a loss of reduction.
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The secondary criteria will lay on fonctional scores (quickDASH and Herzberg score), as well as on post-operative X-ray assessments in order to compare post-operative reduction of the distal radius fracture.
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Louis CHARISSOUX, MD, CHU Limoges

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

June 27, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • I06029

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe