A Non-Comparative Study to Assess the Safety of MabThera (Rituximab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

August 22, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

Multicenter Non-Comparative Expanded Access Program of to Assess Safety of Rituximab (Mab Anti Cd-20) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (Ser)

This single arm study will assess the safety of MabThera plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had a lack of response to 1-5 DMARDs or biological agents. Patients will receive MabThera (1g i.v.) on days 1 and 15, concomitantly with methotrexate >=15mg p.o./week. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

246

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1280AEB
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1426AAL
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1425
      • Córdoba, Argentina, 5000
      • San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina, 4000
      • Tucuman, Argentina, 4000
      • Belem, Brazil, 66063-240
      • Brasilia, Brazil, 70322000
      • Brasilia, Brazil, 70390-904
      • Campinas, Brazil, 13015-001
      • Campinas, Brazil, 13025-141
      • Curitiba, Brazil, 80730-000
      • Florianopolis, Brazil, 88040-970
      • Fortaleza, Brazil, 60155-290
      • Fortaleza, Brazil, 60430-370
      • Goiania, Brazil, 74110010
      • Nova Lima, Brazil, 34000-000
      • Porto Alegre, Brazil, 90610-000
      • Recife, Brazil, 50000-000
      • Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, 14048-900
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21941-590
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20551-030
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22050-000
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22640102
      • Salvador, Brazil, 40050-410
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-000
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04038-002
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04026-000
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 03128-050
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04038-040
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04039-004
      • Vitoria, Brazil, 29043-910
      • Santiago, Chile
      • Barranquilla, Colombia
      • Bogota, Colombia
      • Cuenca, Ecuador, 1394
      • Guayaquil, Ecuador
      • Quito, Ecuador, 1394
      • San Salvador, El Salvador
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 14080
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 02990
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 06920
      • San Luis Potosi, Mexico, 78240
      • Jesus Maria, Peru
      • Lima, Peru, 13
      • San Isidro, Peru, Lima 27
      • Montevideo, Uruguay, 11600
      • Barquisimeto, Venezuela, 3005
      • Caracas, Venezuela, 1010
      • Caracas, Venezuela, 1040

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • rheumatoid arthritis >=6 months;
  • lack of response to 1-5 DMARDs or biological agents;
  • rheumatoid factor positive.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other chronic inflammatory articular disease or systemic rheumatic disease;
  • joint or bone surgery during 8 weeks prior to randomization;
  • previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rituximab
Eligible participants receiving Rituximab (MabThera/Rituxan) 1 gram/dose (g/dose) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 15 followed by previous pre-medication (methylprednisolone 100 mg IV, antihistamine and antipyretic) and concomitant treatment of Methotrexate at least 15 mg per oris (PO) weekly were observed during the study period of 24 weeks. After treatment completion, participants were followed-up for safety up to 24 weeks.
1g iv on days 1 and 15
>=15 mg po/week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event, Any Serious Adverse Event, and Death
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
An Adverse event (AE) was considered any unfavorable medical event in a participant of clinical research who received the study drug and that not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could, therefore, being any unfavorable sign and non-intentional, symptom or disease temporarily related with the use of a medicinal product, considered or not related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as AEs. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any experience that suggested a significant risk, contraindication, caution, and at any dose fulfills at least one of the following criteria: adverse event considered as fatal (resulting in death), life threatening, defect of birth/congenital abnormality, required hospitalization or extension of hospital length of stay, significant medical intervention, resulted in significant disability/impairment.
Up to Week 48
Number of Participants With AEs According to Degree of Intensity
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
An AE is any unfavorable sign and non-intentional, symptom or disease temporarily related with the use of a medicinal product, considered or not related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as AEs. The Intensity of AEs was classified as Grade 1, Grade 2, Grade 3 and Grade 4. Grade 1: Discomfort was noticed, but the normal daily activity was not interrupted. Grade 2: Discomfort was enough to reduce the normal daily activity. Grade 3: There was disability for work or develop normal daily activities. Grade 4: It represented an immediate threat to life (these events were reported as SAEs).
Up to Week 48
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Any Drug Related AEs and SAEs
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
An AE is any unfavorable sign and non-intentional, symptom or disease temporarily related with the use of a medicinal product, considered or not related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as AEs. A SAE is any experience that suggested a significant risk, contraindication, caution, and at any dose, fulfills, at least, one of the following criteria: adverse event considered as fatal (resulting in death), life threatening, defect of birth/congenital abnormality, required hospitalization or extension of hospital length of stay, significant medical intervention, resulted in significant disability/impairment. Relationship between AEs and medication under investigation was evaluated through the classification "Yes" and "No". A relationship classified as "Yes" implied a significant causal relationship with the medication under investigation which was evaluated based on enough evidences, facts or arguments.
Up to Week 48
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the Study
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
Adverse event of special interest during the study treatment and follow up period included infections. The participants with AEs of special interest were reported at Screening, End of treatment (EOT), and End of Follow-up (EOFU) visit.
Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Values of Hematology Parameters at Screening and EOT Visit (Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration)
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The values of hemoglobin (Hb) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) for each participant were estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Hematology Parameters at Screening and EOT Visit (Hematocrit, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, and Basophils)
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The hematology parameters (hematocrit, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils) for each participant were estimated at Screening and at EOT.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Hematology Parameter at Screening and EOT Visit (Mean Corpuscular Volume)
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is the average volume of red cells. The mean MCV concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and EOT.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Hematology Parameter at Screening and EOT Visit (Erythrocytes)
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The mean erythrocyte concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Hematology Parameters at Screening and EOT Visit (Leucocytes and Platelets)
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The mean leucocytes and platelets concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening, at EOT visit.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Biochemistry Parameters at Screening and Visit 8 (Albumin and Glucose)
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The mean albumin and glucose concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Cholesterol, Uric Acid, Urea, Creatinine, Calcium, Total Bilirubin and Serum Total Proteins at Screening and EOT Visit.
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The mean concentration of cholesterol, uric acid, urea, creatinine, calcium, total bilirubin and serum total proteins (STP) for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Potassium, Chlorine, Sodium, and Phosphorus at Screening and EOT Visit
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The mean concentration of potassium, chlorine, sodium and phosphorus for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Values of Aspartate Transaminase, Alanine Transaminase, Alkaline Phosphatase, and Lactic Dehydrogenase at Screening and EOT Visit
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
The mean aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (AP), and Lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.
Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)
Mean Duration of Morning Joint Stiffness
Time Frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
The efficacy of rituximab was assessed by evaluating mean duration of morning joint stiffness.
Screening ((Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
Mean Value of Painful Joints
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
The efficacy of rituximab was assessed by evaluating painful joints.
Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (20, 50, and 70) Criteria
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement consisting of 20%, 50%, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) reduction in tender joints and swollen joints, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain); patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity using a VAS (0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity); health assessment questionnaire (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant; C-reactive protein and globular sedimentation velocity.
Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
Mean Value of Quality of Life (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index)
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) indicates how the disease affected participant's activities of daily life. It consisted of 20 questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities) rated on a 4-point scale, 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do. Sum of scores was divided by number of domains with a score for a total possible score of 0 (best/no difficulties to perform activities) to 3 (worst/ unable to perform activities at all).
Screening (Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
Mean Values of C Reactive Protein
Time Frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
C Reactive Protein (CRP) is a component of ACR. CRP is a marker of inflammation.
Screening ((Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
Mean Values of Globular Sedimentation Velocity
Time Frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
Globular sedimentation velocity is a component of ACR.
Screening ((Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
Mean Values of Pain and Activity Based on Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
Pain assessment was assessed by using a VAS (0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain). Disease activity was also evaluated by participants and investigators by using a VAS (0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity).
Screening ((Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24
Mean Value of Inflamed Joints
Time Frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)
The efficacy of rituximab was assessed by evaluating inflamed joints.
Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]

3
Subscribe