Effects of Titrated Oral Tolvaptan 15-60 mg Once Daily (QD) on Cognitive and Neurological Function in Elderly Hyponatremic Patients (INSIGHT)

A Pilot, Phase 3B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study of the Effects of Titrated Oral Tolvaptan 15, 30, or 60 mg QD on Cognitive and Neurological Function in Elderly Hyponatremic Patients

Demonstrate an improvement in the composite scores of validated neurocognitive tests in elderly subjects with chronic sub-clinical (i.e., asymptomatic) hyponatremia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects will be randomized, with stratification by baseline sodium <130 or ≥ 130 mEq/L[mmol/L] to receive either tolvaptan 15 mg tablet or matching placebo tablet at doses of 15, 30 or 60 mg for 21 days. During this period, fluid restrictions should be loosened or suspended, until the subject's response to therapy can be evaluated, typically over the first few days of therapy. Fluid restriction may be reinstituted at any time in subjects whose sodium fails to improve or worsens with study therapy. A forced-titration up to 60 mg of study drug by day 3 to 7 will be based on the subject's serum sodium Subjects entering the study with a serum sodium concentration less than 130 mEq/L[mmol/L] may be fluid restricted if necessary at the discretion of the Investigator. Subjects should be monitored closely during the first 24 hours of treatment for dosing titration. The total dosing duration will be up to 21 days (plus 3 day treatment window). Subjects will return to the clinic on Day 22 (+3 days) for assessments and will complete a follow-up visit on Day 28 (+2 days).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Hawthorne, California, United States, 90250
        • Sarah. S. Olelewe, MD
      • Vista, California, United States, 92083
        • Progressive Clinical Research
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
        • Pikes Peak Cardiology
    • Florida
      • Largo, Florida, United States, 33770
        • Innovative Research of West FL
      • Punta Gorda, Florida, United States, 33950
        • Coastal Nephrology Assoc. Research Center
    • Georgia
      • Conyers, Georgia, United States, 30094
        • Rockdale Medical Research Associates
    • Louisiana
      • Natchitoches, Louisiana, United States, 71457
        • Otis Barnum, DO
    • North Dakota
      • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58106
        • Lillestol Research, LLC
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29201
        • Carolina Research Associates
    • Tennessee
      • Lebanon, Tennessee, United States, 37087
        • Wayne O. Wells, MD
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77043
        • Memorial Clinical Associates
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • Mitchell Rosner, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women and men 50 years of age or older.
  • Serum Sodium ≥123 and ≤ 134 mEq/L [mmol/L]at screening and baseline.
  • Subjects with serum sodium concentrations ≥118 and ≤122 mEq/L[mmol/L] at screening and baseline may be entered into the trial based on consultation and approval from the study medical monitor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions or history which may present a safety concern to the subject or their offspring or extreme susceptibility to hypotension with sudden fluid loss (aquaresis).
  • Hyponatremia that is acute, easily reversible, artifactual, or due to a condition not associated with vasopressin excess or likely to respond to aquaretic therapy.
  • Conditions associated with an independent imminent risk of morbidity and mortality.
  • Conditions which may confound the assessment of endpoints, history of poor compliance, participation in a clinical trial believed by the PI or Sponsor likely to confound endpoint assessments.
  • Conditions which may confound primary endpoints of cognitive function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 1
Placebo tablet given once a day for 21 days
Placebo tablet given once daily for 21 days
Active Comparator: 2
Tolvaptan 15 mg-60 mg tablet given once a day for 21 days.
15-60 mg oral tablet given once a day for 21 days.
Other Names:
  • OPC-41061

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Neurocognitive Composite Score of Speed Domains (NCS-SD; Sum of All Correct Speed Domain Z-Scores)
Time Frame: baseline and Day 22
Change from baseline to Day 22 in sum of all speed domain Z-scores:Reaction Time (Simple=recognize "yes" 50 times;Choice=recognize "yes" or "no" 50 times;Digit Vigilance=match 45 digits);Psychomotor Speed (Morse Tapping=tap button for 30 seconds with right & left hands);Processing Speed (Rapid Visual Information Processing=detect consecutive sequences of 3 odd or 3 even digits;Numeric Working Memory=recognize numbers from series of 5 digits among 30;Word Recognition=remember 15 prior learned words from 30 total;results age-matched to healthy controls from Cognitive Drug Research normative data
baseline and Day 22

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Day 22 in the Individual Neurocognitive Domains Included in the Primary Endpoint: Reaction Time in Computer Tests
Time Frame: baseline and Day 22
Change from baseline in the individual neurocognitive domains Z-score for Reaction Time in Computer Tests (simple reaction time test, choice reaction time test, digit vigilance test); ITT population
baseline and Day 22
Change From Baseline in the Individual Neurocognitive Domains Included in the Primary Endpoint: Psychomotor Speed Via Morse Tapping Test
Time Frame: baseline and Day 22
Change from baseline to Day 22 in the individual neurocognitive domains Z-score for Psychomotor Speed (mean tap rate of Morse tapping test); ITT population
baseline and Day 22
Change From Baseline in the Individual Neurocognitive Domains Included in the Primary Endpoint: Processing Speed of Rapid Visual Information Processing Test, Numeric Working Memory Test, and Word Recognition Test
Time Frame: baseline and Day 22
Change from baseline to Day 22 in the individual neurocognitive domains Z-score for Processing Speed of Rapid Visual Information Processing Test, Numeric Working Memory Test, and Word Recognition Test; ITT population
baseline and Day 22
Change From Baseline in Overall Neurocognitive Composite Score
Time Frame: baseline and Day 22
Change from Baseline to Day 22 in the overall Neurocognitive Composite Score (NCS)comprising the sum of 7 neurocognitive domain Z-scores (Reaction Time, Psychomotor Speed, Processing Speed, Continuity of Attention, Working Memory/Executive Functions, Quality of Episodic Verbal Memory, and Postural Stability); ITT population
baseline and Day 22
Change From Baseline in Gait Test (Timed Get-Up-and-Go Test)
Time Frame: baseline and Day 22
Change from baseline to Day 22 in Gait Test (Timed Get-Up-and-Go Test=time it takes for a seated subject to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, walk around an object and return to sit in chair. Values: under 10 sec (no difficulties), 10 to 20 sec (starting to have balance difficulty), over 30 sec (at high risk for falls and dependent in most activities of daily living and mobility); test assesses risk to elderly subjects of falling and higher scores in seconds indicate higher risk of falling; ITT population
baseline and Day 22
Change From Baseline in Postural Stability Test
Time Frame: baseline and Day 22
Change from baseline to Day 22 in Postural Stability Test Z-score (This test measures gross motor control. The ability to stand upright without moving is assessed using the SWAY meter that is modeled on the Wright Ataxiameter. A cord from the meter is attached to the subject who is required to stand as still as possible with feet apart and eyes closed for 1 minute. The test is then repeated with eyes open for 1 minute. The outcomes of these tests are combined and measured as a movement Z-score. Higher result=better postural stability); ITT population
baseline and Day 22
Change From Baseline in Serum Sodium; ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 22
Change from Baseline to Day 22 in Serum Sodium; ITT population
Baseline and Day 22
Number of Patients With Vital Sign Abnormalities: Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of abnormal systolic & diastolic blood pressure values post-baseline (abnormal systolic values: >=180 mmHg + increase of >=20 mmHg, <= 90 mmHg + decrease >=20 mmHg; abnormal diastolic values: >=105 mmHg+increase of >=15 mmHg, <=50 mmHg + decrease of >= 15 mmHg)
28 days
Number of Patients With Vital Sign Abnormalities: Pulse Rate
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of abnormal pulse rate post-baseline [abnormal values: >=120 beats per minute (bpm) + increase of >=15 bpm; <=50 bpm + decrease of >=15 bpm]
28 days
Number of Patients With Vital Sign Abnormalities: Body Weight
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of clinically significant body weight change post-baseline (defined as change upward or downward of >=7%)
28 days
Number of Patients With Vital Sign Abnormalities: Body Temperature
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant changes in body temperature post-baseline (defined as an increase of >=1.1 to >=38.3 degrees Celsius)
28 days
Number of Patients With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: Hemoglobin
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of clinically significant hemoglobin abnormalities post-baseline (normal range=11.8-16.8 g/dL)
28 days
Number of Patients With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) levels post-baseline (normal range=22-34 seconds)
28 days
Number of Patients With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: Lymphocytes
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant lymphocyte count post-baseline (normal range = 16-46%)
28 days
Number of Patients With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: Neutrophils
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant neutrophil count post-baseline (normal range=1.8-8 thousands/microliter)
28 days
Number of Patients With Serum Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant BUN levels post-baseline (normal range=7-30 mg/dL)
28 days
Number of Patients With Serum Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities: Uric Acid
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant uric acid levels post-baseline (normal range=4-8.5 mg/dL)
28 days
Number of Patients With Serum Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities: Cholesterol
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant cholesterol levels post-baseline (normal range=0-199 mg/dL)
28 days
Number of Patients With Serum Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities: Glucose
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant glucose levels post-baseline (normal range=70-125 mg/dL)
28 days
Number of Patients With Serum Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities: Magnesium
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant magnesium levels post-baseline (normal range=1.2-2 mEq/L)
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: QT >500 Milliseconds (Msec)
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities (QT>500 msec) post-baseline
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: QRS Interval
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities involving QRS interval (change > 100 msec)
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: QTcB Increase 30-60 Msec
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities (QTcB increase 30-60 msec)
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: QTcF Increase 30-60 Msec
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities (QTcF increase 30-60 msec post-baseline)
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: ST Segment
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities: ST Segment
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: T Wave
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities: T wave
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB), Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB), Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities: Right bundle branch block (RBBB), Left bundle branch block (LBBB), myocardial infarction (MI)
28 days
Number of Patients With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities: Arrhythmia
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities: arrhythmia
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Verbalis, MD, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20007 USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyponatremia

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe