Pramipexole Pilot Phase II Study in Children and Adolescents With Tourette Disorder According to DSM-IV Criteria

May 7, 2014 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Flexible Dose Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pramipexole Immediate Release (0.125-0.5mg/Day) Versus Placebo for 6 Weeks in Children and Adolescents (Age 6-17 Inclusive) Diagnosed With Tourette Disorder According to DSM IV Criteria.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible dose study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Pramipexole versus placebo for 6 weeks in children (age 6-17) diagnosed with Tourette Disorder according to DSM IV criteria. The primary efficacy measure will be the Total Tic Score (TTS) of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) at 6 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hannover, Germany
        • 248.644.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Ulm, Germany
        • 248.644.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States
        • 248.644.0026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
        • 248.644.0025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Georgia
      • Columbus, Georgia, United States
        • 248.644.0006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • 248.644.0012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
        • 248.644.0005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States
        • 248.644.0003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • New York, New York, United States
        • 248.644.0009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • New York, New York, United States
        • 248.644.0018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Orangeburg, New York, United States
        • 248.644.0013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
        • 248.644.0029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States
        • 248.644.0010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States
        • 248.644.0030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • 248.644.0008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States
        • 248.644.0023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male of female patients 6-17 yrs.
  • Written informed consent.
  • Diagnosed with Tourette's Disorder with a > or equal to 22 on the Total Tic Score at baseline.
  • Diagnosed with Tourette's Disorder when administering the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.
  • Having at least 1 tic/day.
  • Women of childbearing age must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and must use a medically accepted contraceptive method.
  • Either a newly diagnosed patient or a patient diagnosed with Tourette's Disorder who can safely discontinue treatment.
  • Having a body weight of > or equal to 20 kg (44 lbs).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any women of childbearing age having a positive serum pregnancy test at screening.
  • Patients who have clinically significant renal disease or serum creatinine greater than 1.0 mg/dL at screening.
  • Lab results at screening: hemoglobin below lower limit of normal which is determined to be clinically significant; Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), triiodothyronine (T3) or thyroxine (T4) clinically significant; clinically significant abnormalities in labs.
  • Other clinically significant metabolic-endocrine, hematological, gastrointestinal disease, pulmonary disease which would preclude the patient from participating in this study.
  • History of Schizophrenia or any psychotic disorder, history of mental disorders or any present Axis I psychiatric disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) requiring any medical therapy except for patients with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who are not on therapy.
  • History of/or clinical signs of epilepsy or seizures other than fever related seizures in early childhood.
  • History of/or clinical signs of any malignant neoplasm.
  • Allergic response to pramipexole.
  • Had previous treatment with dopamine agonists other than pramipexole within 14 days prior to baseline visit.
  • Had any other medical treatment for Tourette's Disorder besides the study medication within 28 days prior to baseline visit.
  • Had withdrawal symptoms of any medication at screening or at the baseline visit.
  • Having a Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT IQ) score <70 at screening.
  • Having a children's Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (CY-BOCS) score of >15 at baseline.
  • Patients who meet criteria for Restless Legs Syndrome and or Periodic Limb Movement disorder.
  • Patients with severe asthma.
  • Patients that have initiated psychotherapy for Tourette's Disorder, OCD or ADHD within 3 mths of starting the trial.
  • Patients receiving psychological, cognitive and/or behavioral treatments greater than 3 mths prior to start of trial for Tourette's Disorder, OCD, and/or ADHD who will have changes in treatment plan.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Other: Pramipexole

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale
Time Frame: baseline 6 weeks

Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50.

Analysis was adjusted for baseline total tic score and age as linear covariates.

baseline 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 1
Time Frame: baseline 1 week
Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50
baseline 1 week
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 2
Time Frame: baseline and 2 weeks
Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50
baseline and 2 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 3
Time Frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50
baseline and 3 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 4
Time Frame: baseline and 4 weeks
Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50
baseline and 4 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 6
Time Frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)
baseline and 6 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 1
Time Frame: baseline 1 week
Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)
baseline 1 week
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 2
Time Frame: baseline and 2 weeks
Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)
baseline and 2 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 3
Time Frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)
baseline and 3 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 4
Time Frame: baseline 4 weeks
Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)
baseline 4 weeks
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at 1 Week
Time Frame: baseline and Week 1
Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.
baseline and Week 1
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 2
Time Frame: baseline and Week 2
Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.
baseline and Week 2
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 3
Time Frame: baseline and Week 3
Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.
baseline and Week 3
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 4
Time Frame: baseline and Week 4
Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.
baseline and Week 4
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 6
Time Frame: baseline and Week 6
Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.
baseline and Week 6
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 1
Time Frame: baseline and Week 1
Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.
baseline and Week 1
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 2
Time Frame: baseline and Week 2
Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.
baseline and Week 2
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 3
Time Frame: baseline and Week 3
Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.
baseline and Week 3
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 4
Time Frame: baseline and Week 4
Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.
baseline and Week 4
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 6
Time Frame: baseline and Week 6
Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.
baseline and Week 6
Patient Global Impression at Week 1
Time Frame: baseline and Week 1
Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).
baseline and Week 1
Patient Global Impression at Week 2
Time Frame: baseline and Week 2
Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).
baseline and Week 2
Patient Global Impression at Week 3
Time Frame: baseline and Week 3
Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).
baseline and Week 3
Patient Global Impression at Week 4
Time Frame: baseline and Week 4
Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).
baseline and Week 4
Patient Global Impression at Week 6
Time Frame: baseline and Week 6
Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).
baseline and Week 6
Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Orthostatic Reaction and Pulse Rate), and Serum Chemistry.
Time Frame: baseline and Week 6
baseline and Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe