T-score Comparability Between GE Lunar Prodigy and Norland Excel Densitometers (Wildwood)

October 1, 2015 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Differences in determining bone density scores have been found when comparing different bone density machines. Reducing differences between machines will improve diagnostic agreement for patients measured at different clinics. This study will test if this difference exists between the Norland Excel, such as the one at Wildwood Clinic, and the GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy at the UW Osteoporosis Clinical Research Center.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical and Research Program

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ambulatory women age ≥ 40 who have recently had a spine and hip DXA at the Wildwood Clinic on a Norland Excel densitometer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory women age 40 years and older
  • Recent spine and hip DXA at Wildwood clinic in Madison, WI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1
diagnosed with normal bone density by Norland Excel
2
diagnosed with osteopenia by Norland Excel densitometer
3
diagnosed with osteoporosis by Norland Excel densitometer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Spine and hip BMD and T-score measurements will be compared between densitometry machines.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neil Binkley, MD, University of Wisconsin - Institute on Aging

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2006-1053

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe