AV Fistula Salvage in Advanced CKD Using Sodium Bicarbonate Prophylaxis

September 18, 2018 updated by: MaineHealth

A Prospective Observational Study on the Use of Iodinated Contrast for AV Fistula Salvage in Stage 4/5 CKD Using Bicarbonate Prophylaxis

This is an observational study assessing the impact of conventional dose iodinated contrast on the renal function of advanced chronic kidney disease patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula evaluation using a standard sodium bicarbonate prophylaxis protocol. In addition, this model allows for pre and post procedure measurements of kidney function, providing a unique opportunity to assess the utility of novel biomarkers for contrast-induced kidney injury.

Our primary hypothesis is that there will be no change in serum creatinine post-procedure when using a standard sodium bicarbonate prophylaxis protocol. Our secondary hypothesis is that there will be no change in urinary kidney-injury marker-1 (KIM-1) post-procedure using a standard sodium bicarbonate prophylaxis protocol. In addition, we will assess the impact of different patient characteristics on the development of contrast-induced kidney injury, such as diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

The National Kidney Foundation publishes kidney disease outcome guidelines for improving care of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) patient. Regarding hemodialysis vascular access, the recommendation is for early placement of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) to improve morbidity and mortality outcomes, specifically when the glomerular filtration rate is less than 25ml/min, corresponding to stage 4 and 5 CKD. Despite its advantages, the need for surveillance of the AVF to determine maturation for use and maintain optimal longevity requires the use of interventional procedures. While radiocontrast use can lead to acute, often reversible kidney injury, its use in AVF evaluation has renewed interest with the recent implication of gadolinium-enhanced MRI being associated with a rare disorder of skin swelling and induration called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. CKD patients are particularly susceptible to long term adverse outcomes from contrast-induced kidney injury, with 1 year mortality in stage 4 and 5 CKD patients being 44% and 62%, respectively. While optimal fluid therapy to prevent contrast-induced kidney injury remains uncertain, several prospective randomized trials using sodium bicarbonate pretreatment have shown a lower incidence of contrast-related kidney injury compared to isotonic saline. Traditional markers of acute kidney injury, including serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine clearance have been insensitive in differentiating contrast-induced kidney injury from other forms of renal injury. Kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1) is a transmembrane receptor induced to very high levels in the proximal tubule of the nephron following ischemic and nephrotoxic injury. KIM-1 has been shown in a small cohort of patients to differentiate ischemic kidney injury from other forms of acute and chronic kidney disease.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maine
      • Portland, Maine, United States, 04101
        • Maine Medical Center - Brighton Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease patients with AV fistula placed but have not initiated dialysis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • >18 yrs age
  • chronic kidney disease, documented GFR<30ml/min by abbreviated MDRD calculation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatients
  • Pediatric patients
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • established dialysis patients
  • patients receiving iodinated contrast within 30 days of current procedure
  • patients with central arterial manipulation within 30 days of current procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Observation
Chronic kidney disease patients presenting for fisulta evaluation with documented GFR<30ml/min by abbreviated MDRD calculation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assess the impact of conventional dose iodinated contrast on the renal function of stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula evaluation using a standard sodium bicarbonate prophylaxis protocol.
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assess the impact of conventional dose iodinated contrast on urinary kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1) levels.
Time Frame: 3 hours and 48 hours
3 hours and 48 hours
Assess the impact of different patient characteristics on the development of contrast-induced kidney injury, such as diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.
Time Frame: Baseline patient charcteristics.
Baseline patient charcteristics.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott M Benson, D.O., Maine Medical Center - Division of Nephrology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe