- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00685932
Mobius® Post-cesarean Pain Randomized Control Trial
Mobius Pain Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Standard Versus Mobius® Retraction at Cesarean Delivery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, patient blinded trial of standard surgical retraction versus Mobius® retraction at cesarean delivery. Women will be approached by their provider at their 36 week prenatal visit regarding potential study participation. They will be given a letter describing the study. If a woman is interested, she will be contacted by a study nurse who will obtain informed consent. Ideally, women will be approached prior to the onset of labor or date of scheduled cesarean delivery so as to provide adequate time to review the study and ask questions. Women who undergo antenatal admission will be also approached by their provider regarding possible study participation and given a recruitment letter. If they are interested, then a study nurse will obtain informed consent.
Consenting women will be randomized after the decision to deliver by cesarean section is made. Randomization will be performed in blocks to control for scheduled versus unscheduled cesarean deliveries using a random numbers generator. Assignments will be kept in sequentially number opaque envelopes. Women will not be informed of their assignment until after discharge from the hospital. Efforts will be made in the operating room to avoid disclosing group assignment and the consent forms will not contain the specific name of the retractor under study. The operative team will be aware of group assignment.
Participants will complete a 7 item pain scale each post-operative day until discharge. This pain scale has been used in a pilot study and found to be accurate. The pain scale is a single page and takes less than 5 minutes to complete.
Charts will be reviewed to obtain clinical information which may have an impact on post-operative pain. This includes information about current and past substance abuse. Because of the increased amounts of post-operative pain experienced by women who use methadone during pregnancy, this group of women will be excluded from the study. To protect the information regarding substance abuse, a certificate of confidentiality has been obtained from the NIH.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Over 18 years old
- Potential for having a cesarean section (scheduled or unscheduled) at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years old
- Unable to consent due to language barrier or psychiatric illness
- Current methadone use for chronic pain
- Stat cesarean section
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control
This arm will be randomly assigned to have conventional retractions (ie Rich retractors and similar) used in the usual fashion during the cesarean procedure.
|
|
Experimental: Mobius
This arm will be randomized to have the providers who are performing the cesarean section use the Mobius retractor during the cesarean section procedure after the peritoneal cavity is opened.
|
The Mobius retractor is a dual ring elastic self retaining retractor that is inserted into the abdominal cavity after the peritoneal incision has been established.
It is then left in place during the hysterotomy incision, delivery of the fetus, hysterotomy repair, inspection and irrigation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Degree of Pain With Activity on Post-operative Day Number Two
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Visual analog scale (VAS) of pain with activity on a scale of 0-15cm with 0cm: No pain to 15cm: Severe pain.
|
2 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants Who Report Asymmetrical Pain on Second Post-operative Day After Cesarean Delivery
Time Frame: 2 days post-operation
|
Visual analog scale will be used to assess pain on the right or left side of the body with activity.VAS will use a 0-7.5cm range on the right and 0-7.5cm range on the left.
This scale is with 0 (or central mark) as no pain and increasing as the subject marks away from the central mark.
|
2 days post-operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michele Lauria, MD, MS, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rafique Z, Shibli KU, Russell IF, Lindow SW. A randomised controlled trial of the closure or non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: effect on post-operative pain. BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):694-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00153.x.
- Chanrachakul B, Hamontri S, Herabutya Y. A randomized comparison of postcesarean pain between closure and nonclosure of peritoneum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00503-6.
- Giacalone PL, Daures JP, Vignal J, Herisson C, Hedon B, Laffargue F. Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;99(5 Pt 1):745-50. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01957-9.
- Kadir RA, Khan A, Wilcock F, Chapman L. Is inferior dissection of the rectus sheath necessary during Pfannenstiel incision for lower segment Caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Sep-Oct;128(1-2):262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.02.018. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
- Nafisi S. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.10.009. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
- Dunn EA, O'Herlihy C. Comparison of maternal satisfaction following vaginal delivery after caesarean section and caesarean section after previous vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Jul 1;121(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.010.
- Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Postcesarean section pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jun;98(6):1422-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200306000-00018.
- Pan PH, Coghill R, Houle TT, Seid MH, Lindel WM, Parker RL, Washburn SA, Harris L, Eisenach JC. Multifactorial preoperative predictors for postcesarean section pain and analgesic requirement. Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):417-25. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00007.
- Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002 Jun;29(2):83-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00167.x.
- Dodd J, Pearce E, Crowther C. Women's experiences and preferences following Caesarean birth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Dec;44(6):521-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00300.x.
- McCarthy M Jr, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price DD, Jonasson O, Gibbs J, Fitzgibbons R, Neumayer L. Visual analog scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.034. Erratum In: J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Nov;201(5):826.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21107
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pregnancy
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompletedCornual PregnancyTaiwan
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalPeking Union Medical CollegeUnknownPregnancy | Pregnancy Related | Infant | Pregnancy Disease | Risk FactorChina
-
Ufuk UniversityNot yet recruitingPregnancy Complications | Pregnancy Loss | Pregnancy Preterm
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompletedProlonged PregnancyFrance
-
University Hospital, ToursCompleted
-
Technische Universität DresdenWithdrawnPregnancy Trimester, Second | Pregnancy Trimester, First | Pregnancy Trimester, ThirdGermany
-
Hopital Antoine BeclereUnknown
-
Turku University HospitalUniversity of TurkuCompleted
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselMerck Serono International SAUnknownPregnancy | Pregnancy LossBelgium
Clinical Trials on Mobius Retractor
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityApple Medical CorporationUnknownObesity | Cesarean SectionUnited States
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedSurgical Site Infection
-
St. Louis UniversityCompletedPregnancy | ObeseUnited States
-
Eastern Virginia Medical SchoolCompletedSleep Apnea, Obstructive | TonsillitisUnited States
-
Umraniye Education and Research HospitalUnknown
-
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Advocate Health CareActive, not recruiting
-
Belkin Laser Ltd.CompletedOAG - Open-Angle GlaucomaGeorgia
-
St. Louis UniversityTerminatedObese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section