The VA-STRIDE Study

April 6, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Expert System-Based Feedback in Sedentary Overweight Veterans

The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of an expert-system, print-based physical activity (PA) intervention delivered to Veterans receiving primary care at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (VAPHS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A.1 The primary aim of the study was to determine the effect of a physical activity intervention designed to increase physical activity for sedentary Veterans at VAPHS.

A.2. Secondary aims were to assess key health-related outcomes related to the intervention including health and quality of life. The specific outcomes were to (a) estimate the impact of the intervention on physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQL), weight, blood pressure, and serum lipids; and (b) characterize variation in intervention effectiveness by participant sociodemographic and health characteristics, such as age, race, and baseline health status.

232 Veterans were randomized to either the physical activity intervention group or the attention control group. Participants randomized to the physical activity intervention group participated in an individualized physical activity counseling session at baseline, conducted by an exercise physiologist, with guided goal setting to increase physical activity gradually to at least 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity. An additional 14 intervention counseling contacts, generated by participants' responses to physical activity questionnaires and individually tailored computer-generated expert system feedback messages based on stages of the motivational readiness for change model, were conducted via postal mail over the subsequent 12 months in parallel with routine primary care. Newsletters providing additional support and suggestions for increasing physical activity were also part of the mailed counseling contacts. Participants randomized to the attention control group participated in a generalized healthy lifestyle counseling session at baseline, conducted by a health educator, which included limited advice to become more physically active. Fourteen follow-up wellness newsletters that focused on healthy lifestyle issues other than physical activity were sent to participants via postal mail over the subsequent 12 months with the same frequency of contact as for the physical activity intervention group and in parallel with routine primary care. Assessment of effectiveness occurred at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

232

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
        • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years of age at the time of enrollment,
  • one or more primary care clinic visits at VAPHS in the 12 months prior to enrollment
  • overweight or obese, with a BMI > =25.0 kg/m^2 at the most recent primary care visit prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • primary care provider judgment that unsupervised moderate-intensity exercise will place the Veteran at risk of a cardiovascular event, or other safety concern for guided but unsupervised physical activity
  • Veteran is nonambulatory or requires assistive devices to ambulate (e.g., wheelchairs, prosthetic legs, canes or walkers),
  • Veteran regularly participates in moderate to brisk physical activity 60 minutes or more each week
  • current diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other comorbid conditions deemed to be contraindications for guided, unsupervised physical activity
  • self-reported blindness and/or unable to read printed material in English (e.g., a newspaper)
  • plans to move from the VAPHS treatment area in the next 12 months
  • unable or unwilling to travel to the study site 4 times during the 12-month study period
  • VAPHS employee
  • current participant in another interventional research study that may confound outcomes
  • unable or unwilling to provide signed, informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Physical Activity Intervention
Expert system-based physical activity counseling: Individualized baseline counseling and guided goal setting to increase physical activity gradually to at least 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity, with a 12-month follow-up via postal mail of 14 additional counseling contacts generated by responses to a physical activity questionnaire and individually tailored computer-generated expert system feedback messages for physical activity based on stages of the motivational readiness for change model
The intervention included 14 mailings to participants that involved completion of physical activity questionnaires printed on forms that were scanned into a computerized expert system program to generate individually-tailored feedback messages and related manuals based on the Stages of Motivational Readiness for Change Model. Newsletters providing additional support and suggestions for increasing physical activity were also part of the mailing program.
No Intervention: Attention Control
Generalized baseline healthy lifestyle education and suggestion to increase physical activity, with a 12-month follow-up via postal mail of 14 wellness newsletters focused on health issues other than physical activity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Moderate Intensity Physical Activity: Modified Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Month 0
Participants achieving 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity or greater physical activity at Month 0 as measured with the modified CHAMPS Questionnaire
Month 0
Moderate Intensity Physical Activity: Modified CHAMPS Questionnaire
Time Frame: Month 6
Participants achieving 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity or greater physical activity at Month 6 as measured with the modified CHAMPS Questionnaire
Month 6
Moderate Intensity Physical Activity: Modified CHAMPS Questionnaire
Time Frame: Month 12
Participants achieving 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity or greater physical activity at Month 12 as measured with the modified CHAMPS Questionnaire
Month 12
Moderate Intensity Physical Activity: Accelerometer
Time Frame: Month 0
Participants with an average of at least 30 minutes/day of moderate intensity or greater physical activity in a subset of the study population for whom accelerometer data were obtained: 97 of 116 in Physical Activity Intervention Group and 103 of 116 in Attention Control Group at Month 0
Month 0
Moderate Intensity Physical Activity: Accelerometer
Time Frame: Month 6
Participants with an average of at least 30 minutes/day of moderate intensity or greater physical activity in a subset of the study population for whom accelerometer data were obtained: 77 of 101 in Physical Activity Intervention Group and 76 of 107 in Attention Control Group in Month 6
Month 6
Moderate Intensity Physical Activity: Accelerometer
Time Frame: Month 12
Participants with an average of at least 30 minutes/day of moderate intensity or greater physical activity in a subset of the study population for whom accelerometer data were obtained: 71 of 98 in Physical Activity Intervention Group and 74 of 105 in Attention Control Group at Month 12
Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight
Time Frame: Month 0
Weight in kilograms (kg) measured at Month 0
Month 0
Weight
Time Frame: Month 6
Weight in kilograms at measured at Month 6
Month 6
Weight
Time Frame: Month 12
Weight in kilograms measured at Month 12
Month 12
Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Time Frame: Month 0
Systolic BP in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) measured at Month 0
Month 0
Systolic BP
Time Frame: Month 6
Systolic BP measured at Month 6
Month 6
Systolic BP
Time Frame: Month 12
Systolic BP measured at Month 12
Month 12
Diastolic BP
Time Frame: Month 0
Diastolic BP measured at Month 0
Month 0
Diastolic BP
Time Frame: Month 6
Diastolic BP measured at Month 6
Month 6
Diastolic BP
Time Frame: Month 12
Diastolic BP measured at Month 12
Month 12
Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Time Frame: Month 0
LDL cholesterol in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) measured at Month 0
Month 0
LDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Month 6
LDL cholesterol measured at Month 6
Month 6
LDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Month 12
LDL cholesterol measured at Month 12
Month 12
High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
Time Frame: Month 0
HDL cholesterol in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) measured at Month 0
Month 0
HDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Month 6
HDL cholesterol measured at Month 6
Month 6
HDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Month 12
HDL cholesterol measured at Month 12
Month 12
Triglycerides
Time Frame: Month 0
Triglycerides measured at Month 0
Month 0
Triglycerides
Time Frame: Month 6
Triglycerides measured at Month 6
Month 6
Triglycerides
Time Frame: Month 12
Triglycerides measured at Month 12
Month 12
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL): Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) Physical Component Summary Measure (PCS)
Time Frame: Month 0
HRQL: SF-36 PCS measured at Month 0. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The 8 scales are the weighted sums of the 2-10 questions in their section. Norm-based scoring, where each scale and component summary measures were scored to have the same average (50) and the same standard deviation (10 points), was used for reporting results in this study. Scores are interpreted as the lower the score the more disability; conversely, the higher the score the less disability. The PCS aggregates the scales for bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical functioning, and role limitation due to physical health problems.
Month 0
HRQL: SF-36 PCS
Time Frame: Month 6
HRQL: SF-36 PCS measured at Month 6. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The 8 scales are the weighted sums of the 2-10 questions in their section. Norm-based scoring, where each scale and component summary measures were scored to have the same average (50) and the same standard deviation (10 points), was used for reporting results in this study. Scores are interpreted as the lower the score the more disability; conversely, the higher the score the less disability. The PCS aggregates the scales for bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical functioning, and role limitation due to physical health problems.
Month 6
HRQL: SF-36 PCS
Time Frame: Month 12
HRQL: SF-36 PCS measured at Month 12. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The 8 scales are the weighted sums of the 2-10 questions in their section. Norm-based scoring, where each scale and component summary measures were scored to have the same average (50) and the same standard deviation (10 points), was used for reporting results in this study. Scores are interpreted as the lower the score the more disability; conversely, the higher the score the less disability. The PCS aggregates the scales for bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical functioning, and role limitation due to physical health problems.
Month 12
HRQL: SF-36 Mental Component Summary Measure (MSC)
Time Frame: Month 0
HRQL: SF-36 MCS measured at Month 0. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The 8 scales are the weighted sums of the 2-10 questions in their section. Norm-based scoring, where each scale and component summary measures were scored to have the same average (50) and the same standard deviation (10 points), was used for reporting results in this study. Scores are interpreted as the lower the score the more disability; conversely, the higher the score the less disability. The MCS aggregates the scales for vitality, mental health, social functioning, and role limitations due to personal or emotional problems.
Month 0
HRQL: SF-36 MCS
Time Frame: Month 6
HRQL: SF-36 MCS measured at Month 6. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The 8 scales are the weighted sums of the 2-10 questions in their section. Norm-based scoring, where each scale and component summary measures were scored to have the same average (50) and the same standard deviation (10 points), was used for reporting results in this study. Scores are interpreted as the lower the score the more disability; conversely, the higher the score the less disability. The MCS aggregates the scales for vitality, mental health, social functioning, and role limitations due to personal or emotional problems.
Month 6
HRQL: SF-36 MCS
Time Frame: Month 12
HRQL: SF-36 MCS measured at Month 12. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The 8 scales are the weighted sums of the 2-10 questions in their section. Norm-based scoring, where each scale and component summary measures were scored to have the same average (50) and the same standard deviation (10 points), was used for reporting results in this study. Scores are interpreted as the lower the score the more disability; conversely, the higher the score the less disability. The MCS aggregates the scales for vitality, mental health, social functioning, and role limitations due to personal or emotional problems.
Month 12
Physical Function: 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
Time Frame: Month 0
Physical Function: 6MWD in meters measured at Month 0
Month 0
Physical Function: 6MWD
Time Frame: Month 6
Physical Function: 6MWD measured at Month 6
Month 6
Physical Function: 6MWD
Time Frame: Month 12
Physical Function: 6MWD measured at Month 12
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary Ann Sevick, ScD MS, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 07-154

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Expert system-based physical activity counseling

3
Subscribe