Electroencephalography (EEG) Biomarkers of Response in Depression

September 23, 2008 updated by: University of California, Los Angeles

EEG Biomarkers of Response in Depression

There are two specific aims of this project:

  1. To identify physiologic indicators of venlafaxine treatment response using quantitative EEG (QEEG) cordance, and to determine if cordance changes are specifically associated with response to venlafaxine
  2. To identify predictors of placebo response in major depression using QEEG cordance/bispectral index (BIS) and neuropsychological testing

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Our previous work indicates that a combination of neurophysiologic, symptom, and cognitive measures may predict response more accurately than brain functional measures alone. The purpose of this study is to replicate results from our earlier work using a similar study design (96-06-291-11), and also to prospectively gather additional information to substantiate that a more comprehensive approach to subject assessment will yield more accurate and reproducible prediction of treatment response.

One of the major challenges involved in clinical trials for major depressive disorder (MDD) is that of placebo response. The placebo response rate has been estimated at 20 - 50% of those subjects who enter a standard clinical trial for MDD. This high rate of response to placebo, which may not differ substantially from the response rate to medication, can make it difficult to demonstrate the efficacy of new antidepressant compounds. Identification of MDD subjects with a placebo responder (PR) phenotype, either at the beginning or end of a clinical trial, could have two major potential benefits. First, identification of placebo responders prior to enrollment in a clinical trial might make it possible to have restrictive entry criteria, excluding such subjects from the trial. Segregation of PR phenotype subjects a priori could reduce variance in the outcome data and increase the drug-placebo difference. This exclusion could reduce the number of subjects required for clinical trials and render the trials more efficient. Second, identification of a PR phenotype during a clinical trial could make it possible to distinguish "true medication" from placebo response. This distinction could make it possible to identify subgroups in the trial, enhancing precision in the study of medication effects.

Our research group has performed a series of placebo-controlled treatment trials in MDD and has used a combination of behavioral ratings, self-report, and neurophysiologic measurements with quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) to identify predictors of both placebo response and medication response. The preliminary results from previous studies suggest that a combination of neurophysiologic, symptom, and cognitive measures may be useful for pretreatment prediction and/or early treatment detection of different types of treatment response.

In this study our primary goal is to assess the neurophysiologic, behavioral, and cognitive assessments of subjects with MDD in the setting of a clinical trial to replicate prospectively these initial results and more completely identify the characteristics of different types of treatment response in a clinical trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90024
        • UCLA Laboratory of Brain, Behavior, and Pharmacology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects will meet DSM-IV criteria for depression on the basis of a SCID-P interview, with subjects having a score on the 17-item Ham-D > 17 (with item #1 > 2).
  • Subjects will meet criteria both at recruitment and after a one-week single blind placebo wash-in. Study includes outpatients only.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects will have no serious medical illness. The investigators will exclude patients also meeting criteria for the following groups of axis I diagnoses:

    • delirium or dementia
    • substance-related disorders
    • schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, or eating disorders.
  • In addition, patients meeting criteria for cluster A or B axis II diagnoses will be excluded.
  • Subjects with a history of current or past active suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 2
Matching capsules containing placebo 37.5 mg. WERE prepared by the UCLA Pharmacy for the initial phase of the study. After a one-week placebo lead-in, subjects WERE randomly assigned to receive one capsule of either venlafaxine or placebo, with the dosage increase every two days until subjects received four capsules daily (subjects achieved a dose of 150 mg. of venlafaxine after 10 days). The first dose was administered in the morning, with subsequent capsules added on a b.i.d. schedule.
Active Comparator: 1
VENLAFAXINE
Matching capsules containing venlafaxine 37.5 mg. WERE prepared by the UCLA Pharmacy for the initial phase of the study. After a one-week placebo lead-in, subjects WERE randomly assigned to receive one capsule of either venlafaxine or placebo, with the dosage increase every two days until subjects received four capsules daily (subjects achieved a dose of 150 mg. of venlafaxine after 10 days). The first dose was administered in the morning, with subsequent capsules added on a b.i.d. schedule.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ian A Cook, MD, Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2008

Last Verified

September 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on venlafaxine (Effexor)

3
Subscribe