Open-Label, Safety and Tolerability Extension Study of KNS-760704 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) (CL211) (CL211)

July 22, 2021 updated by: Knopp Biosciences

An Open-Label, Safety and Tolerability, Study Evaluating KNS-760704 in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

This is an open-label, multi-center study designed to extend the evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and clinical effects of oral administration of KNS-760704 in patients with ALS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients who complete the Part 2 Week 28 visit in study KNS-760704-CL201 and patients with ALS who were actively receiving RTPB [(6R)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-N6-propyl-2,6-benzothiazolediamine dihydro-chloride monohydrate] under Research IND #60,948 were eligible to participate in this study.

Eligible patients received 1 tablet of KNS-760704 (150 mg) every 12 hours (Q12H) (300 mg total daily dose) for up to 180 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA, Dept. of Neurology - Neuromuscular/ALS Research Center
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • The Forbes Norris MDA/ALS Research Center
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21228
        • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Massachusettes General Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68506
        • Bryan LGH Medical Center East
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University, Lou Gehrig MDA/ALS Research Center
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • SUNY Upstate Medical University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Hershey Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102
        • Drexel University College of Medicine
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas Health Sciences Center of San Antonio
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Health System
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has provided signed informed consent for this trial before the commencement of any study-related procedure
  2. Patient is actively participating in Knopp Protocol KNS-760704-CL201 and has completed the Part 2 Week 28 visit in that study or patient is actively receiving RTPB under Research IND #60,948

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient did not participate in Knopp Protocol KNS-760704-CL201 or patient did not receive RTPB under Research IND #60,948.
  2. Patient discontinued from KNS-760704-CL201 for any reason other than enrollment into this study (applies to patients enrolled in KNS-760704-CL201 only)
  3. Patient was not taking RTPB under Research IND #60,948 prior to April 30, 2009 (applies to patients enrolled under Research IND #60,948 only)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: KNS-760704 300 mg/day
Open-label KNS-760704 (150 mg Q12H)
150 mg Q12H KNS-760704 given orally (300 mg total daily dose)
Other Names:
  • dexpramipexole

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Hematology Results
Time Frame: 180 weeks
Number of Participants with Potentially Clinically Significant Hematology Results by Treatment Group. Percentages based on number of patients with at least one non-missing post-baseline value in each treatment group. Patients are only counted once per criterion per laboratory test.
180 weeks
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Liver Enzyme Abnormalities
Time Frame: 180 weeks
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant liver enzyme abnormalities for the safety population are presented. Percentages are based on the number of patients with at least one non-missing, post-baseline value for each parameter.
180 weeks
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically ECG Abnormalities
Time Frame: 180 weeks
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities for the safety population are presented. Percentages are based on the number of patients in the safety population who had at least one non-missing, post-baseline value.
180 weeks
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Time Frame: 180 weeks
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities for the safety population are presented. Percentages are based on the number of patients with at least one non-missing, post-baseline value for each parameter.
180 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ALSFRS-R (ALS Functional Rating Scale With Respiratory Component) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The ALSFRS-R (ALS functional rating scale with respiratory component) is a validated scale which measures 4 functional domains, comprising respiratory function, bulbar function, gross motor skills, and fine motor skills. There are a total of 12 questions, each scored from 0 to 4 for a total possible score of 48. Therefore, the score ranges from 0 to 48 with higher scores representing better function.
12 weeks
Change in ALSFRS-R (ALS Functional Rating Scale With Respiratory Component) Total Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The ALSFRS-R (ALS functional rating scale with respiratory component) is a validated scale which measures 4 functional domains, comprising respiratory function, bulbar function, gross motor skills, and fine motor skills. There are a total of 12 questions, each scored from 0 to 4 for a total possible score of 48. Therefore, the score ranges from 0 to 48 with higher scores representing better function.
24 weeks
Change in ALSFRS-R (ALS Functional Rating Scale With Respiratory Component) Total Score From Baseline to Week 48
Time Frame: 48 weeks
The ALSFRS-R (ALS functional rating scale with respiratory component) is a validated scale which measures 4 functional domains, comprising respiratory function, bulbar function, gross motor skills, and fine motor skills. There are a total of 12 questions, each scored from 0 to 4 for a total possible score of 48. Therefore, the score ranges from 0 to 48 with higher scores representing better function.
48 weeks
Change in Upright Vital Capacity From Baseline to Week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change in Percent Predicted Upright Vital Capacity from Baseline to Week 12. A negative change indicates clinical worsening.
12 weeks
Change in Upright Vital Capacity From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in Percent Predicted Upright Vital Capacity from Baseline to Week 24. A negative change indicates clinical worsening.
24 weeks
Change in Upright Vital Capacity From Baseline to Week 48
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Change in Percent Predicted Upright Vital Capacity from Baseline to Week 48. A negative change indicates clinical worsening.
48 weeks
Change in McGill Single-Item Scale (SIS) From Baseline to Week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The McGill SIS consists of a single question designed to assess the improvement of or the rate of deterioration of the subject's quality-of-life. Subjects rated their quality of life over the prior 2 days on a scale of 0 (very bad) to 10 (excellent). Decreases from Baseline indicate deterioration of a subject's quality of life.
12 weeks
Change in McGill Single-Item Scale (SIS) From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The McGill SIS consists of a single question designed to assess the improvement of or the rate of deterioration of the subject's quality-of-life. Subjects rated their quality of life over the prior 2 days on a scale of 0 (very bad) to 10 (excellent). Decreases from Baseline indicate deterioration of a subject's quality of life.
24 weeks
Change in McGill Single-Item Scale (SIS) From Baseline to Week 48
Time Frame: 48 weeks
The McGill SIS consists of a single question designed to assess the improvement of or the rate of deterioration of the subject's quality-of-life. Subjects rated their quality of life over the prior 2 days on a scale of 0 (very bad) to 10 (excellent). Decreases from Baseline indicate deterioration of a subject's quality of life.
48 weeks
Number of Subjects With Feeding Tube Placed During the Study.
Time Frame: 144 weeks
Number of participants who had a feeding tube placed during the study.
144 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Merit Cudkowicz, M.D., MSc, NeuroClinical Trials Unit (Massachusetts General Hospital)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe