The Use of FLOSEAL to Reduce Bleeding in Total Knee Replacement Surgery

November 10, 2017 updated by: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

The Role of a Topical Hemostatic Agent in Reducing Blood Loss in Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study is to determine if the agent, Floseal, can decrease the amount of blood patients lose after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. If this product can be found to have an effect on bleeding, it may potentially reduce the problems associated with bleeding after knee replacement surgery such as pain, stiffness, and the need to have a blood transfusion. The subject's overall participation will be over a period of 6 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective double blind randomized clinical trial of patients requiring unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The patients will be randomized intra-operatively to receiving Floseal or no treatment.

Both the patient and the observers will be blinded to whether the subject received Floseal or no treatment. Only the operating surgeons will be aware of whether Floseal or no treatment was given.

As was performed in the pilot study, randomization of Floseal or no treatment will be performed using the sealed envelope technique. Randomization will occur at the time of surgery. The statistician is responsible for maintaining the randomization schedule and issuing the sealed envelopes. The inner envelope will contain whether Floseal or no treatment is to be given on a card which will be counter-signed by the surgeon at the time of surgery. The inner envelope will then be sealed, followed by sealing of the outer envelope. Following the procedure, the surgeon will then take the sealed and signed envelope to surgeon who will store and file it in a locked cabinet in his office. The patients study number will be on the outside surface of the envelopes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single Knee replacement for arthritis of the knee

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No inflammatory arthritis (ie. Rheumatoid arthritis)
  • No allergies to cow meat (bovine allergies
  • No history of bleeding disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
No intervention.
Experimental: Hemostatic Matrix
2 vials of Floseal applied once at the end of surgery
FloSeal will be administered following the cementing of all knee components. Prior to release of the tourniquet and after the cement has cured, it will be applied to cut, exposed bone ends as well as the intra-articular soft tissues by the use of a delivery syringe, Direct manual pressure with a gauze sponge will be applied following its application for 2 minutes, ensuring that it adheres to the bleeding bone surface.
Other Names:
  • "FloSeal", a thrombin and collagen based agent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Hemoglobin on Day 0 Compared to Preoperatively
Time Frame: preoperatively and on the day of surgery
preoperatively and on the day of surgery
Change in Hemoglobin On Day 1 Compared to Preoperatively
Time Frame: preoperatively and one day after surgery
preoperatively and one day after surgery
Change in Hemoglobin on Day 2 Compared to Preoperatively
Time Frame: preoperatively and two days after surgery
preoperatively and two days after surgery
Change in Hematocrit on Day 2 Compared to Preoperatively
Time Frame: preoperatively and two days after surgery
preoperatively and two days after surgery
Change in Hemoglobin on Day 0 Compared to Preoperatively
Time Frame: preoperatively and day of surgery
preoperatively and day of surgery
Change in Hematocrit on Day 1 Compared to Preoperatively
Time Frame: preoperatively and 1 day after surgery
preoperatively and 1 day after surgery
Drain Output
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours postoperatively
Autologous Amount of Transfusion
Time Frame: three days postoperatively
three days postoperatively
Homologous Amount of Transfusion
Time Frame: three days postoperatively
three days postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of Motion on Day 3
Time Frame: 3days postoperatively
3days postoperatively
Visual Analog Pain Scale on Day 3
Time Frame: 3 days postoperatively

A VAS is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that cannot easily be measured.

The pain VAS scale measures pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

3 days postoperatively
Range of Motion at Six Weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
6 weeks postoperatively
Visual Analog Pain Scale at 6 Weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

A VAS is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that cannot easily be measured.

The pain VAS scale measures pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

6 weeks postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark P Figgie, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 26078

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe