AZD9668 Relative Bioavailability

February 4, 2010 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Phase I Open-label, Single-centre, Two Cohort Crossover Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability After Oral Administration of AZD9668 Free Base Dosed as a Suspension Compared to AZD9669 Tosylate Salt Dosed as a Tablet

The study is designed to investigate the pharmacokinetic behaviour of the free base formulation of AZD9668. The study will compared the relative bioavailability of the free base formulation at two different dose levels compared to the tosylate salt formulation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures
  • female subjects may be of non-child bearing potential (i.e. post menopausal or surgically sterile).
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.0 and ≤ 30.0 kg/m2 calculated from height and weight at the screening visit; minimum weight 50 kg.
  • Clinically normal physical and laboratory findings as judged by the investigator, including negative test results for drug-of-abuse, alcohol, cotinine and negative test results for Hepatitis B surface antigen, antibodies to Hepatitis C virus and antibodies to HIV-1/2 at the screening visit
  • Be a none smoker or ex-smoker who has stopped smoking for >6 months prior to visit 2 (pre-entry)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any clinically significant disease or disorder (eg infections/viral disease, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, liver, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, endocrine, metabolic, malignant, psychiatric, major physical impairment), which in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk because of participation in the study, or influence the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs.
  • Any clinically relevant abnormal findings in physical examination, vital signs, clinical chemistry, haematology, urinalysis, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the subject at risk because of his/her participation in the study
  • History of cardiac arrhythmia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
tosylate salt tablet
20 mg
60 mg
Experimental: 2
free suspension
20 mg
60 mg
Experimental: 3
tosylate salt tablet
20 mg
60 mg
Experimental: 4
free suspension
20 mg
60 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Relative bioavailability (Frel): to assess the relative systemic bioavailability after oral administration of the free base of AZD9668 dosed as a suspension compared to the tosylate salt of AZD9668 dosed as a tablet formulation at two dose levels.
Time Frame: Frequent sampling occasions during the study
Frequent sampling occasions during the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety variables (adverse events, blood pressure, pulse rate, 12-lead ECG, haematology, clinical chemistry and urinalysis)
Time Frame: Frequent sampling occasions during the study
Frequent sampling occasions during the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Emma Harrop, AstraZeneca R&D

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2010

Last Verified

February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • D0520C00017

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on AZD9668

Subscribe