Apnea, Bariatric Surgery Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Trial (ABC)

May 24, 2019 updated by: Sanjay R Patel, University of Pittsburgh

A Randomized Trial of Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Sleep Apnea

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a comparative effectiveness study comparing a medical versus surgical approach to the initial management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the setting of obesity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most common complications of obesity, resulting in excessive sleepiness and daytime functional impairment as well as acting synergistically with obesity in predisposing to hypertension, insulin resistance, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and stroke. The current first line treatment for moderate to severe OSA, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is extremely effective but is often not well tolerated, leading to low adherence rates in many patients. Bariatric surgery has been approved as treatment for OSA in patients with co-morbid obesity and in small studies, appears to produce substantial improvements. However, no trials directly comparing bariatric procedures with standard CPAP treatment yet exist to guide clinicians and patients in choosing the most appropriate first line treatment. This trial will address the feasibility and safety, and estimate the effect sizes for a subsequent Phase 3 trial. We will recruit 80 patients with severe OSA and morbid obesity (body mass index, BMI, of 35-45 kg/m2) from two large clinical sleep programs that together care for a wide spectrum and demographically diverse group of OSA patients. After establishing patient and physician equipoise, subjects will be randomized to a trial of CPAP or laparoscopic gastric banding as first line treatment for OSA. The primary outcome measures will be improvement in OSA severity under both ideal and real life conditions (i.e., in the CPAP arm, while using CPAP in a controlled environment vs. while using prescribed therapy in the usual home environment, respectively), which will allow for assessments of both comparative efficacy and effectiveness. Outcomes will be assessed at 9 months to quantify the early effectiveness of each treatment strategy as well as to demonstrate clinical equipoise in conducting a future larger long term trial using these two arms. Further follow-up will occur at 18 months in a subset of 40 patients to determine effect sizes for the subsequent study at a point where the bariatric arm has neared a plateau in weight. Secondary outcomes will include patient-related outcomes including sleepiness, quality of life, and an index of health service utilization. In addition, changes in biomarkers related to inflammation, insulin resistance, lipids, blood pressure, and arterial stiffness will be assessed in each group, and in relationship to changes in BMI and OSA, to identify promising outcome measures for future trials. Incurred costs will be collected in all subjects in order to establish the parameters needed for a cost effectiveness analysis. This pilot study will represent the first controlled comparison of medical and surgical treatments for OSA and in addition, will provide the necessary data to develop the optimal study design for a subsequent long term multi-center comparative effectiveness study to better understand the potential role that bariatric surgery may offer in the management of OSA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe sleep apnea with at least 1 referable symptom
  • Obesity (BMI 35-45 kg/m2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior use of CPAP within the last two years or prior bariatric surgery
  • Hypoxemia or hypercapnia
  • Elevated peri-operative risk
  • Drowsy driving in past year
  • Unstable medical or psychiatric conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Laparoscopic Gastric Banding
Those randomized to surgery would meet with the bariatric surgeon and the dietitian during the 3 month weight management period and based on insurance requirements, would undergo LGB surgery after 3 months of weight management. PAP therapy would be utilized for the 3 week peri-operative period (1 week prior to 2 weeks post-operatively) given evidence that this might reduce peri-operative respiratory complications. Routine surgical follow-up will occur 2 weeks post-operatively and then every 4-6 weeks to assess weight loss trajectory and adjust the band as needed.
Active Comparator: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Participants randomized to the CPAP arm will undergo a CPAP titration within 2 weeks of enrollment unless a split-night study was already performed as part of their diagnostic polysomnogram (PSG) providing a reliable CPAP therapeutic pressure. As soon as an appropriate pressure is identified, CPAP therapy will begin with routinely scheduled follow-up visits to maximize CPAP adherence. All participants will be offered a 12 month supervised weight loss program in addition to OSA-specific therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effective Apnea Hypopnea Index
Time Frame: 9 months
The Effective Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) is the actual frequency of apneas and hypopneas per hour that the patient is exposed to. It is calculated as the AHI while on CPAP times the proportion of sleep time that CPAP was used plus the AHI off CPAP times the proportion of sleep time that CPAP is not used.
9 months
Epworth Sleepiness Score
Time Frame: 9 months
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale results in scores ranging from 0-24, where scores of 0-10 indicate normal levels of sleepiness while 11-24 indicate excessive daytime sleepiness.
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Insulin Resistance (HOMA Index)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index
Time Frame: 9 months
The Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index results in scores ranging from 1-7, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life.
9 months
Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Time Frame: 9 months
The PHQ-9 is scored from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
9 months
Direct Health Care Costs
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Mean 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sanjay R Patel, M.D., M.S., University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Gastric Banding

Subscribe