Observational Study Of The Long-Term Effect Of Macugen In Patients With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (MACULA)

January 12, 2011 updated by: Pfizer

Long-Term Non-Interventional Study (AB Study) To Investigate The Efficacy And Safety Of Macugen® In Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Conditions Of Routine Clinical Practice

Long-term observational study to assess the safety, efficacy and quality of life of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) under Macugen treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ophthalmologists who are experienced in doing intravitreal injections in Germany

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1001

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Macugen
Dosage recommendations for MACUGEN took place on the basis of the approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and were adjusted solely according to medical practice. MACUGEN® is available as pre-filled syringe containing 0.3 mg MACUGEN® in 90 µL injection solution for intravitreal injection. Macugen injections were documented to reflect the routine clinical practice. Follow-up visits were only carried out and documented if they took place as part of the standard medical treatment for the respective case and were necessary for medical and/or therapeutic reasons.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Acuity (VA)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
VA measured at each follow-up visit as the number of lines read on a standard eye chart (Snellen or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [EDTRS]) using a 5 meter distance, 1 meter distance, or verifying if participant was able to count fingers, perceive hand motion, or light. Follow-up visits occurred only if considered part of standard medical treatment. The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 2: first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25): Overall Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to Month 24 or early termination
Participant-reported vision-related functioning and quality of life measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ-25. Converted scale 0-100 where higher score represented better functioning: General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain: 4,19; Near Vision: 5,6,7; Distance Vision: 8,9,14; Social Functioning: 11,13; Mental Health Activities: 3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties: 17,18; Dependency: 20,23,24; Driving: 15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.
Baseline, every 6 months up to Month 24 or early termination
Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
Investigator's categorical assessment of the efficacy of Macugen (pegaptanib) treatment at the final visit or termination of therapy; Categories included Very Good, Good, Moderate, and Poor.
Month 24 or early termination
Lesion Size (Number of Optic Disc Areas)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
Lesion size measured by Investigator after each injection as part of standard of care (SOC), using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Reported as the number of optic-disk areas, each of which were 2.54 millimeters squared (mm^2). Lesion size included choroidal neovascularization, exudation area, and hemorrhage, if present. The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 6
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 12
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 18
Time Frame: Week 18
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 18
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 24
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 30
Time Frame: Week 30
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 30
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 36
Time Frame: Week 36
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 36
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 42
Time Frame: Week 42
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 42
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 48
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 54
Time Frame: Week 54
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 54
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 60
Time Frame: Week 60
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 12, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 60
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 66
Time Frame: Week 66
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 13, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 66
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 72
Time Frame: Week 72
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 14, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Week 72
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Last Visit
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at the Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity. Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.
Month 24 or early termination
Number of Participants With Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
PED assessed by Investigator at baseline as part of SOC for participants with age-related macular degeneration; Standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Baseline
Number of Participants With PED at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 6
Number of Participants With PED at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 12
Number of Participants With PED at Week 18
Time Frame: Week 18
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 18
Number of Participants With PED at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 24
Number of Participants With PED at Week 30
Time Frame: Week 30
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 30
Number of Participants With PED at Week 36
Time Frame: Week 36
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 36
Number of Participants With PED at Week 42
Time Frame: Week 42
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 42
Number of Participants With PED at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 48
Number of Participants With PED at Week 54
Time Frame: Week 54
PED assessed by Investigator Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Week 54
Number of Participants With PED at Last Visit
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
PED assessed by Investigator at Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent. Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.
Month 24 or early termination
Central Retinal Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
Central retinal thickness assessed by Investigator every 6 weeks, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (optical coherence tomography) and reported as mean central retinal thickness. The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Baseline, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Baseline
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 6
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 12
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 18
Time Frame: Week 18
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 18
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 24
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 30
Time Frame: Week 30
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent (%) classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 30
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 36
Time Frame: Week 36
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 36
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 42
Time Frame: Week 42
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 42
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 48
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 54
Time Frame: Week 54
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Week 54
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Last Visit
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at the Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic). Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.
Month 24 or early termination

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to First Adverse Event (AE)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
Time to first AE during the study evaluated by Kaplan-Meier Product-limit methods. AE:any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product or medical device in the context of study; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage.
Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
Number of Participants With Complications Associated With Injection
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
Complications associated with injection during the study with onset at or after date of first injection was recorded by the Investigator.
Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
Treatment Tolerability
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
Investigator's overall evaluation of tolerability; Categories included: Very Good, Good, Moderate, and Poor.
Month 24 or early termination
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
IOP measured at each visit using either applanation tonometry or non-contact before intraviterial injection, reported as pre-dose pressure of treated eye in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: IOP before any injection; Visit 2: IOP before first injection; Visit 3: IOP before second injection.
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
Change in IOP Between Predose and Postdose Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
IOP measured at each visit using either applanation tonometry or non-contact before and after intraviterial injection. Change in IOP equals postdose IOP minus predose IOP.
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
IOP Mean Difference (Within a Participant)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
Average predose minus postdose mean difference in IOP within a participant
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2011

Last Verified

January 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe