- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01245387
Observational Study Of The Long-Term Effect Of Macugen In Patients With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (MACULA)
January 12, 2011 updated by: Pfizer
Long-Term Non-Interventional Study (AB Study) To Investigate The Efficacy And Safety Of Macugen® In Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Conditions Of Routine Clinical Practice
Long-term observational study to assess the safety, efficacy and quality of life of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) under Macugen treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Ophthalmologists who are experienced in doing intravitreal injections in Germany
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
1001
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Macugen
|
Dosage recommendations for MACUGEN took place on the basis of the approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and were adjusted solely according to medical practice.
MACUGEN® is available as pre-filled syringe containing 0.3 mg MACUGEN® in 90 µL injection solution for intravitreal injection.
Macugen injections were documented to reflect the routine clinical practice.
Follow-up visits were only carried out and documented if they took place as part of the standard medical treatment for the respective case and were necessary for medical and/or therapeutic reasons.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Acuity (VA)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
VA measured at each follow-up visit as the number of lines read on a standard eye chart (Snellen or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [EDTRS]) using a 5 meter distance, 1 meter distance, or verifying if participant was able to count fingers, perceive hand motion, or light.
Follow-up visits occurred only if considered part of standard medical treatment.
The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 2: first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).
|
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25): Overall Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to Month 24 or early termination
|
Participant-reported vision-related functioning and quality of life measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ-25.
Converted scale 0-100 where higher score represented better functioning: General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain: 4,19; Near Vision: 5,6,7; Distance Vision: 8,9,14; Social Functioning: 11,13; Mental Health Activities: 3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties: 17,18; Dependency: 20,23,24; Driving: 15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.
|
Baseline, every 6 months up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
|
Investigator's categorical assessment of the efficacy of Macugen (pegaptanib) treatment at the final visit or termination of therapy; Categories included Very Good, Good, Moderate, and Poor.
|
Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Lesion Size (Number of Optic Disc Areas)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
Lesion size measured by Investigator after each injection as part of standard of care (SOC), using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Reported as the number of optic-disk areas, each of which were 2.54 millimeters squared (mm^2).
Lesion size included choroidal neovascularization, exudation area, and hemorrhage, if present.
The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).
|
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 6
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 18
Time Frame: Week 18
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 18
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 24
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 30
Time Frame: Week 30
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 30
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 36
Time Frame: Week 36
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 36
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 42
Time Frame: Week 42
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 42
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 48
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 54
Time Frame: Week 54
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 54
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 60
Time Frame: Week 60
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 12, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 60
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 66
Time Frame: Week 66
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 13, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 66
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 72
Time Frame: Week 72
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 14, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
|
Week 72
|
|
Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Last Visit
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
|
Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at the Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.
Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.
|
Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Number of Participants With Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
PED assessed by Investigator at baseline as part of SOC for participants with age-related macular degeneration; Standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Baseline
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 6
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 18
Time Frame: Week 18
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 18
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 24
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 30
Time Frame: Week 30
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 30
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 36
Time Frame: Week 36
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 36
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 42
Time Frame: Week 42
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 42
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 48
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Week 54
Time Frame: Week 54
|
PED assessed by Investigator Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
|
Week 54
|
|
Number of Participants With PED at Last Visit
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
|
PED assessed by Investigator at Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.
Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.
|
Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Central Retinal Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
Central retinal thickness assessed by Investigator every 6 weeks, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (optical coherence tomography) and reported as mean central retinal thickness.
The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).
|
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Baseline, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Baseline
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 6
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 18
Time Frame: Week 18
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 18
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent [%] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 24
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 30
Time Frame: Week 30
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent (%) classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 30
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 36
Time Frame: Week 36
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 36
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 42
Time Frame: Week 42
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 42
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 48
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 54
Time Frame: Week 54
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
|
Week 54
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Last Visit
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
|
Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at the Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).
Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.
|
Month 24 or early termination
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Adverse Event (AE)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
|
Time to first AE during the study evaluated by Kaplan-Meier Product-limit methods.
AE:any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product or medical device in the context of study; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage.
|
Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Number of Participants With Complications Associated With Injection
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
|
Complications associated with injection during the study with onset at or after date of first injection was recorded by the Investigator.
|
Baseline up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Treatment Tolerability
Time Frame: Month 24 or early termination
|
Investigator's overall evaluation of tolerability; Categories included: Very Good, Good, Moderate, and Poor.
|
Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
IOP measured at each visit using either applanation tonometry or non-contact before intraviterial injection, reported as pre-dose pressure of treated eye in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: IOP before any injection; Visit 2: IOP before first injection; Visit 3: IOP before second injection.
|
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
Change in IOP Between Predose and Postdose Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
IOP measured at each visit using either applanation tonometry or non-contact before and after intraviterial injection.
Change in IOP equals postdose IOP minus predose IOP.
|
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
|
IOP Mean Difference (Within a Participant)
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
Average predose minus postdose mean difference in IOP within a participant
|
Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
August 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 19, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
November 22, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 13, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 12, 2011
Last Verified
January 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A5751021
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.