Investigation of the Superiority Effect of Orally Disintegrating Desmopressin Tablets to Placebo in Terms of Night Voids Reduction in Nocturia Adult Male Patients

September 16, 2015 updated by: Ferring Pharmaceuticals

A Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial With an Open-label Extension to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of Desmopressin Orally Disintegrating Tablets for the Treatment of Nocturia in Adult Males

The purpose of this trial was to confirm/establish long-term safety and efficacy of desmopressin orally disintegrating tablets at dose levels of 50 μg and 75 μg and to further evaluate the safety of an efficacious higher dose level of 100 μg in males with nocturia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

395

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
        • Can-Med Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Ontario
      • Barrie, Ontario, Canada
        • The Male/ Female Health and Research Centre
      • Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
        • Urology Associates / Urologic Medical Research
      • North Bay, Ontario, Canada
        • Investigational Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
    • Alabama
      • Anniston, Alabama, United States
        • Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States
        • Medical Affiliated Research Center, Inc.
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
      • Tempe, Arizona, United States
        • Premiere Pharmaceutical Research
    • California
      • Foothill Rance, California, United States
        • Family Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
        • Axis Clinical Trials
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
        • Genitourinary Surgical Consultants
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
      • Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
        • Front Range Clinical Research, LLC
    • Connecticut
      • Middlebury, Connecticut, United States
        • Connecticut Clinical Research Center, LLC
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States
        • South Florida Medical Research
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States
        • Women's Medical Research Group, LLC
      • DeLand, Florida, United States
        • Avail Clinical Research, LLC
      • Kissimmee, Florida, United States
        • FPA Clinical Research
      • Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States
        • Sunrise Medical Research
      • Miami, Florida, United States
        • Advanced Pharma CR, LLC
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
        • DMI Research
      • St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
        • Pinellas Urology, Inc
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
        • Midtown Medical Center
      • Trinity, Florida, United States
        • Advanced Research Institute, Inc.
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
      • Columbus, Georgia, United States
        • Southeastern Medical Research Institute
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States
        • Accelovance
    • Indiana
      • South Bend, Indiana, United States
        • Accelovance
    • Massachusetts
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
        • FutureCare Studies, Inc.
      • Watertown, Massachusetts, United States
        • Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc.
    • Michigan
      • Kalmazoo, Michigan, United States
        • Beyer Research
    • Minnesota
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
        • Radiant Research
    • New Jersey
      • Edison, New Jersey, United States
        • Anderson & Collins Clinical Research Inc.
      • Englewood, New Jersey, United States
        • Urology Center Research Institute
    • New York
      • Garden City, New York, United States
        • AccuMed Research Associates
      • New York, New York, United States
        • University Urology Associates
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
        • Community Research
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
        • Complete HealthCare
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Urologic Consultants of SE PA
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Penn Urology
    • South Carolina
      • Anderson, South Carolina, United States
        • Hartwell Research Group, LLC
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
        • Medical University of South Carolina
      • Greer, South Carolina, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
      • Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States
        • Carolina Urologic Research Center
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
        • ClinSearch, LLC
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
        • Radiant Research Inc.
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Radiant Research, Inc.
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Quality Research Incorporated
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Wilford Hall Medical Center
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
        • Exemplar Research Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent prior to performance of any trial-related activity
  • Male sex 18 years of age or older
  • At least 2 voids every night in a consecutive 3-day period during the screening period based on the patient diary.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of severe daytime voiding dysfunction defined as: Urge urinary incontinence (more than 1 episode/day in the 3-day diary period), Urgency (more than 1 episode/day in the 3-day diary period), Frequency (more than 8 daytime voids/day in the 3-day diary period)
  • Interstitial Cystitis
  • Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome
  • Suspicion of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) or a urine flow of less than 5 mL/s as confirmed by uroflowmetry performed after suspicion of BOO
  • Surgical treatment, including transurethral resection, for BOO or benign prostatic hyperplasia within the past 6 months
  • Urinary retention or a post void residual volume in excess of 250 mL as confirmed by bladder ultrasound performed after suspicion of urinary retention
  • Habitual or psychogenic fluid intake resulting in a urine production exceeding 40 mL/kg/24 hours
  • Central or nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.
  • Syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone.
  • Current or a history of urologic malignancies e.g. urothelium, prostate, or kidney cancer
  • Genitourinary tract pathology e.g. infection or stone in the bladder and urethra causing symptoms
  • Neurogenic detrusor activity (detrusor overactivity)
  • Suspicion or evidence of cardiac failure
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Hyponatraemia: Serum sodium level must be within normal limits
  • Renal insufficiency: Serum creatinine must be within normal limits and estimated glomerular filtration rate must be more than or equal to 50 mL/min
  • Hepatic and/or biliary diseases: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels must not be more than twice the upper limit of normal range. Total bilirubin level must not be more than 1.5 mg/dL
  • History of obstructive sleep apnea
  • Previous desmopressin treatment for nocturia
  • Treatment with another investigational product within 3 months prior to screening
  • Concomitant treatment with any prohibited medication, i.e. loop diuretics (furosemide, torsemide, ethacrynic acid) and any other investigational drug
  • Known alcohol or substance abuse
  • Work or lifestyle that may interfere with regular nighttime sleep e.g. shift workers
  • Any other medical condition, laboratory abnormality, psychiatric condition, mental incapacity, or language barrier that, in the judgment of the investigator, would impair participation in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Desmopressin 50 μg Double-Blind / 100 μg Open-Label
Participants took 1 orally disintegrating tablet of desmopressin 50 μg every night approximately 1 hour prior to bedtime for the entire duration of the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Participants completing the double-blind period were switched to desmopressin 100 μg for the 1-month open-label extension period.
Other Names:
  • FE992026
  • Nocturin®
  • MINIRIN®
Experimental: Desmopressin 75 μg Double-Blind / 100 μg Open-Label
Participants took 1 orally disintegrating tablet of desmopressin 75 μg every night approximately 1 hour prior to bedtime for the entire duration of the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Participants completing the double-blind period were switched to desmopressin 100 μg for the 1-month open-label extension period.
Other Names:
  • FE992026
  • Nocturin®
  • MINIRIN®
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Double-Blind / Desmopressin 100 μg Open-Label
Participants took 1 orally disintegrating tablet of placebo every night approximately 1 hour prior to bedtime for the entire duration of the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Participants completing the double-blind period were switched to desmopressin 100 μg for the 1-month open-label extension period.
Other Names:
  • FE992026
  • Nocturin®
  • MINIRIN®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids Averaged Over a 3-Month Period
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3 (3-month double-blind treatment period)

The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to Day 1 and prior to the during-treatment visits (Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3) as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void. Change from baseline values for Week 1, and Months 1, 2 and 3 are reported below.

Comparison of the mean number of nocturnal voids at baseline and over a 3-month treatment period (obtained by longitudinal analysis of Week 1, and Months 1, 2 and 3) are reported in the statistical analysis. This was the first co-primary outcome. Superiority to placebo was to be simultaneously demonstrated on the 2 co-primary outcomes in a step-down approach from highest (75 μg) to lowest dose (50 μg), thereby controlling the family-wise error rate at the 5% nominal significance level.

Day 1 (Baseline), Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3 (3-month double-blind treatment period)
Adjusted Probability of Participants Achieving a >33% Reduction From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Voids for All During-Treatment Visits up to Month 3
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3 (3-month double-blind treatment period)

Probability of participants achieving 33% responder status during 3 months of treatment employed a longitudinal analysis assessing nocturnal void information captured in the 3-day diary. A 33% responder was defined as a participant with a decrease of at least 33% in the mean number of nocturnal voids relative to baseline. The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to Day 1 and prior to the during treatment visits (Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3) as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void.

This was the second co-primary outcome. Superiority to placebo was to be simultaneously demonstrated on the 2 co-primary endpoints in a step-down approach from highest (75 μg) to lowest dose (50 μg), thereby controlling the family-wise error rate at the 5% nominal significance level.

Day 1 (Baseline), Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3 (3-month double-blind treatment period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Month 3
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3

Comparison of the mean number of nocturnal voids at baseline and at the 3-month visit. The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to the relevant visits as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void.

The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed. The active treatment groups were compared to placebo using a step-down approach from highest dose (75 µg) to lowest dose (50 µg).

Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
Adjusted Probability of Participants Achieving a >33% Reduction From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Voids at Month 3
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3

Probability of participants achieving 33% responder status at Month 3 employed a longitudinal analysis assessing nocturnal void information captured in the 3-day diary. A 33% responder was defined as a participant with a decrease of at least 33% in the mean number of nocturnal voids relative to baseline. The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to Day 1 and prior to the Month 3 visit as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void.

The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed. The active treatment groups were compared to placebo using a step-down approach from highest dose (75 µg) to lowest dose (50 µg).

Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
Change From Baseline in Mean Time to First Nocturnal Void at Month 3
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3

The time to first void was defined as the time from going to bed with the intention of sleeping until first nocturnal void or until waking in the morning in the case where there was no nocturnal void. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void. The time to first void was derived from the sleep and voiding diary. The mean time to first void was calculated as the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to the Month 3 visit.

The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed. The active treatment groups were compared to placebo using a step-down approach from highest dose (75 µg) to lowest dose (50 µg).

Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Urine Volume at Month 3
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3

The nocturnal urine volume was derived from the 3-day urine volume diary. The nocturnal urine volume included the volume of the first morning void. Mean urine volumes were calculated as the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to the Month 3 visit.

The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed. The active treatment groups were compared to placebo using a step-down approach from highest dose (75 µg) to lowest dose (50 µg).

Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Urine Volume at Month 3
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3

Twenty-four hour urine volume was derived from the 3-day urine volume diary. Mean urine volumes were calculated as the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to the Month 3 visit.

The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed. The active treatment groups were compared to placebo using a step-down approach from highest dose (75 µg) to lowest dose (50 µg).

Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
Summary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From Day 1 through Month 3 (double-blind period)
A TEAE was any adverse event (AE) occurring after start of treatment and within the time of residual drug effect, i.e., within 1 day for desmopressin. An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any AE assessed by the investigator as possibly or probably related to study drug.
From Day 1 through Month 3 (double-blind period)
Summary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Open-Label Period
Time Frame: Month 1 of open-label period (Month 4 of treatment)
A TEAE was any adverse event (AE) occurring after start of treatment and within the time of residual drug effect, i.e., within 1 day for desmopressin. An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any AE assessed by the investigator as possibly or probably related to study drug.
Month 1 of open-label period (Month 4 of treatment)
Minimum Post-Treatment Serum Sodium Levels in the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: Day 1 through Month 3 (double-blind period)
Serum sodium levels were monitored at each study visit since hyponatremia is a potential serious adverse event associated with daily doses of desmopressin. The serum sodium level must have been within the normal reference range at the Screening Visit for the participant to be eligible for enrollment. A participant was to be withdrawn from the trial if the serum sodium level was <=125 mmol/L at any time.
Day 1 through Month 3 (double-blind period)
Minimum Post-Treatment Serum Sodium Levels in the Open-Label Period
Time Frame: Month 1 of open-label period (Month 4 of treatment)
Serum sodium levels were monitored at each study visit since hyponatremia is a potential serious adverse event associated with daily doses of desmopressin. The serum sodium level must have been within the normal reference range at the Screening Visit for the participant to be eligible for enrollment. A participant was to be withdrawn from the trial if the serum sodium level was <=125 mmol/L at any time.
Month 1 of open-label period (Month 4 of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nocturia

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe