PLATINUM Program: A Feasibility Study on a Train-the-trainer Course on Peer Support for People With Type 2 Diabetes (PLATINUM)

July 21, 2014 updated by: Asia Diabetes Foundation

Peer Leaders Accelerated Training Initiative to Unleash Potential of Mentorship (PLATINUM) Program: A Feasibility Study on a Train-the-trainer Course on Peer Support for People With Type 2 Diabetes

The investigators hypothesize that a training course to people with diabetes on peer support and empowerment will improve their glycemic parameters, knowledge on diabetes and level of self efficacy. This group of trained patients (peer leaders) should be competent to teach and help other patients with diabetes through peer support and empowerment on better self management of their diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In our attempt to improve diabetes self care, one important component is the diabetes patients who should have the best incentive to improve their care levels and reduce their complication risk, provided that they are appropriately trained, informed, educated and supported. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions framework, expert patients are recommended to be included in the health care team to make them prepared, motivated and informed decision makers to preserve health and improve clinical outcomes. In a recent report on WHO consultation, peer support interventions are considered to have enormous potentials to make self management an effective component of chronic care.

Peer support is defined as support from a person who has experiential knowledge of a specific behavior or stressor and similar characteristics as the target population. Thus people with common illness experience can share knowledge and experience in a less hierarchical and reciprocal relationship compared to that between patients and health care professionals. A number of programs including health worker-led groups with peer exchange, peer-led face-to-face self management programs, peer coaches and remote peer support have reported encouraging results with short term improvement in metabolic or cognitive-psychological-behavioral dimensions, although these results are often limited by non-sustainability of changes and insufficient reach or adoption of programs by patients or health care workers. In the WHO report, health care experts from various disciplines concluded that whilst peer support is a promising approach for diabetes management, issues regarding methods of organization, types of programs and their integration with other clinical and outreach services remain to be addressed. Of note, there is a paucity of similar data in developing and low income areas which are hit hardest by this epidemic and where peer support program may offer great promise to make diabetes prevention and care program more sustainable and accessible, if implemented and evaluated systematically.

Health professionals, especially diabetes nursing specialists, have been training diabetes patients on the understanding and self-caring of diabetes. However, with the emerging concept and preliminary evidence of success in the role of "peer advisors" in diabetes to lead self care courses for other fellow patients, a train-the-trainer program to develop "expert patients" is essential. On top of factual knowledge on diabetes as a disease, context of this program needs to cover include communication and empowerment skill, basic knowledge on psychology, stress management, social support, empowerment, healthy lifestyle including diet and physical activity.

In the evaluation of the programs, there is a need to define the qualities and roles of the peer supporter, design programs which integrate and complement formal health services, identify optimal mix of modalities of intervention, types and dose response of these interventions and evaluate acceptability and effectiveness of these programs in different cultures. Other evaluation indexes include effects of programs on behavioral changes, knowledge and attitudes, functionality, clinical care as well as their cost effectiveness, reach, implementation-consistency, adoption and maintenance of effects over time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Centre, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital
      • Central, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Hong Kong
      • Chai Wan, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Ambulatory Centre, PYNEH
      • Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Centre, Kwong Wah Hospital
      • Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
      • Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • PMH, Diabetes Care Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital
      • Lam Tin, Hong Kong
        • Lam Tin Health Clinic
      • Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Centre, Queen Mary Hospital
      • Sai Wan Ho, Hong Kong
        • Sai Wan Ho Health Centre
      • Wan Chai, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Centre, Ruttonjee Hospital
    • Kowloon
      • Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Ambulatory Care Centre, UCH
    • New Territories
      • Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Kwai Chung out-patient clinic
      • Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • CUHK YCK, Prince of Wales Hospital
      • Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes & Endocrine Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital
      • Sheung Shui, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Diabetes Centre, North District Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese people with type 2 diabetes
  • 18-75 years of age
  • Good glycaemic control (HbA1c <7%) and remain stable in past 1 year
  • Willing to complete the structured training curriculum to prepare themselves as peer leaders
  • Fluent in Cantonese

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known psychiatric disease
  • Physically handicapped to the degree that communication with others is significantly impaired impaired, such as deafness, paraplegia.
  • Illiterate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
A total of 90 patients with diabetes will be recruited. Thirty will be selected for the training course and the other 60 will be compared as controls. These controls will receive their usual diabetes care.
Experimental: Peer leader training

Peer leaders are people with diabetes who had volunteered to undertake an extensive program of training. The purpose of this training is to make them effective in the provision of support and advice to their peers on a one-to-one basis via telecommunication.

These diabetes patients will undergo a 32-hour 'Train the trainer' program (4 workshops, 8-hours each) led by health care experts in nutrition, physical activity, psychology and neuro-linguistic program [NLP] trainer to ensure the adequacy of knowledge and skills of these mentors.

These diabetes patients will undergo a 32-hour 'Train the trainer' program (4 workshops, 8-hours each) led by health care experts in nutrition, physical activity, psychology and neuro-linguistic program [NLP] trainer to ensure the adequacy of knowledge and skills of these mentors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the effectiveness of the training program in improving glycemic parameters in diabetic patients before and after the training.
Time Frame: 6 months
Metabolic parameters, such as HbA1c, Body Mass Index (BMI), Lipid Profile, etc. will be measured at specific time points before and after the training
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the efficacy of the training on the attitudes, behaviours and self-efficacy of the participants as compared to the control patients
Time Frame: 6 months
The psychosocial-behavior assessment will include using the Summary of Diabetes Self- Care Activities (SDSCA), Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS21), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12), Euro Quality of Life (EQ5D) & Patient Health Questionniare (PHQ9).
6 months
To assess the efficacy of the training in improving the participants' knowledge of diabetes, as compared to the control patients.
Time Frame: 6 months
An evaluation feedback form will be completed by all participants after each workshop
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Wong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, HK
  • Principal Investigator: Shimen Au, Ruttonjee & Tang Shiu Kin Hospitals, Wan Chai, HK

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRE-2009-087

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Training program

Subscribe