Identifying Good and Poor Surgical Behaviour in the Danish Operating Room

April 12, 2011 updated by: Herlev Hospital

Aim: To identify examples of surgeons good and poor intraoperative behaviours related to safe and efficient surgery.

Methods: Ten observations will undertaken in the operating theatres of Rigshospitalet and Herlev Hospital with the researchers taking field notes. This provides the Ph.d student with empirical background knowledge of observed surgical behaviour as well as an understanding of surgical culture. The knowledge will be used to qualify the interviewguide.

8 semi-structured group interviews and 3 individual interviews will be conducted and tape recorded. The interviews will be led by the Ph.d student with an anesthesia nurse present as a co-moderator. The groups will contain 4 - 12 participants.

The interview guide will be developed with a Scottish behavioural marker system as a framework, drawing upon the literature as well as the observations. It will contain questions regarding leadership, communication, teamwork, situation awareness and decision making to facilitate a discussion about surgeons' good and poor behaviours.

Material: Data will be collected in two hospitals in the capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet and Herlev Hospital. Each hospital will provide four focus groups, one containing consultant surgeons in general surgery, one trainee surgeons, one scrub nurses and one containing a mixture of anesthetists and anesthesia nurses. The two latter focus groups is included to get the perspectives of the surgeons' team members since international studies have demonstrated differences of opinion regarding the perceived quality of teamwork amongst operating theatre staff. This study will be the first to build in the opinions of the team members into a behavioural marker system. 3 individual interviews with surgeons will afterwards conducted in one of the hospitals to get a more in-depth discussion.

Data analysis and statistics: The interviews will be fully transcribed and analysed using qualitative method of systematic text condensation. Power calculations are not relevant in this qualitative study. Accepted guidelines state that the number of participants in each group should range between 5 and 15 and the data are from two large university hospitals receiving different patient categories to ensure a certain representative sample of informants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Herlev, Denmark, 2730
        • Danish Institute for Medical Simulation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The interview informants are health care personell in two Danish Hospitals as described in the project description

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • medical professionals at Rigshospitalet and Herlev Hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Herlev Hospital

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Doris Ostergaard, M.D, Danish Institute for Medical Simulation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 13, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 13, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NTS-1-LS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Behaviour in the Operating Room

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Bulgaria

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe