- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01361035
Using Effective Provider-Patient Communication to Improve Cancer Screening Among Low Literacy Patients
What's the purpose of this study? This 4-year study is designed: (1) to teach primary care physicians how to recognize low health literacy patients and effectively counsel them on cancer screening using risk communication and shared decision making and (2) to assess the impact of training on changes in physician communication behavior and changes in low health literacy patients' cancer screening behaviors. This study proposal is based on the hypothesis that physician training in cancer screening guidelines, health literacy, and communication skills will improve provider-patient interactions during encounters dealing with preventive health maintenance especially cancer screening.
How will the proposed study be implemented? Thirty-two physicians in the New Orleans metropolitan area will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The unit of randomization will be the health care organization or clinic. The intervention group will receive training in health literacy, cancer screening, risk communication and shared decision-making. The control group will not receive communication training until the end of the study. Physicians in both groups will undergo three clinic visits with standardized patients (actors trained to portray real patients; mystery shoppers) but they will not be aware that they are conducting visits with actors. The visits will occur at study enrollment and at 6 and 12 months. At the end of each clinic visit, the standardized patients will rate the physicians' communication skills. Each physician assigned to the intervention group will receive verbal feedback on communication skills from the standardized patients and complete a web-based tutorial. Physicians in the control group will not have access to the web-based tutorial until the end of the study.
For each physician, 10-15 patients with limited health literacy will be recruited to the study. Each patient will rate his/her perceived involvement with care and global satisfaction with care at study enrollment and annually for three years. Age and gender-appropriate referral rates for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening and patients' receipt of such screening will be assessed annually for three years. All study physicians, regardless of group assignment, will receive performance feedback (report cards) on their cancer screening rates among low health literacy patients in their clinic.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
- Tulane Communty Health Center at Covenant House
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
- Tulane Faculty Practice
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70114
- EXCELth - Ida Hymel Community Health Center
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70117
- DCSNO St Cecelia Medical Center
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70118
- DCSNO Carrollton Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Physician
- Physicians who practice at these clinic sites at least one half day per week are eligible to participate in this study.
Patient
- Eligible patients include men and women age 40 to 75, individuals enrolled in the clinic practice for at least one year, and individuals identified as having low or inadequate health literacy via the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine.
Exclusion Criteria:
Physician
- Any provider planning to leave before the end of 12 months will be excluded.
Patient
- Patients will be excluded if they plan to change primary care provider or site of health plan, have resided in the United States for less than five years, or do not speak English
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: No communication training
Physicians enrolled in the control arm do not undergo training in health literacy, cancer screening and shared decision making
|
|
|
Other: Cancer risk ommunication skills training
Physicians enrolled in the intervention arm undergo training in health literacy, cancer screening and shared decision making
|
Intervention physicians receive training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making (SDM).
At the end of each visit with intervention physicians, standardized patients (SPs) reveal themselves as actors and give structured verbal feedback.
After baseline SP visits, each intervention physician undergoes academic detailing with a communication expert.
Intervention physicians are directed to a web-based communication skills tutorial where SP ratings are hyperlinked to key references for supplemental reading.
Both study groups will receive annual reports detailing their patients' cancer screening status and aggregate ratings of their communication style.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening rates
Time Frame: 0, 12, 24 months
|
Cervical/Breast/Colorectal cancer screening rates will be measured at baseline and annually for 2 years to assess whether screening rates improve over time
|
0, 12, 24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in standardized patient ratings of physician communication behaviors
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12 months
|
The mystery shoppers (standardized patients) will rate the physicians' shared decision making and counseling about cancer screening prior to the intervention at baseline and then again at 6-month and 12-month follow up evaluations to assess whether communication behaviors improve over time
|
0, 6, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eboni Price-Haywood, MD, MPH, Tulane University School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Price-Haywood EG, Roth KG, Shelby K, Cooper LA. Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 May;25 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S126-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1211-6.
- Price-Haywood EG, Harden-Barrios J, Cooper LA. Comparative effectiveness of audit-feedback versus additional physician communication training to improve cancer screening for patients with limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1113-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2782-4. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Uterine Neoplasms
- Genital Neoplasms, Female
- Uterine Cervical Diseases
- Uterine Diseases
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Colonic Diseases
- Intestinal Diseases
- Intestinal Neoplasms
- Rectal Diseases
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Colorectal Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RWJF-63523
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.