Using Effective Provider-Patient Communication to Improve Cancer Screening Among Low Literacy Patients

March 9, 2017 updated by: Eboni Price-Haywood, Tulane University School of Medicine

What's the purpose of this study? This 4-year study is designed: (1) to teach primary care physicians how to recognize low health literacy patients and effectively counsel them on cancer screening using risk communication and shared decision making and (2) to assess the impact of training on changes in physician communication behavior and changes in low health literacy patients' cancer screening behaviors. This study proposal is based on the hypothesis that physician training in cancer screening guidelines, health literacy, and communication skills will improve provider-patient interactions during encounters dealing with preventive health maintenance especially cancer screening.

How will the proposed study be implemented? Thirty-two physicians in the New Orleans metropolitan area will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The unit of randomization will be the health care organization or clinic. The intervention group will receive training in health literacy, cancer screening, risk communication and shared decision-making. The control group will not receive communication training until the end of the study. Physicians in both groups will undergo three clinic visits with standardized patients (actors trained to portray real patients; mystery shoppers) but they will not be aware that they are conducting visits with actors. The visits will occur at study enrollment and at 6 and 12 months. At the end of each clinic visit, the standardized patients will rate the physicians' communication skills. Each physician assigned to the intervention group will receive verbal feedback on communication skills from the standardized patients and complete a web-based tutorial. Physicians in the control group will not have access to the web-based tutorial until the end of the study.

For each physician, 10-15 patients with limited health literacy will be recruited to the study. Each patient will rate his/her perceived involvement with care and global satisfaction with care at study enrollment and annually for three years. Age and gender-appropriate referral rates for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening and patients' receipt of such screening will be assessed annually for three years. All study physicians, regardless of group assignment, will receive performance feedback (report cards) on their cancer screening rates among low health literacy patients in their clinic.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

168

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Tulane Communty Health Center at Covenant House
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Tulane Faculty Practice
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70114
        • EXCELth - Ida Hymel Community Health Center
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70117
        • DCSNO St Cecelia Medical Center
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70118
        • DCSNO Carrollton Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Physician

  • Physicians who practice at these clinic sites at least one half day per week are eligible to participate in this study.

Patient

  • Eligible patients include men and women age 40 to 75, individuals enrolled in the clinic practice for at least one year, and individuals identified as having low or inadequate health literacy via the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine.

Exclusion Criteria:

Physician

  • Any provider planning to leave before the end of 12 months will be excluded.

Patient

  • Patients will be excluded if they plan to change primary care provider or site of health plan, have resided in the United States for less than five years, or do not speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No communication training
Physicians enrolled in the control arm do not undergo training in health literacy, cancer screening and shared decision making
Other: Cancer risk ommunication skills training
Physicians enrolled in the intervention arm undergo training in health literacy, cancer screening and shared decision making
Intervention physicians receive training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making (SDM). At the end of each visit with intervention physicians, standardized patients (SPs) reveal themselves as actors and give structured verbal feedback. After baseline SP visits, each intervention physician undergoes academic detailing with a communication expert. Intervention physicians are directed to a web-based communication skills tutorial where SP ratings are hyperlinked to key references for supplemental reading. Both study groups will receive annual reports detailing their patients' cancer screening status and aggregate ratings of their communication style.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening rates
Time Frame: 0, 12, 24 months
Cervical/Breast/Colorectal cancer screening rates will be measured at baseline and annually for 2 years to assess whether screening rates improve over time
0, 12, 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in standardized patient ratings of physician communication behaviors
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12 months
The mystery shoppers (standardized patients) will rate the physicians' shared decision making and counseling about cancer screening prior to the intervention at baseline and then again at 6-month and 12-month follow up evaluations to assess whether communication behaviors improve over time
0, 6, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eboni Price-Haywood, MD, MPH, Tulane University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on Cancer risk communication skills training

Subscribe