Improving Discharge Communication in the Emergency Department Through Information Structuring

October 22, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Improving Discharge Communication in the Emergency Department Through Information Structuring: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of the proposed study is to assess the potential of information structuring for improving discharge communication. Specifically, the investigators aim to examine the advantages of an information-structuring skills training for physicians (compared to an empathy skills training) on discharge communication and associated patient outcomes, such as patients' information recall and adherence to physician recommendations. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving structured discharge information from their trained physicians will be able to recall more information and show higher adherence to recommendations relative to controls (i.e., patients receiving discharge information from doctors trained in empathy skills).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baselstadt
      • Basel, Baselstadt, Switzerland, 4031
        • University Hospital Basel, Emergency Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatients with chest pain
  • Outpatients with abdominal pain

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 years of age (limited ability to provide informed consent)
  • Patients with limited ability to communicate in German, the default language at the hospital (confounder related to language proficiency)
  • Patients with dementia (confounder arising from pathological memory deficits)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Information structuring skills training
Physicians received a communication skills training focusing on information structuring with the so-called book metaphor for a structured discharge communication with the patient.
Active Comparator: Empathy skills training
Physicians received a communication skills training focusing on empathy skills with the acronym NURSE for an empathetic discharge communication with the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patients' recall of the information provided during discharge communication
Time Frame: 3 times: immediately after discharge, one week after discharge, one month after discharge
3 times: immediately after discharge, one week after discharge, one month after discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to recommendations
Time Frame: 2 times: one week and one month after discharge
2 times: one week and one month after discharge
Patient satisfaction in four dimensions
Time Frame: Immediately after discharge
(1) comprehension, (2) structuredness (3) recommendation of the physician to family and friends (4) informativeness
Immediately after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roland Bingisser, Prof. Dr., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Information Structuring Skills

Clinical Trials on Communication skills training "information structuring skills"

3
Subscribe