- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01459471
Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial
October 21, 2011 updated by: Paolo Gentileschi, University of Rome Tor Vergata
The main drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the severity of post-operative complications.
Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is strongly advocated.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of this study was to prospectively and randomly compare three different techniques of SLR during LSG: oversewing (group A), buttressed transection with a polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate (group B) and staple-line roofing with a gelatin fibrin matrix (group C).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
120
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
28 years to 59 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Morbidly obese patients waiting for sleeve gastrectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- BMI<35 Kg/m2,
- Important comorbidities
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: bleeding, leak, operative time
|
Staple line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
safety of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by measuring the number of adverse effects, i.e. bleeding and leaks.
Time Frame: six months
|
a comparison between three techniques of staple line reinforcement.
The number of adverse events will be registered and analyzed
|
six months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Paolo Gentileschi, MD, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 21, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
October 25, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 25, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 21, 2011
Last Verified
October 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- SEND-11-0905
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Complication of Surgical Procedure
-
Mateusz Jan StępińskiCompleted
-
Hannover Medical SchoolKarolinska Institutet; Helsinki University Central Hospital; University of Leipzig and other collaboratorsRecruitingComplication of Surgical ProcedureGermany
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruitingComplication of Surgical ProcedureUnited States
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...UnknownComplication of Surgical ProcedureSpain
-
Zeyong YangUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedComplication of Surgical Procedure
-
Hannover Medical SchoolRecruitingComplication of Surgical ProcedureGermany
-
Hospital General Universitario ElcheDr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedCardiovascular Risk Factors of Medical and Septic Complications After Laparoscopic Bariatric SurgeryComplication of Surgical Procedure
-
Eske Kvanner AasvangCompletedComplication of Surgical Procedure | Respiratory Complication | Complication of Anesthesia | Circulatory; ComplicationsDenmark
-
KU LeuvenCompletedComplication of Surgical Procedure | Operation TimeBelgium
-
Richard PeruginiUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterTerminatedComplication of Surgical Procedure | Resident PhysiciansUnited States
Clinical Trials on Bariatric surgery
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceTerminatedObesity | Chronic Kidney DiseaseFrance
-
Imperial College LondonRecruitingObesity | Type 2 DiabetesIreland
-
McMaster UniversityNot yet recruitingRobotic Surgery | Bariatric Surgery
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruiting
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRecruitingLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Bariatric Surgery CandidateHong Kong
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Bariatric Surgery Candidate | MoralitySweden
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRecruitingObesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS)United Kingdom
-
Queen Fabiola Children's University HospitalNot yet recruitingMorbid Obesity | Adolescent Obesity | Bariatric SurgeryBelgium
-
Rabin Medical CenterRecruiting