An Observational Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) as Second-line Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of Pemetrexed in First-line Therapy (TIME)

November 23, 2015 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter, National, Non-interventional Phase IV Trial of the Effectiveness, Safety and Tolerability of Tarceva as Second-line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), After Failure of First-line Treatment With a Pemetrexed-containing Chemotherapy Regimen

This prospective, multicenter observational study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Tarceva (erlotinib) as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed after pemetrexed-containing first-line chemotherapy. Eligible patients will be followed until withdrawal of consent, lost-to-follow-up, or study termination, whichever occurs first.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalst, Belgium, 9300
      • Antwerpen, Belgium, 2020
      • Boussu, Belgium, 7360
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
      • Charleroi, Belgium, 6000
      • Dendermonde, Belgium, 9200
      • Duffel, Belgium, 2570
      • Edegem, Belgium, 2650
      • Frameries, Belgium, 7080
      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
      • Gilly, Belgium, 6060
      • Gosselies, Belgium, 6041
      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
      • Mons, Belgium, 7000
      • Montegnée, Belgium, 4420
      • Namur, Belgium, 5000
      • Ottignies, Belgium, 1340
      • Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
      • Sint Niklaas, Belgium, 9100
      • Tournai, Belgium, 7500
      • Turnhout, Belgium, 2300

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer initiated on second-line Tarceva therapy after first-line pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Histologically or cytologically documented locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (inoperable Stage III or IV according to the 7th TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors).
  • Experiencing disease progression after pemetrexed-containing first-line chemotherapy regimen.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2.
  • Initiated on second-line treatment with Tarceva at the most 4 weeks prior to study entry at baseline (date of signature of informed consent).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior chemotherapy/targeted therapy after disease progression after first-line treatment in the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) setting.
  • Contraindication for Tarceva according to the Summary of Product characteristics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Erlotinib
Selection of the dose of erlotinib most suitable for each participant was left to the discretion of the physician, guided by the recommendation in the Summary of Product Characteristics. The recommended daily oral dose of erlotinib is 150 mg.
Erlotinib was supplied as tablets in the retail product Tarceva.
Other Names:
  • Tarceva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 2 years)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the first dose of erlotinib to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter of target lesions recorded since treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Baseline to the end of the study (up to 2 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best Overall Response
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 2 years)
Reported are the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). The best overall response to treatment was determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL) or the disappearance of all non-TLs. A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started for TLs and the persistence of 1 or more non-TL(s). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Baseline to the end of the study (up to 2 years)
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Overall survival was defined as the time from Baseline until death from any cause.
Up to 2 years
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Rash
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Up to 2 years
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Diarrhea
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Erlotinib

Subscribe