- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01749995
Validation of the Freund Clock Drawing Test to Screen for Cognitive Dysfunction in Cancer Patients (PROACTIVE)
Prospective Validation of the Use of the Freund Clock Drawing Test (CDT) to Screen for Cognitive Dysfunction in Cancer Patients Undergoing Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)
A Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has become a fundamental aid in the evaluation and treatment planning of older cancer patients. Systematic reviews of trials of geriatric assessments have shown effectiveness when interventions are implemented. Although CGA is a fundamental tool in the care of the geriatric patient, the integration and application of this tool in oncologic practice are still in evolution. Cognition is one of the domains examined within a CGA. Studies have noted that up to 25% to 50% of older patients had cognitive abnormalities that warranted further evaluation. Cognitive dysfunctions can influence the ability to weigh the risks and benefits of cancer therapy, to comply with the suggested treatment plan, and to recognize the symptoms of toxicity that need medical attention. Recently, the Freund Clock Drawing Test (CDT) has been proposed as a quick and simple screening tool to assess cognitive dysfunction. A retrospective analysis on 105 cancer patients at the General Hospital Groeninge showed that a cut-off score of ≤ 4 for the CDT has a good AUC, sensitivity and specificity.
Aims
- To validate the Clock Drawing Test as a screening tool to identify elderly cancer patients in need of a more in-depth cognitive evaluation within a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)
- Further registration of data in a database coupled to the Cancer Registry in the General Hospital Groeninge as set up by the PROGERCAN study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Design: A prospective, observational, cohort study. All geriatric patients who are diagnosed with cancer will be screened by an oncology clinical nurse specialist or study collaborator with the G8 questionnaire. Patients who screen positive, will be refered to the multi-disciplinary onco-geriatric program where a member of the geriatric oncology team will implement a comprehensive geriatric evaluation under supervision of an oncologist and/or geriatrician, who will then formulate recommendations and might suggest referral to other health care providers.
Population: All consenting patients, aged ≥ 70, who are referred for anti-cancer treatment in the General Hospital Groeninge and who are in need of a CGA.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kortrijk, Belgium, 8500
- General Hospital Groeninge, Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients should have reached the age of 70 or more at the moment of enrolment
- Patients should be eligible for standard CGA as per local practice (e.g. on the basis of positive screening with G8 or referred by a treating physician on the basis of clinical suspicion of vulnerability or frailty)
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer. All stages of cancer are eligible.
- Patients should be fluent in Dutch or French
- Patients must receive their primary oncology care (surgery, course of (neo)adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, palliative care, experimental treatment as part of a clinical trial,...) planned in the General Hospital Groeninge
- Patients can be included before or at the start of a line of treatment but not during a line of treatment
- Patients should have signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not match the inclusion criteria
- Patients who are visiting the oncology clinic for a second opinion and do not wish to be treated in the General Hospital Groeninge
- Patients who already started a respective line of treatment
- Patients deemed fit on the basis of negative screening (negative result on G8) unless the treating physician suspects vulnerability or frailty based on clinical judgement
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Validation of the Freund Clock Drawing Test, and Its Predefined Cut-off of ≤ 4, as a Screening Tool to Identify Elderly Cancer Patients in Need of a More In-depth Cognitive Evaluation With the Folstein MMSE Within Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied in order to validate the Freund Clock Drawing Test at its predefined cut-off of ≤ 4.
This ROC analysis illustrates the capacity of the Freund Clock Drawing Test to identify elderly cancer patients in need of a more in-depth cognitive evaluation with the Folstein MMSE within comprehensive geriatric assessment.
The ROC curve is a fundamental tool for diagnostic test evaluation.
In a ROC curve the true positive rate (Sensitivity) is plotted in function of the false positive rate (100-Specificity) for different cut-off points of a parameter.
The AUC (Area Under Curve) is the area enclosed by the ROC curve.
The range of possible AUC values is [0, 1].
A perfect classifier has AUC = 1 and a completely random classifier has AUC = 0.5.
Usually, themodel will score somewhere in between.
|
Baseline
|
|
Further Registration of Data in a Database Coupled to the Cancer Registry in the General Hospital Groeninge as Set up by the PROGERCAN Study
Time Frame: Baseline
|
During the PROGERCAN study, a database was set up in which the results of the CGA were coupled to the data available in the Cancer Registry of the General Hospital Groeninge.
In this project, we aim continue this registration.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of the Mini-Cog (Cognitive Screening Tool Consisting of a Clock Drawing With 3-word Recall Test) When Using the Freund CDT
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
To Determine the Time-saving
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Determination of the time-saving when using the Freund Clock Drawing Test instead of the Folstein MMSE
|
Baseline
|
|
To Compare the Freund Scoring System With Other Scoring Systems (Such as Watson and Colleagues), When Using a Predrawn Circle
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
To Develop a Tumour Tissue Database (Bio Bank) of Elderly Cancer Patients, Solely for Scientific Purposes
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philip R Debruyne, MD, PhD, MSc, FRCP, AZ Groeninge
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ketelaars L, Pottel L, Lycke M, Goethals L, Ghekiere V, Santy L, Boterberg T, Van Den Noortgate N, Pottel H, Debruyne PR. Use of the Freund clock drawing test within the Mini-Cog as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in elderly patients with or without cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2013 Apr;4(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.10.175. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
- Lycke M, Ketelaars L, Boterberg T, Pottel L, Pottel H, Vergauwe P, Goethals L, Van Eygen K, Werbrouck P, Debruyne D, Derijcke S, Borms M, Ghekiere V, Wildiers H, Debruyne PR. Validation of the Freund Clock Drawing Test as a screening tool to detect cognitive dysfunction in elderly cancer patients undergoing comprehensive geriatric assessment. Psychooncology. 2014 Oct;23(10):1172-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3540. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AZGS2012061
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Subjective Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianNot yet recruitingCognitive Impairment | Anesthesia | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Anesthesia Brain Monitoring | Cognitive Impairment, Progressive | Anesthesia Depth MonitoringUnited Kingdom
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusUniversity of Florence; Consorzio di Bioingeneria e Informatica Medica; Gutenberg...CompletedCognitive Dysfunction | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Vascular Cognitive ImpairmentItaly
-
University of California, Los AngelesCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | Age-associated Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
Universidad de ZaragozaRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Randomized Controlled Trial | Subjective Cognitive ImpairmentSpain
-
BaycrestCentre for Aging and Brain Health InnovationUnknownNeurocognitive Disorders | Cognitive Dysfunction | Mental Disorder | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Cognitive Disorder | Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
Region SkaneLund University; Berry LabCompletedMemory Impairment | Cognitive Impairment, MildSweden
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Vascular Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
University of HawaiiRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Subjective Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
University of GeorgiaApplied Universal Dynamics, Corp.; Van Robotics, Inc.Active, not recruitingRobot-assisted Cognitive Training for Lonely Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) (MCI)Cognitive Change | Aging | Cognitive Impairment, MildUnited States