ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

September 17, 2020 updated by: InSightec

A Feasibility Study to Evaluate Safety and Initial Effectiveness of ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for Unilateral Thalamotomy in the Treatment of Medication-Refractory Tremor Dominant Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease.

This is a feasibility study to evaluate the safety and initial effectiveness of unilateral ExAblate thermal ablation of the Vim thalamic nucleus of subjects suffering from medication-refractory, idiopathic, tremor-dominant PD, using the ExAblate Transcranial system compared to a Sham Vim thalamotomy procedure.

Data will be collected to establish the basic safety of this type of treatment as the basis for later studies that will evaluate its full clinical efficacy. The Sham treatment data will be used to evaluate placebo effect from treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects who sign informed consent and pass all eligibility criteria will be randomized to a treatment assignment. During treatment, the assigned treatment (ExAblate Transcranial or Sham ExAblate Transcranial)will be delivered. Subjects are followed in a blinded fashion for three (3) months. After the 3-month assessment, subjects will be unblinded and told their treatment assignment. Subjects receiving Sham ExAblate Transcranial treatment who still meet criteria will be crossed over and receive an active ExAblate Transcranial treatment. Subjects will be followed for up to two (2) years. Follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months and up to two (2) years includes Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scoring, mental and cognitive functional testing and questionnaires.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
        • Swedish Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women, age 30 years and older
  • Subjects who are able and willing to give informed consent and able to attend all study visits
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of idiopathic PD as confirmed from clinical history and examination by a movement disorder neurologist at the site
  • Subject demonstrates a severe resting tremor or postural/action as measured by UPDRS
  • Subject exhibits a significant disability from their PD tremor despite medical treatment
  • Subjects should be on a stable dose of all PD medications for 30 days prior to study entry
  • Subject is able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate Transcranial procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with unstable cardiac status
  • Subjects exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse
  • Severe hypertension
  • Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  • Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent including advanced kidney disease or severely impaired renal function
  • Significant claustrophobia that cannot be managed with mild medication
  • Current medical condition resulting in abnormal bleeding and/or coagulopathy
  • Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage
  • History of intracranial hemorrhage
  • History of multiple strokes, or a stroke within past 6 months
  • Subjects who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment
  • Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  • Subjects unable to communicate with the investigator and staff
  • Subjects with a history of seizures within the past year
  • Subjects with brain tumors
  • Subjects with intracranial aneurysms requiring treatment or arterial venous malformations (AVMs) requiring treatment
  • Subjects who have had deep brain stimulation or a prior stereotactic ablation of the basal ganglia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS
ExAblate Transcranial MR guided Focused Ultrasound
ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound
Other Names:
  • ExAblate
  • Focused Ultrasound
  • MRgFUS
  • Transcranial MRgFUS Thalamotomy
Sham Comparator: Sham ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS
Sham treatment with ExAblate MR guided Focused Ultrasound
Sham ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Month 3

Evaluate of adverse events (AEs) associated with the ExAblate Transcranial thalamotomy of medication-refractory, tremor-dominant PD during the ExAblate treatment.

Primary safety analyses are reported in the adverse events module.

Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tremor Motor Score Percent Change From Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
The percent change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum that was used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months were used to calculate percent change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High percent change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Baseline, Month 3
Tremor Motor Scores - Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor - Treated Side Upper Extremity Parts A & B.
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12
Upper extremity Tremor-Motor score for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum that measures treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points for each side with lower scores being a better outcome. Subject's Tremor-Motor scores for the test and sham control groups were averaged at each study visit.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 12
Functional Disabilities - Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor Part C - Functional Disabilities
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12
The Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part C is a measure of functional disability due to tremor. The Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor Part C consists of 8 items each scored from 0 to 4. Thus, the total score summed ranges from 0 to 32 and provides an overall assessment of activities of daily living. Low scores on the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part C are better. Low scores show improvement in functional disabilities compared to higher scores.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeff Elias, M.D., University of Virginia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

3
Subscribe