ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS of the Subthalamic Nucleus for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

April 15, 2026 updated by: InSightec

A Randomized Feasibility Clinical Trial of the Management of the Medically-Refractory Motor Symptoms of Advanced Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease With Unilateral Lesioning of the Subthalamic Nucleus Using the ExAblate Transcranial System

This is primarily a safety protocol to evaluate the safety of subthalamotomy using Transcranial ExAblate for treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD) motor features.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind (to subjects and examiners), two-arm (ExAblate treated arm vs ExAblate Sham treated control arm) feasibility study. All treated subjects will be followed for 12 months.

Data will be collected to establish the basic safety and clinical efficacy of this type of treatment as the basis for later studies that will evaluate the full clinical efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women, age 30 years and older
  2. Subjects who are able and willing to give informed consent and able to attend all study visits
  3. Subjects with a diagnosis of idiopathic PD by UK Brain Bank Criteria as confirmed by a movement disorder neurologist at the site
  4. Levodopa responsive as defined by at least a 30% reduction in MDS-UPDRS motor sub-scale in the ON vs OFF medication state
  5. Disabling motor clinical features not optimally controlled by an adequate medication prescription. An adequate medication prescription is defined as a therapeutic dose of each medication or the development of side effects as the medication dose is titrated
  6. Predominant disability from one side of the body (i.e unilateral or markedly asymmetric disease) as determined by movement disorders neurologist and neurosurgeon
  7. Subjects should be on a stable dose of all PD medications for 30 days prior to study entry
  8. Subthalamic nucleus is visible on MRI so that it can be targeted by the ExAblate device
  9. Subjects should have a Screening motor assessment of ≥ 35 while OFF medications on the MDS-UPDRS
  10. Subject is able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate Transcranial procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hoehn and Yahr stage in the ON medication state of 2.5 or greater
  2. Presence of severe dyskinesia as noted by a score of 3 or 4 on questions 4.1 and 4.2 of the MDS-UPDRS
  3. Presence of other central neurodegenerative disease suspected on neurological examination. These include: multisystem atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Alzheimer's disease
  4. Any suspicion that Parkinsonian symptoms are a side effect from neuroleptic medications
  5. Subjects who have had deep brain stimulation or a prior stereotactic ablation of the basal ganglia
  6. Presence of significant cognitive impairment defined as score ≤ 21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or Mattis Dementia Rating Scale of 120 or lower
  7. Unstable psychiatric disease, defined as active uncontrolled depressive symptoms, psychosis, delusions, hallucinations, or suicidal ideation. Subjects with stable, chronic anxiety or depressive disorders may be included provided their medications have been stable for at least 60 days prior to study entry and if deemed appropriately managed by the site neuropsychologist
  8. Subjects with significant depression as determined following a comprehensive assessment by a neuropsychologist. Significant depression is being defined quantitatively as a score of greater than 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory
  9. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity as determined by the neuropsychologist
  10. Subjects exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse as defined by the criteria outlined in the DSM-IV as manifested by one (or more) of the following occurring within the preceding 12 month period:

    1. Recurrent substance use resulting in a failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home (such as repeated absences or poor work performance related to substance use; substance-related absences, suspensions, or expulsions from school; or neglect of children or household)
    2. Recurrent substance use in situations in which it is physically hazardous (such as driving an automobile or operating a machine when impaired by substance use)
    3. Recurrent substance-related legal problems (such as arrests for substance related disorderly conduct)
    4. Continued substance use despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of the substance (for example, arguments with spouse about consequences of intoxication and physical fights)
  11. Subjects with unstable cardiac status including:

    1. Unstable angina pectoris on medication
    2. Subjects with documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry
    3. Significant congestive heart failure defined with ejection fraction < 40
    4. Subjects with unstable ventricular arrhythmias
    5. Subjects with atrial arrhythmias that are not rate-controlled
  12. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
  13. History of or current medical condition resulting in abnormal bleeding and/or coagulopathy
  14. Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage (e.g. Avastin) within one month of focused ultrasound procedure
  15. Subjects with risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding as indicated by: platelet count less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter, a documented clinical coagulopathy, or INR coagulation studies exceeding the institution's laboratory standard
  16. Patient with severely impaired renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (or per local standards should that be more restrictive) and/or who is on dialysis
  17. Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  18. Significant claustrophobia that cannot be managed with mild medication
  19. Subjects who weigh more than the upper weight limit of the MR table and who cannot fit into the MR scanner
  20. Subjects who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment
  21. History of intracranial hemorrhage
  22. History of multiple strokes, or a stroke within past 6 months
  23. Subjects with a history of seizures within the past year
  24. Subjects with brain tumors
  25. Subjects with intracranial aneurysms requiring treatment or arterial venous malformations (AVMs) requiring treatment
  26. Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  27. Any illness that in the investigator's opinion preclude participation in this study
  28. Subjects unable to communicate with the investigator and staff
  29. Pregnancy or lactation
  30. Subjects who have an overall Skull Density Ration lower than 0.40 as calculated from the screening CT

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ExAblate Treated Arm
ExAblate Transcranial System subthalamotomy for motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease.
ExAblate Transcranial System subthalamotomy for symptoms of Parkinson's Disease
Other Names:
  • Focused Ultrasound
  • MRgFUS
  • FUS
  • MR Guided Focused Ultrasound
Sham Comparator: ExAblate Sham Treated Arm
ExAblate Transcranial System sham subthalamotomy for motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. Sham subjects completing the 4 Month visit may be offered the actual ExAblate subthalamotomy.
ExAblate Transcranial System subthalamotomy for symptoms of Parkinson's Disease
Other Names:
  • Focused Ultrasound
  • MRgFUS
  • FUS
  • MR Guided Focused Ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence and severity of adverse events
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 months post treatment
Safety will evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with ExAblate subthalamotomy for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease motor features.
Baseline to 4 months post treatment
Mean change in MDS-UPDRS Part III scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 months post treatment
This is a feasibility trial with no hypothesis testing. Primary efficacy will be evaluated using basic summary statistics including comparison of between- and within-group differences in the mean change (from baseline to 4 months) of the motor MDS-UPDRS Part III score for the side contralateral to subthalamotomy in the off-medication condition.
Baseline to 4 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long Term Adverse Events Profile
Time Frame: Baseline to 12- months post treatment
Additional safety will be evaluated by follow up of adverse events through 12 months post treatment.
Baseline to 12- months post treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in MDS-UPDRS total score
Time Frame: Baseline to 12- months post treatment
Duration of outcomes will be further evaluated using the MDS-UPDRS total score
Baseline to 12- months post treatment
Mean change in MDS-UPDRS Part IV scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post treatment
Long term impact of ExAblate transcranial pallidotomy will be further evaluated using the MPS-UPDRS Part IV scores
Baseline to 12-months post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeff Elias, MD, University of Virginia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

September 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on ExAblate Transcranial System

Subscribe