Effects of Control Scan for Presumed Difficult Epidural Infiltrations (ECHORACHIS) (ECHORACHIS)

March 21, 2014 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Effects of Scan Control for Presumed Difficult Epidural Infiltrations: a Monocentric, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Simple Blind Trial

The aim of this care protocol is to study the effects of scan to help epidural infiltration realization, in presumed difficult patients suffering from sciatica.

These scans are already performed in our Rheumatology Department but our objective is to evaluate objectively its contribution for patients and doctors.

Epidural infiltration in young patients, with an easy anatomical identification, causes generally no technical difficulties, therefore this protocol will only include patients presumed to have a difficult infiltration, that means those aged more than 60, and/or with BMI > 30 and/or suffering from scoliosis.

This study concerns patients who are hospitalized in Rheumatology Department (Hospital of Nantes) for their first epidural infiltration for treatment-resistant lombosciatica.

Patient will be randomized at Day 0, before infiltration. This latter will be performed in accordance to current practice.

Tolerance data (pain and satisfaction) will be collected just after the infiltration and eventual complications will be reported within 48 hours after infiltration.

Following treatment of lombosciatic will be realized through hospitalization, as usual.

Scan is a safe, non invasive, painless and non radiating exam. It is the extension of the musculoskeletal clinical exam and it has already changed our rheumatology practices. The investigators hope at the end of this study, that results would confirm that scan can be a help in practice to perform epidural infiltrations.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patients hospitalized in Rheumatology Department for performing their first epidural infiltration when sciatica is resistant to medical treatment.
  • Inclusion of patients older than 60 years and / or BMI superior to 30 and / or scoliosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Anticoagulant or antiplatelet
  • History of spinal malformations type spina bifida
  • pregnancy
  • Age<18
  • Patients under guardianship
  • Patients participating to another clinical trial (except non interventional trials)
  • Patients unable to achieve the protocol, in the judgment of the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group " with scan prior to infiltration "
Scan will be conducted by the operator performing the gesture. He will examine the lumbar spine from L3 to S1, in longitudinal and cross sections and determine the best surgical approach. This will be defined by the largest interspinous space or better visibility of the epidural space. The depth of the epidural space will be noted. The selected stage will be marked with a skin pen to facilitate its location thereafter
Placebo Comparator: Group " without scan "
Patients will have a "dummy" lumber spine evaluation in order to put patients in blind conditions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale measuring the pain during infiltration
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
To evaluate if scan prior to epidural infiltration could improve its tolerance
10min after the infiltration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Infiltration evaluation: procedure time between skin passage and release of the needle
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration
Infiltration evaluation: attempts number before correct positioning of needle
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration
Infiltration evaluation: number of puncture sites
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration
Infiltration evaluation: number of failures
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration
Infiltration tolerance : VAS for pain (graduating from 0 to 10)
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Infiltration tolerance : infiltration complications (headaches, pain at the puncture site, other)
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Distance skin- épidural space (mm) L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration
Minimal interspinous distance (mm) L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration
Epidural space visibility L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1: 0 for " no visibility ", 1 for " mild ", 2 for " good "
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration
Epidural space accessibility L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 : 0 for " no visibility ", 1 for " mild ", 2 for " good "
Time Frame: 10min after the infiltration
10min after the infiltration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benoit LE GOFF, Doctor, Nantes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sciatica

Clinical Trials on Group " with scan prior to infiltration "

Subscribe