Continuous Versus Intermittent Sciatic Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

March 30, 2015 updated by: Kreiskrankenhaus Dormagen

Continuous Versus Intermittent Sciatic Block Combined With a Continuous Femoral Block for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Randomized Trial.

The role of a sciatic block in addition to a femoral block remains controversial. The study addresses this topic by comparing a continuous block versus an injection on demand.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dormagen, Germany, D-51375
        • KKH Dormagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • failure to establish femoral and sciatic block
  • insufficient analgesic effect of the block
  • patient declines to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: intermittent
injection of ropivacaine on demand
Other: continuous
continuous ropivacaine infusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pain score (VRS)
Time Frame: 4 days
4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
frequency of injections into the sciatic catheter
Time Frame: 4 days
4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine

Subscribe