Mobile Device to Help FRAX® Screening

April 22, 2014 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

The Effectiveness of Using Mobile Device and the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) to Assist Osteoporosis Assessment and Management

Background: The Taiwanese FRAX® (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) calculator is available online for clinical use. Our Taiwanese Osteoporosis Clinical Treatment Guidelines suggests using the American high risk cut-points for considering treatment but also suggests deriving domestic cut-points from cost-effective approach. Establishing cost-effective domestic cut-points for policy suggestions coupled with mobile devices with wireless access would potentially increase the usage of FRAX® tool.

Objectives: 1) Using literature review to establish cost-effectiveness FRAX® cut-points. 2) To assess the effectiveness of mobile devices assisted FRAX® tool based osteoporosis diagnostic and management model. 3) To provide FRAX® based reimbursement policy suggestions.

Methods: 1) Investigators will use FRAX®, cost-effectiveness and other key words to search Pubmed and international osteoporosis guidelines to better understand the clinical applications of FRAX® in other countries. Investigators will also search epidemiological data for osteoporosis, facture, quality of life and cost to establish domestic cost-effeteness, and translational approach FRAX® cut-points. 2) Three targeting populations from National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) are selected for prospective study (Group A: geriatric health exam clinics with American cut-points, group B: orthopedic clinics with translational approach cut-points and group C: endocrine clinics with cost-effectiveness cut-points,). A mobile device with app application coupled with the FRAX® tool is used by a trained research assistant during clinic waiting periods to screen and enroll high risk (75 from each clinic) adults with informed consents. Participants are referred to geriatric clinics for systemic osteoporosis diagnoses and managements. Percentage of participants that meet the current NHI medication reimbursement regulation and percentage of self-pay medications are calculated. Analysis is stratified by age and gender. 3) The impacts of 3 different cut-points on increment NHI reimbursement are estimated. An osteoporosis expert group meeting is to be held for FRAX® based osteoporosis medication reimbursement modifications to the NHI and the Department of Health.

Expected Outcomes: 1) To establish the mobile device assisted FRAX® based osteoporosis screening and management model. 2) Base on the study results and expert consensus, investigators will provide policy suggestions of FRAX® based reimbursement modifications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is an observational study. The study outcomes might base on clinical physician opnions to provide policy suggestion of FRAX® at which cut-point is considering for treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

225

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults visitng geraitric health exam clinics, orthopedic clinic, and endocrinology clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 40-90
  • screen high risk from FRAX

Exclusion Criteria:

  • treated with anti-osteoporosis medications within last 3-12 months (depends on medication types)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group A, B, C
Group A- American cut-point Group B- Translational approach cut-point Group C- Cost-effectiveness cut-point

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of enrollment cases
Time Frame: in 6 month
target 75 in each group, total 225
in 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ding-Cheng Chan, MD, PhD, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

3
Subscribe