To Compare Outcomes After Transurethral Enucleation of Prostate Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate

October 8, 2013 updated by: Palaniappan Sundaram, Singapore General Hospital
The purpose of the study is to assess whether transurethral enucleation of prostate gives better or equivalent outcomes compared to the gold standard of transurethral resection of the prostate

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Singapore
      • S'pore, Singapore, 120355
        • Singapore General Hospital
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Singapore General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Amles who underwent transurethral prostate surgeryr between 2006 and 2010

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All who underwent TURP or TUERP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with prostate cancer, neurogenic bladder, previous urethral or prostate surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TURP
Procedure: TURP, TUERP
TUERP
Procedure: TURP, TUERP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Maximum urinary flow rate
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Singapore General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012/311/D

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe