Randomized Experiment of Playworks

July 14, 2014 updated by: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Playworks has an impact on student and school outcomes such as physical activity, behavior, and academic performance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Playworks is a school-based program that places full-time coaches in low-income schools to organize games and activities during recess. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) contracted with Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractor, the John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities (JGC) at Stanford University, to conduct a rigorous evaluation of Playworks. Twenty-nine schools interested in implementing Playworks, across six cities in the United States, were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups during the 2010-2011 (cohort 1) or 2011-2012 (cohort 2) school year. Random assignment was conducted within matched groups of schools within each city. In total, there were 12 blocks of matched schools. For each block, one school was randomly assigned to the control group and the rest to the treatment group.

During the one-year study period for each cohort, treatment schools received Playworks and control schools were not eligible to implement Playworks. Data from student surveys, accelerometers, and teacher surveys were collected from 4th- and 5th-grade students, teachers, and school staff roughly seven months after Playworks was first implemented in treatment schools.

For the student survey, students were asked to complete a 30-minute student survey in the spring of their study year about their experiences at school. A team of experienced survey administration staff administered the survey in the students' classrooms. In addition to the student survey, teachers were asked to complete a teacher survey that asked teachers about their students' experiences at school.

A subsample of students that were asked to complete the student survey also wore accelerometers during one or two school days. During the accelerometer data collection period, the research team arrived at participating classrooms at the beginning of the school day. Team members described the function of the accelerometer and then attached one to each consented student's hip, using an elastic belt. The accelerometer data was then processed with the ActiLife 5 software package.

The impact of Playworks on study outcomes was estimated by comparing the average outcomes in treatment and control schools using regression models customized to the unit of analysis (teacher or student). The regression models used for analysis included indicators for random assignment blocks to account for the blocked design and school-specific random error terms to account for school-specific effects not attributable to the treatment. Covariates were also included in some models to account for significant differences between treatment and control groups in demographic characteristics. Models for continuous and binary outcome variables were fit using least-squares estimation and logistic regression estimation, respectively. Standard errors for the estimated impacts on teacher- and student-level outcomes accounted for clustering at the school level using generalized estimating equations. Model-based p-values and effect sizes were calculated based on the estimated impacts and corresponding standard errors and multiple comparison adjustments accounted for correlations among the multiple tests. Sampling weights were used when estimating impacts. The weights were constructed to account for both the selection probabilities of students and teachers into the sample and nonresponse.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2278

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Princeton, New Jersey, United States, 08543-2393
        • Mathematica Policy Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students in low-income schools in urban areas
  • Students in schools where at least 50 percent of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Playworks
Playworks was implemented during the entire school year, and outcome measures were collected in spring of the school year.
The Playworks program places full-time coaches in low-income schools to provide opportunities for organized play during recess and throughout the school day.
No Intervention: Control
Playworks was not implemented at these schools.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean Number of Accelerometer Intensity Counts Recorded Per Minute During Recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Mean Number of Steps Taken Per Minute During Recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Mean Percentage of Accelerometer Wear Time During Recess Spent in Sedentary Activity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Mean Percentage of Accelerometer Wear Time During Recess Spent in Light Activity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Mean Percentage of Accelerometer Wear Time During Recess Spent in Moderately Intense Activity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Mean Percentage of Accelerometer Wear Time During Recess Spent in Vigorously Intense Activity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of Students Who Participate in Recess Activities That Make Them Sweat and Breathe Hard "Sometimes" or "A Lot"
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Teachers Who "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" That Their Students Participate in Physical Activities That Make Them Sweat and Breathe Hard During Recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Participated in a Sports Team After School or on the Weekend During the School Year
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Participated in Dance, Gymnastics or Martial Arts Lessons After School or on the Weekend During the School Year
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Participation in Individual Activities During Recess Scale Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Participation in Games During Recess Scale Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That the Following Happens "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Adults help them play games and sports during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That the Following Happens "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Their teacher helps them play games and sports during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That the Following Happens "Sometimes" or "A Lot": They talk with friends during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Recess Behavior and Readiness for Class Scale Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Recess Misbehavior/Discipline Scale Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Ask an adult to help them solve a conflict during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Get teased about not being good at games or sports during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Get into an argument with other students during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Fight or hit other students during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Work out problems with other students during recess without fighting
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Say encouraging things to other students during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Enjoyment of Recess Scale Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Agree "A Little" or "A Lot" That They: Like to play games and sports at recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Agree "A Little" or "A Lot" That They: Feel like they can join other kids in a game on the playground
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Agree "A Little" or "A Lot" That They: Feel left out at recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Get to play a game that they want during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Students Who Report That They Do the Following "Sometimes" or "A Lot": Have to play a game that adults want them to play during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Games and Sports Self-Concept Scale Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Teachers Who "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" That Their Students: Look forward to recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Teachers Who "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" That Their Students: Enjoy adult-organized activities at recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Teachers Who "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" That Their Students: Would be upset about missing recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Percentage of Teachers Who "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" That Their Students: Feel ownership over their activities during recess
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susanne James-Burdumy, Mathematica Policy Research
  • Study Director: Martha Bleeker, Mathematica Policy Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MPR-06758
  • 12-177 (Other Identifier: New England Institutional Review Board)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Focus on Physical Activity, Recess, and Play

Subscribe