Efficacy and Safety of Free Combination of Tiotropium + Formoterol Compared to Formoterol and Tiotropium in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

September 11, 2014 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Crossover Efficacy and Safety Comparison of 6-week Treatment Periods of the Free Combination of Tiotropium Inhalation Powder Capsule (18 μg) + Formoterol Inhalation Powder Capsule (12 μg) QD, Tiotropium Inhalation Powder Capsule (18 μg) QD and Formoterol Inhalation Powder Capsule (12 μg) BID in Patients With COPD

Study to evaluate the lung function response to the free once-daily combination of tiotropium + formoterol compared to formoterol BID and tiotropium QD

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All patients had to sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the trial, which included medication washout and restrictions
  2. All patients had to have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and had to meet the following spirometric criteria:

    • Patients had to have relatively stable moderate to severe airway obstruction with an FEV1 ≤ 60% of predicted normal and FEV1 ≤ 70% of FVC (Visits 1 and 2)
  3. Male or female patients 40 years of age or older
  4. Patients had to be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack-years (Patients who had never smoked cigarettes had to be excluded)
  5. Patients had to be able to perform technically acceptable pulmonary function tests and had to be able to maintain records (Patient Daily Diary Record) during the study period as required in the protocol
  6. Patients had to be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the HandiHaler® device, the Blue Inhaler device and from a metered dose inhaler (MDI)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with significant diseases other than COPD had to be excluded. A significant disease was defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study
  2. Patients with clinically relevant abnormal baseline haematology, blood chemistry, or urinalysis if the abnormality defined a disease listed as an exclusion criterion
  3. All patients with an serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) > 80 IU/L, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) > 80 IU/L, bilirubin > 17 μmol/L or creatinine > 110 μmol/L (males) / 95 μmol/L (females) had to be excluded regardless of clinical condition
  4. Patients with a recent history (i.e., six months or less) of myocardial infarction
  5. Patients with any cardiac arrhythmia requiring drug therapy or who had been hospitalised for heart failure within the past three years
  6. Patients with a history of cancer within the last five years. Patients with treated basal cell carcinoma were allowed
  7. Patients with known symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction.

    Patients with prostatic hypertrophy controlled by medication were allowed

  8. Patients with known narrow-angle glaucoma
  9. Patients with a history of asthma, allergic rhinitis or who had a total blood eosinophil count ≥600 mm3
  10. Patients with a history of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, or a history of cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis
  11. Patients with known active tuberculosis
  12. Patients with a history of and/or active significant alcohol or drug abuse. See exclusion criterion No. 1.
  13. Patients who had undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of thoracotomy for other reasons had to be evaluated as per exclusion criterion No. 1
  14. Patients who completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the six weeks prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1)
  15. Patients who regularly used daytime oxygen therapy
  16. Patients who had taken an investigational drug within one month or six half lives (whichever is greater) prior to Screening Visit (Visit 1)
  17. Patients who were treated with beta-blocker medications. Note: cardioselective beta blocker eye medications (e.g. Betoptic®) for treatment of non-narrow angle glaucoma were allowed
  18. Patients who were treated with oral beta-adrenergics
  19. Patients who were treated with cromolyn sodium or nedocromil sodium
  20. Patients who were treated with antihistamines (H1 receptor antagonists), antileukotrienes or leukotriene receptor antagonists for asthma or excluded allergic conditions. See exclusion criterion No. 9
  21. Patients using oral corticosteroid medication at unstable doses (i.e., less than six weeks on a stable dose) or at doses in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone per day or 20 mg every other day
  22. Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, beta-adrenergics, lactose or any other components of the inhalation capsule delivery systems
  23. Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception for the previous 3 months (i.e. oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm or subdermal implants e.g., Norplant®)
  24. Patients with previous participation (receipt of randomised treatment) in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tiotropium + formoterol
Active Comparator: tiotropium
Active Comparator: formoterol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in area under the curve from pre-dose to 12 hours of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 AUC0-12h)
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in FEV1 AUC0-24h
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in FEV1 AUC12-24h
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in AUC of the forced vital capacity (FVC AUC0-12h)
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in FVC AUC0-24h
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in FVC AUC12-24h
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in peak FEV1 response
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in trough FEV1 response
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in peak FVC response
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Change in trough FVC response
Time Frame: after 6 weeks of each treatment
after 6 weeks of each treatment
Individual FEV1measurements at each time point
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
up to 6 weeks
Individual FVCmeasurements at each time point
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
up to 6 weeks
Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)
Time Frame: weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
measured twice daily
weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
Number of inhalations of rescue salbutamol therapy used per day
Time Frame: weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
Assessment of daytime COPD symptom score rated on a 6-point rating scale
Time Frame: weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
Assessment of nighttime COPD symptom score rated on a 5-point rating scale
Time Frame: weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
weeks 4 to 6 of each treatment period
Number of patients with adverse events
Time Frame: up to 23 weeks
up to 23 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2002

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Tiotropium

Subscribe