3T MR Angiography of the Hepatic Vasculature

April 15, 2019 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

3T MR Angiography of the Hepatic Vasculature: A Pilot Comparison Study of New Noncontrast Techniques to Post-contrast Technique and CT Angiography in Liver Donors.

This study plans to learn more about the two Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) techniques.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will use two Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) techniques that will look at participants liver veins and arteries without giving a coloring matter (contrast) before taking the images. Investigators propose to evaluate the usefulness of these two new techniques, which do not involve exposing participants to radiation or contrast.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects that fulfill the criteria for living liver donation and are evaluated for the procedure with CT and MR.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Unable to comply with breathing or other imaging related instructions resulting in inability to obtain diagnostic quality MRI studies
  • Not suitable to undergo MRI with a gadolinium-based contrast agent because of:

    • Claustrophobia, unless patient agrees to sedation measures per institutional standard practice during MR imaging
    • Presence of metallic objects or implanted medical devices in body per institutional safety standards
    • Weight greater than that allowable by the MR table
    • Renal failure, as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) model based on a serum creatinine level obtained within 28 days prior to enrollment
    • Known allergy-like reaction to contrast media (gadolinium) or moderate or severe allergic reactions to one or more allergens as defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR), and unwillingness to undergo pre-treatment as defined by the institution's policy and/or ACR guidance
    • Pregnancy (if a female is of childbearing potential --defined as a premenopausal female capable of becoming pregnant --a pregnancy test should be done)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Subjects who fulfill the criteria for living liver donation
Subjects who fulfill the criteria for living liver donation and are evaluated for the procedure with Computerized Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
MRI sequences for visualisation of the blood supply of liver without contrast agent.
CT including CT Angiography (CTA) for the evaluation of hepatic vasculature.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Liver Blood Supply Diameters
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
The Visibility of the Variations of the Liver Blood Supply
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Detection Rates of the Variations of the Liver Blood Supply
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
The Percentage of Examinations With the Presence of Significant Artifacts Interfering Interpretation.
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
How Badly the Artifacts Prevented Evaluation by the Reader.
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
The Relative Signal Intensity of the Liver Blood Supply
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Documentation of Acquisition Time
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Percentage of Examinations That Caused Adverse Events
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samuel Chang, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14-1213

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Participant data will only be shared to research personnel.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe