Evaluation of Quality of Care - Haemodialysis Public-Private-Partnership, Hospital Authority (QoC HDPPP)

September 5, 2017 updated by: Professor Cindy L.K. Lam, The University of Hong Kong

Evaluation of Quality of Care - Haemodialysis Public-Private-Partnership, Hospital Authority (HA)

Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) have lost the function to excrete urea and maintain electrolyte balance, which is lethal unless they are given renal replacement therapy (Gibney, Hoste et al. 2008). As one of the initiatives of service improvement, the HA has introduced the haemodialysis public-private partnership (HD PPP) programme to shorten the waiting time for patients with ESRF needing HD treatment. HD PPP programme is a new service provision model that purchases healthcare services from non-Government healthcare organizations. The evaluation on the quality of care (QOC) is an essential part of the programme in order to inform future policy. The Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care of the University of Hong Kong has been appointed by the HA to carry out the evaluation of the QOC of the programme.

The Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure whether the target standard of care intended by the HD PPP programme is achieved. Each HD PPP participating hospitals and centers will be invited to complete a structure evaluation questionnaire. Sixty patients who have agreed to join HD PPP and 60 control patients who have refused to take part in HD PPP will be included. The participants will be followed up by telephone to evaluate the effect of the programme on quality of life (QOL), patient enablement, and global rating of change in health condition. Data on the process of care and clinical outcomes of care will be retrieved from the HA medical records.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are the proportion of participants who have received the planned process of care and adequate haemodialysis (HD) measured by the Kt/V

Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics on proportions meeting the QOC criteria will be calculated. The outcomes of HD PPP subjects will be compared at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months by paired sample t-test. The outcomes between HD PPP subjects and control group will be compared by independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.

Results: The QOC of the HD PPP programme will be determined. Areas of deficiency and possible areas for quality enhancement will be identified.

Conclusion: The results of this study will provide empirical evidence on whether the HD PPP can achieve equivalent QOC as the usual HA care in order to guide service planning and policy decision making for patients with ESRF.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

125

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Sixty patients currently being followed up at the HA on HD, PD, or are new ESRF cases will be recruited. Both PD and new ESRF cases must fulfill certain inclusion criterion to take part in the study. The PD patients will be enrolled into the HD PPP if they have poor ultrafiltration, inadequate dialysis, or with frequent bacterial/fungal peritonitis that failed to put back on PD; whereas new ESRF patients will be enrolled if they have previously had multiple/extensive abdominal surgeries or have any abdominal pathology that makes PD not feasible. Patients who do not have a good vascular access, are not hemodynamically stable for HD, are not mentally sound, ambulatory and independent, are unable to understand and communicate in Chinese language, or refuse to give consent will be excluded from the HD PPP programme.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients currently being followed up at the HA on haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or are new ESRF cases will be recruited.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not have a good vascular access, are not hemodynamically stable for HD, are not mentally sound, ambulatory and independent, are unable to understand and communicate in Chinese language, or refuse to give consent will be excluded from the HD PPP programme.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
End-stage renal failure (ESRF)
end-stage renal failure (ESRF)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of centers that have satisfied each of the set structure criteria.
Time Frame: Five years
Interim analysis will evaluate in October, 2010; October, 2011; October, 2012; October, 2013; October, 2014
Five years
The proportion of patients who have complied with the HD PPP process of care.
Time Frame: Five years
Interim analysis will evaluate in June, 2011; December, 2011; December, 2012; December, 2013; December, 2014
Five years
The proportion of patients who have adequate HD measured by the Kt/V.
Time Frame: Five years
Interim analysis will evaluate in June, 2011; December, 2011, December, 2012; December, 2013; December, 2014
Five years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcomes include decompensation episodes, pre-dialysis serum calcium level, blood pressure (BP), LDL-C, patient mortality and adverse clinical events.
Time Frame: Five years
Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 months after enrolment
Five years
Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are measured by the change in Short Form -12v2 scores, the Patient ennoblement index and Global Rating of Change Scale scores
Time Frame: Five years
Baseline and 6-month/12-month/24-month/36-month after the first administration of questionnaire.
Five years
Service utilization outcomes are measured by General Out-patient Clinics consultation, renal Specialist Out-patient Clinics consultation, A&E attendance rates and hospitalization rate in the past 12 months.
Time Frame: Five years
Baseline and 12 months for each subject; the audit cycle will be repeated annually over a period of 5 years.
Five years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Cindy L.K. Lam, MD, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
  • Principal Investigator: Julie Chen, MD, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculity of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End-stage Renal Failure (ESRF)

Subscribe