Optimising Cognitive Function in Patients With Chronic Pain

March 21, 2017 updated by: Katharine Baker, Monash University
Cognitive difficulties often occur with chronic pain. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to determine whether various aspects of cognitive function can be improved. An 8-week course of cognitive training via a web-based training program (3 times per week) will be contrasted with watching informative documentary videos (for the same length of time). Outcomes include subjective and objective measures of cognition, as well as self-report measures of mood and pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale for project:

Cognitive difficulties may occur with chronic pain, potentially indicative of compromised functioning in frontal brain regions, which also results in greater difficulty controlling pain, with increased rumination and worry. Discovering a successful method for strengthening these neural systems may improve cognitive skills important for daily life and maximise therapeutic outcomes.

Research questions:

In people experiencing cognitive deficits due to their pain condition:

  1. Can neurocognitive abilities be improved?
  2. Can such improvements bring about better daily functioning in general?
  3. If these training protocols improve cognition, will there also be an effect of pain reduction, i.e., in the extent to which pain interferes with a person's life?

Aim:

The overarching aim of this research is to determine whether cognitive function can be improved via a training protocol in people experiencing cognitive difficulties related to chronic pain.

Design:

This is a randomised controlled trial examining the effects of cognitive training compared with an active control. The investigators aim to enrol 40 participants with chronic pain in the study: 20 training, and 20 active control. This sample size was chosen based on a power analysis with moderate effect size, and is consistent with sample sizes in the existing cognitive training literature, though no similar study has so far been done in a chronic pain population. Both groups will complete their respective study activities 3 times per week, for 45 minutes each time, across 8 weeks. They will be assessed before completing the 8-week period, and again within a few days of completion.

Procedures:

40 participants will be recruited via the Caulfield Pain Management and Research Centre.

After deciding to participate and meeting all inclusion criteria, participants will be invited to attend their first on-site assessment session at Monash University, Clayton. The first assessment session will include an overview of the training program and demonstration of how to do the tasks, or an overview of the active control activities (as applicable). Both assessment sessions will involve detailed assessment of cognition, pain, and mood.

The cognitive training protocol will be run using pre-validated software that delivers brain training "games". The games are designed to be visually interesting and engaging, and are varied so that each session will comprise multiple different games, to avoid boredom. They begin with easy-to-follow instructions and demonstrations, then as the participant progresses, the difficulty is automatically increased in correspondence with their performance, to avoid ceiling or plateau effects. Participants will be assigned a program targeting multiple facets of cognition found to be compromised in chronic pain states, including divided attention, working memory, mentally planning a sequence of items to form a pattern or complete a puzzle, and response inhibition.

This software is accessible via the internet on desktop and laptop computers, or on tablet devices. All training sessions will be completed at home. The researchers will hold a master account, allowing them to log in and monitor participant progress and compliance with the training.

The active control group will be provided with a variety of videos to watch, the content of which will be in the style of documentaries on general interest topics such as nature, travel, culture, and history. These are also visually stimulating and engaging, but involve no increment in difficulty. They may provide distraction from pain and may be relaxing.

Throughout the protocol, the researchers will have weekly contact with participants by phone or video call. Keeping regular contact in this way will maintain engagement with the research team, help boost motivation and allow participants to express any issues they may be having with the protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Melbourne, Australia
        • Monash University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain condition
  • Access to computer and internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High dosages of opioid or benzodiazepine medication
  • Currently receiving active allied health treatment
  • Intellectual disability, traumatic brain injury, dementia, or other neurological disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computerised cognitive training
The cognitive training protocol will be run using pre-validated software, HappyNeuronPro, that delivers cognitive training games. The games are designed to be visually interesting and engaging, and are varied so that each session will comprise multiple different games, to avoid boredom. They begin with easy-to-follow instructions and demonstrations, then as the participant progresses, the difficulty is automatically increased in correspondence with their performance, to avoid ceiling or plateau effects. Participants will be assigned a program targeting multiple facets of cognition found to be compromised in chronic pain states, including divided attention, working memory, mentally planning a sequence of items to form a pattern or complete a puzzle, and response inhibition.
Active Comparator: Video watching
This group will be provided with a variety of videos to watch, the content of which will be in the style of documentaries on general interest topics such as nature, travel, culture, and history. Each video is followed by multiple-choice questions that participants will answer, to ensure attention was engaged. The videos are visually stimulating and engaging, but involve no increment in difficulty or requirement to improve skills. They may provide some distraction from pain and may be relaxing, interesting and informative.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective cognitive functioning
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Composite of neuropsychological test scores
8 weeks
Subjective cognitive functioning
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Self-report measures of cognition
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Pain intensity and interference from the Brief Pain Inventory
8 weeks
Mood and coping
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Self-report measures of anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy
8 weeks
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Electrophysiological measure
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melita Giummarra, PhD, Monash University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CF14/2985 - 2014001639

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Computerised cognitive training

Subscribe