Feasibility and Acceptability of Home-based Computerised Cognitive Training After Cardiac Surgery (FACCT)

April 4, 2023 updated by: Barts & The London NHS Trust
The aims of this study are to (1) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a home-based computerised cognitive training programme in the postoperative cardiac surgical population, and (2) estimate measures of precision about the mean and variance of cognitive outcome to inform sample size calculations for a subsequent efficacy study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heart surgery is a common procedure for coronary heart disease (blocked or narrowed coronary arteries) and valve problems (narrowing or hardening of the heart valves). It is known that after surgery some patients experience problems with their 'cognitive health' - this includes aspects like memory problems, concentration, and attention. These cognitive health problems can last for several months and can have a considerable impact on patients, and their family.

Cognitive training (which means exercising the brain) has been shown to improve cognitive health in a number of patient groups including healthy older adults, patients with heart failure, and patients with mild cognitive impairment. The aim of this study is to find out if home-based computerised cognitive training (CCT) improves cognitive health after heart surgery.

Investigators will recruit adult (≥ 18 years) patients undergoing first time elective cardiac surgery, who are willing to engage with an online training programme, and due to the nature of the intervention, potential participants must have access to a computer or tablet and access to the internet.

Before surgery, a brief cognitive assessment will be carried out. Participants will be asked to complete 20 minutes of cognitive training exercises, 5 days per week, starting one week after their operation. A member of the research team will contact the patient once a week to check progress, to provide support, and to help with any technical issues.

After the 8-week CCT (brain training exercises) programme, a follow-up video call will be arranged. During this follow-up participants will complete a second cognitive assessment and a questionnaire to see how acceptable and helpful they found the brain training exercises.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7DN
        • Barts Health NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years old undergoing first time elective cardiac surgery
  • Willing to engage with an online cognitive training programme
  • Access to a computer or table with access to the internet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to give written informed consent
  • significant psychiatric or medical comorbidities where that condition might impact on cognitive function and affect their ability to participate.
  • Inability to understand written and / or verbal English
  • Those with motor symptoms that would impede their ability to complete the programme
  • Those unwilling or unable to engage in a video call

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home-based computerised cognitive training
Participants will be asked to complete 40 sessions (20 minutes / day, 5 days / week) of cognitive training over the 8-week intervention period (this will be assessed using automated data reports of user activity generated in collaboration with BrainHQ). Training will commence one week postoperatively to avoid the effects of sedatives, postoperative pain, sleep deprivation, and patient fatigue, and to improve adherence
Participants will be registered for individual accounts to an online CCT program created by BrainHQ (Posit Science, San Francisco), that can be administered using their own computer or tablet. BrainHQ has been associated with improvements in memory, attention, and processing speed. The program will be customised to target domains thought to be deficient in the postoperative period and will include training in memory, attention, and processing speed. Specifically, the following six games have been selected: hear, hear (auditory memory and attention), to-do list training (working memory), divided attention (attention), target tracker (attention), double decision (useful field of view and visual processing speed), and eye for detail (visual processing speed and visual working memory). The exercises are adaptive, adjusting the application difficulty to the participants performance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participants included from eligible patients; satisfactory recruitment defined as enrolment of ≥ 50% of eligible patients.
6 months
Study retention
Time Frame: 6 months
Satisfactory retention rate ≥ 75% of participants completing the 8-week training programme
6 months
Recruitment target
Time Frame: 6 months
The time required to meet the target recruitment of 30 patients
6 months
Feasibility of testing procedures
Time Frame: 6 months
% of participants where outcome testing was completed
6 months
Feasibility of data collection methods
Time Frame: 6 months
% of participants with complete data sets
6 months
Adherence to the intervention: number of sessions
Time Frame: 6 months
Compliance to measure the feasibility of the study; the number of sessions completed out of the 40 planned sessions during the 8-week intervention
6 months
Adherence to the intervention: total time
Time Frame: 6 months
Compliance to measure the feasibility of the study; the total time completed out of the planned 800 minutes during the 8-week intervention
6 months
Acceptability, by participant report
Time Frame: measured after the 8 week intervention (ie 8-10 weeks)
The theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) questionnaire has been adapted to this study, in collaboration with one of the TFA development team, to evaluate participants' perceptions of the intervention. The questionnaire was designed to inductively evaluate the retrospective acceptability of the intervention. The seven-item questionnaire will provide a five-point Likert scale reporting method in relation to their agreement statements, where the minimum value is 5 and maximum value is 35, with a higher score indicating higher acceptability.
measured after the 8 week intervention (ie 8-10 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
to estimate measures of precision about the mean and variance of cognitive outcome to inform sample size calculations for a subsequent efficacy study.
Time Frame: 6 months
Cognitive function will be measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The MoCA is a brief, 30-question test of global cognition, designed to detect mild cognitive impairment with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. The MoCA takes approximately 10 minutes to administer, and will be measured upon enrolment and after the 8-week intervention. A score of 26 (out of 30) or higher is considered normal.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tracey Bowden, MSc, Barts & The London NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There are no plans to share the data consistent with ethics approvals and consent.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Home-based computerised cognitive training with BrainHQ

3
Subscribe