Supporting Self-management of Chronic Pain

Supporting Self-management in Chronic Pain: a Collaborative Approach Providing Relevant Tools to Healthcare Professionals and People With Pain.

Does the Navigator Tool Intervention improve communication regarding self-management during consultations between healthcare professionals and people with chronic pain?

As there is usually no cure for chronic pain, healthcare professionals are increasingly turning to methods of treatment that emphasise management of symptoms rather than elimination of pain. However, as Pain Concern's previous research has shown, there are several barriers to self-management that both healthcare professionals and people with pain face in their consultations in primary care. The Navigator Tool Intervention has been designed to overcome the majority of these barriers through improving the quality of communication regarding self-management during consultations.

In line with the House of Care Model, where care relies on engaged and informed patients, healthcare professionals committed to partnership working, and organisational processes that support this, our intervention prepares both the healthcare professionals and patients for their consultation. By providing a training session for the healthcare professionals in how supported self-management can be brought into the consultation room, and by providing the patients with a paper-based tool that allows them to organise their concerns and questions prior to the consultation, the intervention aims to steer the conversation toward the aspects that the patient needs to discuss in order to better manage their pain.

This study will launch the intervention and evaluate its effectiveness in improving self-management support through conversation. It will be launched over a 3 month period in 4 sites across Scotland; 24 patients will be using the tool with a trained healthcare professional and 24 will act as a control group, receiving standard care without the tool.

Questionnaires assessing the satisfaction with the consultation(s) and communication, as well as confidence in managing one's pain, will be analysed and compared between the two groups. Interviews will be carried out with healthcare professionals and a sample of patients having used the tool to gain a deeper understanding of the usefulness of the intervention and how it may be improved in the future.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Chronic Pain; Chronic Pain Syndrome; Chronic Pain, Widespread; Chronic Pain Due to Trauma; Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding); Chronic Pain Due to Injury; Chronic Pain Post-Procedural; Chronic Pain Hip
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: The Navigator Tool Intervention

Detailed Description

This study will involve 4 primary care sites across Scotland, 4-8 healthcare professionals (HCPs) who will administer the intervention, and 48 patient participants (1-2 HCPs and 12 patients at each site). Half of the patient participants will act as the control group and receive no intervention.

4 sites within primary care will be recruited through Pain Concern's current network of healthcare professionals. The sites will consists of general practitioners, physiotherapists and pharmacists, to ensure that the study reflects the usefulness of the intervention across primary care. Each site will nominate 1-2 healthcare professionals who will undergo a training session to learn about supported self-management and how to use the paper-based Navigator Tool effectively. This training will be developed as a collaboration between Pain Concern and the Thistle Foundation, an organisation specializing in supporting self-management for people living with chronic conditions.

Each site will identify 12 patients from their practice who will be asked to participate in the study. With their consent, the patient's contact details will be passed to the researcher who will contact them over the phone and inform them of what the study entails. Prior to this phone call, the patients will have received a written information and a consent sheet through email, post or in person at their practice. The signed consent sheet can be returned the in same way. Once recruited, the participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (24 patients) or the control group (24 patients).

Once allocated to a group, the participant will be sent a pre-intervention pack. There will be two versions of this pack, one for the intervention group and one for the control group. Both packs will contain a Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and the pack for the intervention group will contain a copy of the Navigator Tool. The participants will be instructed to fill out the questionnaire straight away and return it to the researcher through email or post.

During the active research period (3months), the intervention group will have 2-3 consultations using the tool with a healthcare professional who has undergone the training session. The control group will receive "standard care", i.e. they will not have access to the paper-based tool, and they will be allocated whatever healthcare professional they would have seen if they had not been in the study. There will be no regulation of how many consultations these control participants will have during the research period.

After the 3 month active research period, all patient participants be sent a post-intervention pack. The intervention and control group will be sent identical packs, consisting of a demographics questionnaire, another PSEQ, and a Consultation Quality Index -2 (CQI-2) (which includes the CARE measure).

The scores will be compared between the control and active group and indicate the effect intervention has on our outcome measures. The two most important outcome measures are improvement in communication (measured by CQI-2) and improvement in confidence of pain management (PSEQ). Other outcome measures include engagement with the intervention, perceived participation in decision making, consultations and relational satisfaction and patient-centeredness, extent to which GP was enabling to the patients and perceived efficacy for self-management, scores of which will also be derived from the above questionnaires.

A more in-depth follow-up interview will be conducted with all HCPs and a sample of patient participants (8 patients) spread out over the 4 sites. These interviews will provide a more specific, nuanced and individual understanding of the patients' and healthcare professionals' satisfaction with the intervention and quality of consultations. Possible topics include ease of use, impact on consultation length, effectiveness of communication, required changes to the intervention, and extent to which the intervention achieved aims. These interviews will take place 1-2 months after the last consultation with the tool has taken place, last for around 30-45 minutes, and will be conducted in a venue close to the primary care site the participant was recruited from.

The interviews will be recorded and the researcher will then transcribe the interviews and code them using N-vivo. Themes will be elicited and cross-compared between the participants to establish prevalent experiences, views and attitudes.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 35
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • Scotland
    • Auchterarder, Scotland, United Kingdom, PH3 1JH
      • St Margaret's Health Centre
    • Dunbar, Scotland, United Kingdom, EH42 1EE
      • Whitesands Medical Practice
    • Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 6RU
      • St Triduana's Medical Practice
    • Milngavie, Scotland, United Kingdom, G62 7AA
      • Milngavie Clinic
    • Muirhead, Scotland, United Kingdom, DD2 5NH
      • Muirhead Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Be over 18 years of age
• Have experienced pain for more than 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

• Being unable to communicate in English
• Being unable to attend consultations with a healthcare professional for the duration of the project
• Being currently participating in another research project regarding chronic pain

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention Group (using Navigator Tool); The participants will receive a copy of the Navigator Tool Intervention, a paper-based information pack including the My Pain Concerns Form, suggested questions to ask your healthcare professional, a goal setting sheet and information on common self-management strategies. They will be encouraged to fill in some of the forms before the consultation, and some during the consultation. They will have consultations with a healthcare professional who has undergone a Self-management Awareness Training with the Thistle Foundation.	Other: The Navigator Tool Intervention; The intervention consists of two parts; a training session on self-management of chronic conditions for the healthcare professionals, and a paper-based tool for the patients. Both parts aim to inform and prepare the two parties as to what self-management entails in order to facilitate a constrictive consultation.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control Group (not using Navigator Tool); These participants will not have access to the Navigator Tool Intervention, and will have consultations with a healthcare professional who has not undergone the Self-management Awareness Training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Transcripts of semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals and patients from Intervention group	Transcripts will be analysed and coded for themes and attitudes, similar concerns and experiences regarding the experience of using the intervention.	Interviews will be carried out 1-2 months after the intervention has finished (the last consultation has taken place).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Consultation Quality Index - 2 (CQI-2)	Assesses improvement and satisfaction with the communication during consultations. (Patients only)	Distributed to participants 1 week after the intervention has finished, they will return the filled in questionnaire within 1-2 weeks of having received it.
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)	Assesses improvement to the patients ability to confidently manage their own pain.	First one distributed 1 week before the intervention starts, to be completed and submitted within 1 week. Second will be distributed 1 week after the intervention has ended, to be returned within 1-2 weeks after having received it.
CARE measure	Assesses satisfaction with the communication during consultations. (Patients only)	Distributed to participants 1 week after the intervention has finished, they will return the filled in questionnaire within 1-2 weeks of having received it.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Transcripts of semi structured interviews with healthcare professionals and patients from the intervention group.	Transcripts will be analysed and coded to elicit attitudes toward strengths and weaknesses of the intervention. It will identify possible improvements and changes to make the intervention easier to use and/or more effective.	Interviews will be carried out 1-2 months after the intervention has finished (the last consultation has taken place).

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Pain Concern
• Collaborators: The Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE); Edinburgh and Lothians Health Foundation
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Pamela F Bell, MB FFARCSI FFPMCAI FFPMRCA, Pain Concern

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): August 28, 2017
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): March 19, 2018
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): March 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 11, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 18, 2017
• First Posted (ACTUAL): April 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): April 5, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 4, 2018
• Last Verified: April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: chronic pain; self-management; primary care; pain management; doctor patient communication
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Chronic Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: 223092

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No