Establishment of Patient Derived Cancer Cell Models to Interrogate Novel Molecular Targets in Metastatic Cancer

June 13, 2022 updated by: Jeeyun Lee, Samsung Medical Center

With rapid advances in molecular oncology, the availability of preclinical in vitro cell models and in vivo animal models with specific genomic aberrations is critical for improved prediction of clinical outcomes in cancer patients. One of the most widely used preclinical models is conventional cell lines, such as the NCI-60 panel of cell lines;these cell lines are widely used in preclinical testing for novel targeted drugs, partially owing to the low expense and reduced labor associated with cell culture compared with other preclinical models, such as animal xenografts. However, recent studies have shown that accumulation of genetic aberrations in cancer cell lines occurs with increasing passage number. These models also lack the heterogeneity of tumors and do not exhibit a proper microenvironment, highlighting the limitations of cell-based models. Consistent with this, Johnson et al. demonstrated that in vivo activities of the cell lines within the NCI-60 panel did not closely correlate with corresponding human cancers.

Therefore, to better preserve the genomic integrity and tumor heterogeneity observed in patients, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are being used more frequently. PDX is generated by directly transplanting freshly resected patient tumors into immunocompromised murine hosts with or without an intermediate in vitro culture step. This PDX model is an improvement over cell lines because it can provide both an appropriate tumor microenvironment and heterogeneity of tumor cells. However, the engraftment success rates and growth rates of implanted tumors are highly variable depending on the tumor type, possibly due to insufficient numbers of hematopoietic cells and/or ineffective microenvironmental cues in the mouse stroma. The extent to which tumor cells from freshly resected tumors are able to withstand mechanical stresses and xenotransplantation barriers is also unclear. Furthermore, the use of PDX models for application in clinical oncology is limited owing to the time required for PDX establishment (> 4 months) since most patients with refractory cancer live less than 1 year. Recently, PDC line models have been suggested as an alternative preclinical model to be used as a prediction tool for preclinical drug sensitivity.

Therefore, in this study, the investigators aimed to overcome these potential barriers of pre-existing models by examining the capacity of PDC line models to recapitulate the histological and genomic features of primary patient tumors. In selected cases, the investigators screened drug sensitivity in vitro using PDC lines and compared the results with real-life clinical treatment outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Korea
      • Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of, 135-720
        • Recruiting
        • Samsung Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • yoon jeong ahn
          • Phone Number: 82-2-2148-7395
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeeyun Lee, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

inclusion criteria are as follows: age ≥ 18 years; pathologically confirmed solid cancer; presence of metastatic lesion(s) not amenable to surgical treatment and having malignant effusion in the body cavity which needed to be drained by percutaneous methods for therapeutic purpose.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years.
  • Patients with histologically confirmed cancer
  • Written informed consent form
  • Presence of metastatic lesion(s) not amenable to surgical treatment and having malignant effusion in the body cavity which needed to be drained by percutaneous methods for therapeutic purpose.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent disease or condition that would make the subject inappropriate for study participation or any serious medical condition that would interfere with the subject's safety.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
molecular profiling, patient derived cells

molecular profiling,patient derived cells sample and experimental methods-Blood sample,tumor tissue or primary cultures of human effusions.

Malignant ascites, pleural effusions, or pericardial effusions will be collected from patients with metastatic cancer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
molecular screening(collected of blood,tumor tissue Malignant ascites, pleural effusions, or pericardial effusions will be analyzed)
Time Frame: At the time of study entry.
To determine the feasibility of the use of patient derived tumor cell models - molecular profiling to direct targeted therapies in the treatment of refractory solid tumors
At the time of study entry.
The success rate of patient derived tumor cell model establishment
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Duration of response
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-12-154

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on molecular profiling, patient derived cells

Subscribe