Study of the Intra-patient Variability of the Quantitative Parameters of Tumor Perfusion Evaluated With Ultrasound Contrast (VARIA-DCE-US)

RECIST criteria for evaluating tumor response are often inadequate for the evaluation of anti-angiogenic drugs. An evaluation model of tumor perfusion with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was developed at Gustave Roussy. It assesses the tumor vascular response through the analysis of 7 different parameters. Several studies (four at IGR, involving 117 patients, and a multicenter study involving 400 patients) showed that CEUS allows early evaluation of the effect of anti-angiogenic drugs. Two of these parameters are particularly interesting for the early identification of patients responding (or not) to treatment. Those are area under curve , and area under the wash-out. To further validate the use of these parameters, it is essential to measure and describe the level of their intra-patient variability.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Val de Marne
      • Villejuif, Val de Marne, France, 94805
        • Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient being treated at IGR for metastatic cancer by anti-angiogenic (s) drug (s) in the following indications:

    • Gastrointestinal sarcoma (GIST)
    • Breast Cancers
    • Kidney Cancers
    • Colorectal Cancers
    • Melanoma

    These anti-angiogenic drugs are used alone or in combination: Bevacizumab (Avastin), imatinib (Gleevec), Sorafenib (Nexavar), sunitinib (Sutent), Everolimus (Afinitor) Temsirolimus (Torisel), ... (non exhaustive list).

  2. With at least one clearly identified metastatic tumor lesion (and accessible to ultrasound for acquisition 3 minutes without losing the target), measuring more than 2 cm, less than 50% of the volume is necrotic.

    Metastatic lesions are:

    • Liver (30 patients)
    • Or outside the liver (30 patients)
  3. Physiological Age: 18-80 years
  4. performance status <2
  5. Patient information and signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Background known hypersensitivity to sulfur hexafluoride or one of the components,
  2. recent history of acute coronary syndrome or unstable ischemic heart disease,
  3. Acute heart failure, heart failure stage III or IV, or severe rhythm disorders,
  4. uncontrolled hypertension or severe pulmonary hypertension,
  5. Right-Left Shunt,
  6. Respiratory Distress Syndrome,
  7. Patient without vascularized tumor (without contrast enhancement)
  8. patient whose antiangiogenic has already started,
  9. Pregnant woman likely to be or breastfeeding,
  10. Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship,
  11. Unable to submit to medical monitoring of the trial for geographical, social or psychological reasons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with metastatic cancer treated with anti angiogenics
Each patient will be performed 2 contrast echocardiography (a pre-prandial - a post-prandial) before the antiangiogenic treatment, at D15 and D30.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variability of quantitative parameters of Tumor Perfusion Evaluated With Ultrasound Contrast
Time Frame: Assessed 30 days after inclusion
Demonstrate that for the hepatic metastatic sites and for non hepatic metastatic sites the variability of the measured quantitative parameters on two different perfusion curves is less than 30%
Assessed 30 days after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010-A01527-32
  • 2010/1703 (Other Identifier: CSET number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on GIST Metastatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on CEUS (Contrast-enhanced ultrasound)

3
Subscribe