A Policy Relevant US Trauma Care System Pragmatic Trial for PTSD and Comorbidity (TSOS6)

July 1, 2021 updated by: Douglas Zatzick, University of Washington
The overarching goal of this UH2-UH3 proposal is to work with the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory to develop and implement a large scale, cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial demonstration project that directly informs national trauma care system policy targeting injured patients with presentations of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and related comorbidity. Each year in the United States (US), over 30 million individuals present to trauma centers, emergency departments, and other acute care medical settings for the treatment of physical injuries. Multiple chronic conditions including enduring PTSD, alcohol and drug use problems, depression and associated suicidal ideation, pain and somatic symptom amplification, and chronic medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and pulmonary diseases) are endemic among physical trauma survivors with and without traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Evidence-based, collaborative care/care management treatment models for PTSD and related comorbidities exist. These care management models have the potential to be flexibly implemented in order to prevent the development of chronic PTSD and depressive symptoms, alcohol use problems, and enduring physical disability in survivors of both TBI and non-TBI injuries; care management models may also be effective in mitigating the impact of the acute injury event on symptom exacerbations in the large subpopulation of injury survivors who already carry a substantial pre-injury burden of multiple chronic medical conditions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Aims and Hypotheses

The primary aim of the UH3 period is to conduct a pragmatic randomized effectiveness trial of a collaborative care intervention targeting PTSD and comorbid conditions after acute care injury hospitalization. The investigation aims to determine if injured patients receiving the collaborative care intervention demonstrate significant reductions in PTSD symptoms when compared to control patients receiving care as usual. The study also aims to determine if the intervention patients when compared to control patients will demonstrate significant reductions in depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and alcohol use problems, and improvements in physical function. The primary hypothesis is that the intervention group when compared to the control group will demonstrate significant reductions in PTSD symptoms over the course of the year after injury. Secondary hypotheses are that intervention patients when compared to control patients will demonstrate, significant reductions in depressive symptoms, significant reductions in alcohol use problems, and improved post-injury physical function.

A Priori Secondary Analyses

The study team hypothesizes that a subgroup of patients will have persistent PTSD symptoms that will not remit over the longitudinal course of the investigation, regardless of randomization to intervention or control group conditions. The study team also anticipates that readily identifiable baseline clinical, injury and demographic characteristics will be associated with persistent PTSD symptoms over time (e.g., higher PTSD symptom levels, greater pre-injury trauma exposure, intentional injury including firearm related injury mechanisms and other characteristics such as unemployment, as well as other baseline factors). Derived from previous randomized clinical trials, a cumulative burden index has been developed from these baseline characteristics and will be adapted for the current investigation. The study team proposes a series of secondary analyses that adjust for and stratify by baseline characteristics that put patients at risk for persistent symptoms. It is hypothesized that these secondary analyses will identify a subgroup of intervention patients who are not at risk for persistent symptoms and who will demonstrate clinically and statistically significant treatment responses when compared to patients with similar baseline characteristics in the control condition. The study team also hypothesizes that the treatment effects will be greatest at the 1-6 month post-injury time points that are temporally correlated with the period of active intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

635

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85251
        • Honor Health
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Cedars Sinai
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • U.C. Davis
      • San Jose, California, United States, 95128
        • Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90509
        • U.C.L.A. Harbor
    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06102
        • Hartford Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Georgia Regents
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Eskenazi Health
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Louisiana State University
    • Minnesota
      • Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55101
        • Regions Hospital
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Jacobi Medical Center
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75204
        • Baylor Health Care System
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
        • University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • The University of Utah
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05405
        • The University of Vermont
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Inova Trauma Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53715
        • The University of Wisconsin Madison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient currently admitted to inpatient/emergency department for a traumatic injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Self-inflicted injury
  • Actively psychotic
  • Incarcerated or in custody
  • Less than 35 on PTSD Checklist
  • Less than 3 items on PTSD medical record screen
  • Less than 2 pieces of contact information

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
The intervention aims to prevent the development of chronic PTSD and depressive symptoms, alcohol use problems, and enduring physical disability in survivors of both traumatic brain injury(TBI) and non-TBI injuries. The intervention utilizes a computerized decision support tool to flexibly target these multiple conditions including and includes care management, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy elements, psychotropic drugs, and psychotherapy elements.
Anti-depressant
Anti-depressant
Anti-depressant
Anti-depressant
Anti-depressant
Anti-depressant
Anti-depressant
Anti-depressant
Sleep medication
Sleep medication
Sleep medication
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual Care
Enhanced standard care practices will be administered to this arm. This enhancement is sharing distressing emotional symptoms at recruitment with the attending nursing staff to address with patient subject.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
The investigators will use the PTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 17 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The measure can also provide a rating of symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
The investigators will use the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
The investigators will use the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a continuous measure. The 10-item scale score ranges from 0-40, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
The investigators used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form healthy survey (MOS SF-12/36) physical components summary to assess physical function. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scale assesses suicidal ideation. It is scored from 0 to 3, with a score of 1 or greater indicating a patient has suicidal ideation. Participants with a PHQ-9 item 9 score of greater than or equal to 1 are reported for this outcome.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Single items that assess non-prescribed opioid use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Cognitive Impairment Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
The investigators will use the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) Cognitive Screen, a 4 - Item Traumatic Brain Injury / Post-concussive Symptom Screen. The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 20, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
A brief measure scored on a 0 to 10 scale to assess a patient's pain, with a higher score indicating more severe pain; a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates very severe pain.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
SF-36 Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
The SF-36 assess quality of life domains that span emotional health, overall health status, and role function; a score of 100 indicates perfect health and a score of 0 indicates extremely poor health.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Satisfaction with health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Single items that assess non-prescribed stimulant use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Single items that assess marijuana use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.
Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month
Satisfaction with mental health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied.
Baseline, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20150987
  • UH3MH106338 (NIH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance-Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on Motivational Interviewing

Subscribe