Supporting Together Exercise and Play and Improving Nutrition (STEP IN)

Innovations in the Management of Obesity and Inactivity in Pediatric Primary Care

The purpose of this study is to design, pilot, and tweak a series of peer-led group nutrition sessions for primary care patients aged 6 -12 years who are overweight or obese and who want to eat healthier and be more active.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In addition to the group nutrition sessions, the investigators will give a Fitbit to each of a parent and child dyad, which will be used to track and motivate their activity. The investigators hypothesize an improvement pre-post in children's physical activity levels, self-efficacy and intentions for physical activity, self-reported consumption of fruits, vegetables, and child quality of life, and a decrease in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and fast and snack-food, and television (TV)/ videos screen time

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Pediatric Primary Care Center (PPC) Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose primary medical home is the Pediatric Primary Care Center (primarily Medicaid or self-pay)
  • BMI is greater than 85th%ile for age and sex
  • English speaking
  • have access to a computer/internet or a smart phone (for uploading Fitbit data)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have been seen in a weight management clinic within the last 2 years
  • prescribed an atypical antipsychotic
  • non-ambulatory

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Biweekly Arm
6 group nutrition sessions co-led by a peer and a content expert, Fitbit given to parent-child dyads during second session. Sessions took place biweekly.
The intervention will consist of 6 nutrition group sessions co-led by parent and a professional from the community who will rotate at each session. Group nutrition sessions will consist of a facilitated discussion of benefits and barriers to healthy eating, a short lesson led by the content expert, and a fun game or activity to reinforce the lesson. Three non-concurrent phases of the study will compare the efficacy of the group sessions when offered biweekly (Arm 1), monthly (Arm 2) and weekly (Arm 3).
Other Names:
  • Peer-led Group Sessions
Parent and child dyads will each receive a Fitbit Flex wearable device at the second session. This device will be used by participants and investigators to motivate and track participants' physical activity for up to 9 months.
Experimental: Monthly Arm
6 group nutrition sessions co-led by a peer and a content expert, Fitbit given to parent-child dyads during second session. Sessions took place monthly.
The intervention will consist of 6 nutrition group sessions co-led by parent and a professional from the community who will rotate at each session. Group nutrition sessions will consist of a facilitated discussion of benefits and barriers to healthy eating, a short lesson led by the content expert, and a fun game or activity to reinforce the lesson. Three non-concurrent phases of the study will compare the efficacy of the group sessions when offered biweekly (Arm 1), monthly (Arm 2) and weekly (Arm 3).
Other Names:
  • Peer-led Group Sessions
Parent and child dyads will each receive a Fitbit Flex wearable device at the second session. This device will be used by participants and investigators to motivate and track participants' physical activity for up to 9 months.
Experimental: Weekly
6 group nutrition sessions co-led by a peer and a content expert, Fitbit given to parent-child dyads during second session. Sessions took place weekly.
The intervention will consist of 6 nutrition group sessions co-led by parent and a professional from the community who will rotate at each session. Group nutrition sessions will consist of a facilitated discussion of benefits and barriers to healthy eating, a short lesson led by the content expert, and a fun game or activity to reinforce the lesson. Three non-concurrent phases of the study will compare the efficacy of the group sessions when offered biweekly (Arm 1), monthly (Arm 2) and weekly (Arm 3).
Other Names:
  • Peer-led Group Sessions
Parent and child dyads will each receive a Fitbit Flex wearable device at the second session. This device will be used by participants and investigators to motivate and track participants' physical activity for up to 9 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attendance
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Evaluation of participant attendance in each arm.
Baseline, 3 months
Overall Satisfaction With Group Nutrition Sessions
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Participants evaluated their satisfaction with the group sessions using a 5 point scale with a score of 1 being complete dissatisfaction and 5 being the greatest satisfaction.
Baseline, 3 months
Change From Baseline in Parent-report Child's Daily Servings of Fruits and Vegetables and Time Spent on Screens.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Data were not collected on any participants because we changed the study design based on qualitative participant feedback in pilot phases. Our asking participants about their habits, and showing them their data, was part of the intervention instead of an outcome to assess efficacy of the intervention.
Baseline, 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Measure Description: PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory) is a modular instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents ages 2 to 18. Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better Health-Related Quality of Life.
Baseline, 3 months
BMI Z-Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
BMI Z-scores compares child to age and sex matched peers. A z-score of 0 is the same as a 50th percentile in the reference population, a z-score of ± 1.0 plots at the 15th or 85th percentiles, respectively, and a z-score of ± 2 plots at roughly the 3rd or 97th percentiles. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the reference population whereas positive numbers indicate values higher than the reference population.
Baseline, 3 months
Number of Participants Reporting They Were Satisfied With the Group Nutrition Sessions (4 or 5 on 5-point Likert Scale)
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months
The description of the overall satisfaction variable is described in outcome #2 under primary outcomes.
baseline, 3 months
Child Self-efficacy Related to Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Self efficacy was assessed using a validated 14-item questionnaire using a 5-point Strongly Agree/ Strongly Disagree scale. The range of values is 1 to 5, with lower values indicating higher self-efficacy
Baseline, 3 months
Child Intention to be Active
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months
Child intention to be active was assessed with a 1-item questionnaire developed and validated by Saunders et al. This item uses a 5-point scale, with possible range of scores being 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater intention to be active.
baseline, 3 months
Change From Baseline in Parent-reported Number of Hours of Screen Time Child Watches Daily
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Data were not collected on any participants because we changed the study design based on qualitative participant feedback in pilot phases. Our asking participants about their habits, and showing them their data, was part of the intervention instead of an outcome to assess efficacy of the intervention.
Baseline, 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristen A Copeland, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-3406

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

This was a small, iterative feasibility study as a precursor to a larger clinical trial.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Group nutrition sessions

3
Subscribe