- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02751710
Impact of 18F-FDG PET-CT Versus Conventional Staging in the Management of Patients Presenting With Clinical Stage III Breast Cancer (PET ABC)
January 18, 2024 updated by: Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
This trial is being conducted to determine the impact of whole body FDG PET-CT vs. conventional staging in the management of patients presenting with clinical Stage III breast cancer.
Eligible consenting patients with ductal or mixed histology breast cancer will be randomized 1:1 to whole body FDG PET-CT or conventional staging.
Eligible consenting patients with lobular only histology will be entered into a separate single arm prospective study and will undergo whole body FDG PET-CT, CT with contrast of the chest/abdomen & pelvis and a bone scan.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
369
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8V 5C2
- Juravinski Cancer Centre
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4L6
- London Regional Cancer Program
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
- Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre
-
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, P7B 6V4
- Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women (or men) with histological evidence of breast cancer for whom potentially curative treatment is planned.
Based on clinical information (physical exam, imaging):
- Stage III breast cancer (T0N2, T1N2, T2N2, T3N1, 2 or T4), or
- Stage IIb breast cancer (T3N0), Note: T2N1 is not eligible
- Considered for combined modality therapy (surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) of curative intent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 years,
- ECOG performance status > and = 3,
- Prior systemic therapy (e.g. neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) for current breast cancer,
- Previous staging investigations for current breast cancer,
- Breast cancer with primary histological subtypes other than ductal or lobular (Note: Patients with mixed disease will be eligible for randomization),
- Clinical suspicion of metastatic disease,
- Relative contraindications to PET (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes (i.e. inability to decrease serum glucose below 10.2 mmol/L), claustrophobia, inability to be still for 30 minutes),
- Inability to lie supine for imaging with PET-CT,
- Inability to undergo CT because of known allergy to contrast,
- History of another invasive malignancy within the previous two years (exception of non melanoma skin cancer) or a synchronous primary cancer, including a synchronous contralateral breast cancer (Note: Patients found to have a contralateral breast cancer on study imaging following randomization will remain in the study),
- Known pregnancy or lactating female,
- Inability to complete the study or required follow-up.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Whole-body FDG PET-CT alone
|
FDG PET-CT imaging
|
|
No Intervention: Conventional breast cancer staging
Conventional breast cancer staging consisting of a bone scan and CT imaging with contrast of the chest / abdomen & pelvis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of patients upstaged to Stage IV disease
Time Frame: Within 30 days from date of randomization
|
Proportion of patients upstaged to Stage IV disease as a result of the imaging study, between the groups
|
Within 30 days from date of randomization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of patients who receive multimodal therapy of curative intent
Time Frame: Within 12 months from date of randomization
|
Within 12 months from date of randomization
|
|
|
Number of additional tests, such as imaging and biopsy, resulting from findings of study imaging
Time Frame: Within 12 months from date of randomization
|
Within 12 months from date of randomization
|
|
|
Prognostic ability of PET SUV of the primary lesion on the pathological response rate to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame: Within 12 months from date of randomization
|
Within 12 months from date of randomization
|
|
|
Disease Free Survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization to date of event, assessed up to 5 years
|
Objectively defined local or distance recurrence or death
|
From date of randomization to date of event, assessed up to 5 years
|
|
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization to date of event, assessed up to 5 years
|
Defined by all-cause mortality
|
From date of randomization to date of event, assessed up to 5 years
|
|
Incremental economic analysis comparing the costs and outcomes of the treatment arms
Time Frame: Within 5 years from date of randomization
|
Utility values will be collected using the EQ-5D Health Utility Questionnaire and converted to quality adjusted life years (QALYs) by considering Overall Survival.
Direct medical resources (i.e.
tests, complications, hospitalizations, clinic visits, emergency dept., etc.) will be obtained.
Costs ($CAN2016) for each resource identified and utilized will be determined.
Finally, an incremental cost-utility analysis will be calculated comparing the 2 randomized arms to generate an incremental cost per QALY outcome.
|
Within 5 years from date of randomization
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ur Metser, MD, Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
- Principal Investigator: Andrea Eisen, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
- Principal Investigator: Ian Dayes, MD, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre
- Principal Investigator: Ralph George, MD, St. Michael's Hospital, CIBC Breast Centre
- Study Director: Mark Levine, MD, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 6, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 31, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
March 31, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2016
First Posted (Estimated)
April 26, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 19, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 18, 2024
Last Verified
January 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OCOG-2016-PETABC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.