Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund- Glycemic Index (CogniDo GI) (CogniDo-GI)

The Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund (CogniDo) and the Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund PLUS (CogniDo PLUS) investigated the short-term effects of having school lunch versus skipping it on children's basal (CogniDo) and executive (CogniDo PLUS) cognitive functions in the afternoon. The The Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund Continued (Coco) connected this two previous studies and investigates the effect of having school lunch versus skipping it on children's basal and executive cognitive functions later in the afternoon. The present study the Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund- Glycemic Index (CogniDo GI) examines the influence of the gylcemic index of lunch on cognitive performance of school children in the afternoon.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Glucose is the main fuel of the human brain. However, which impact the glycemic index of lunch has on cognitive performance is not clear. A recently published review by Philippou and Constantinou suggested cautiously that a low-GI meal may favor cognitive functions in adults, but note that their findings are inconclusive due to differences in study design, study sample (e.g. size, age), time of testing and the cognitive domain being examined. Because of cerebral particularities, children may react highly sensitive to variations of glycose supply. Therefore, an optimised composition of meals at favourable mealtime should be considered for optimal cognitive performance. The increasing implementation of all-day schools in Germany requires the children's catering for lunch at school.

As prior intake of food can have an influence on the physiological effect of test meal, the children's dietary intake in the mid-morning is standardized. The intervention is integrated in everyday school life: 9.15 a.m. standardized snack within the frame of the regular break, 9.45 a.m. to 12.25 p.m. everyday school life, 12.25 p.m. lunch with a high GI-rice or a low GI-rice and a water beverage, 12.45 p.m. to 13.15 p.m. regular lunch break, 13.15 p.m. computerized tests of executive cognitive and basal (alertness) functioning.

Parameters of cognition with relevance to everyday school life are measured by a computerized test program developed by the Institute of Working Learning and Aging (ALA). Usual eating behaviour, sleep behaviour, physical activity and parental education were determined as control variables by questionnaires for children, parents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dortmund, Germany, 44225
        • Recruiting
        • Germany Research Institute of Child Nutrition
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all fifth and sixth grade students of Gesamtschule Berger Feld with the consent of parents and child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metabolic diseases or special diet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dietary: high GI lunch
High GI-rice lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and low GI-rice lunch on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.
High GI: High-GI rice lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and low GI-rice lunch on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.
Experimental: Dietary: low GI lunch
Low GI-rice lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and high GI-rice lunch on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.
Low-GI: Low GI-rice lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and high GI-rice lunch on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shifting: Change of total reaction time for a) [ms]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out

Measuring global task-switching costs by a three-part computer trial.

a. Non-switch: digits from 1 to 26 in random order are to put in order. b. Non-switch: Same as a) with letters from A to Z c. switch: digits 1 to 13 and letters A to M in random order to put in altering ascending order (digit, letter)

participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
Shifting: Change of total reaction time for b) [ms
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out

Measuring global task-switching costs by a three-part computer trial.

a. Non-switch: digits from 1 to 26 in random order are to put in order. b. Non-switch: Same as a) with letters from A to Z c. switch: digits 1 to 13 and letters A to M in random order to put in altering ascending order (digit, letter)

participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
Shifting: Change of total switch-costs [ms
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out

Measuring global task-switching costs by a three-part computer trial.

a. Non-switch: digits from 1 to 26 in random order are to put in order. b. Non-switch: Same as a) with letters from A to Z c. switch: digits 1 to 13 and letters A to M in random order to put in altering ascending order (digit, letter)

participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
updating: change of ratio of missing [%]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
Continuous monitoring and quick addition or deletion of contents within the working memory A sequence of 106 items (pictures of fruit and vegetables) is shown to the participants. A reaction is required if the actual shown item was equal to the item shown in the second to last.
participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
updating: change of ratio of false alarms [%]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
Continuous monitoring and quick addition or deletion of contents within the working memory A sequence of 106 items (pictures of fruit and vegetables) is shown to the participants. A reaction is required if the actual shown item was equal to the item shown in the second to last.
participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
updating: change of mean reaction time [ms]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
Continuous monitoring and quick addition or deletion of contents within the working memory A sequence of 106 items (pictures of fruit and vegetables) is shown to the participants. A reaction is required if the actual shown item was equal to the item shown in the second to last.
participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
tonic alertness: change of mean reaction time [ms]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
measures the level of alertness in response to a simple visual stimulus. Mean reaction time
participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
tonic alertness: change of deviation of reaction time [ms]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
measures the level of alertness in response to a simple visual stimulus. Deviation of reaction time
participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
tonic alertness:change of numbers of omission errors [n]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
measures the level of alertness in response to a simple visual stimulus. subsidiary outcome is the numbers of omission errors.
participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
tonic alertness:change of numbers of commission errors [n]
Time Frame: participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out
measures the level of alertness in response to a simple visual stimulus. subsidiary outcome is the numbers of comission errors.
participants were tested on two test days (T1 and T2) with one week wash out

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mathilde Kersting, Prof, Research Institut of Child Nutrition

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COG0416DO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Function

Clinical Trials on Dietary: high GI lunch

Subscribe