Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System - Android Devices User Performance Study Report

April 11, 2021 updated by: LabStyle Innovations Ltd.

Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System - Android Devices User Performance

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System as compared to a reference method (Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus) and to evaluate the usability of the device when used by laypersons.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objectives for this study are to evaluate the blood glucose level results obtained from the subject's fingertip using the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System paired with a reference device from one of three Android smart mobile device families as compared to the results from the Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus. The usability of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System when paired with a reference device from one of three Android smart mobile device families and used by laypersons is also evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Barbara Davis Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has Type 1 or Type II diabetes
  • Subject speaks and reads English proficiently
  • Subject is able and agrees to sign the informed consent form (minor subjects must be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian to provide consent for their participation in the study)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has medical training or works in the field of blood glucose monitoring systems.
  • Subject is critically ill.
  • Subject has an impairment that prevents him/her from following the study procedures.
  • Subject has any condition that the Principal Investigator believes may interfere in the subject's participation in the study.
  • Hematocrit levels outside the range of 20%-60%.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: One Arm
This is a comparative diagnostic study, no interventional actions are being taken.
Accuracy with usability assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of Glucose Concentrations (%)
Time Frame: 1 Day

Accuracy acceptability is defined as follows:

Ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results shall fall within +/-15 mg/dL of the results of the Dario's measurement at glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL and within +/- 20% at glucose concentrations greater than or equal to 75 mg/dL.

The accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System when used with Android operating system smart mobile devices was assessed against the Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus.

1 Day
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Would Rate Your Success in Operating Dario BGMS"
Time Frame: 1 Day

Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-completely fails, 2-unsuccessful, 3-Partially successful, 4-successful, 5-very successful.

Average rank of 3.5 ('average'/'successful') or above in question #2 - How would you rate your success in operating Dario™ BGMS?

1 Day
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Easy Was it to Operate the Dario™ BGMS on the First Time?"
Time Frame: 1 Day

Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-very hard, 2-hard, 3-average, 4-easy, 5-very easy.

An average rank of 3 ('average') or above in question #3 - How easy was it to operate the Dario™ BGMS on the first time?

1 Day
Percent of Participants Responding 'YES' on the Question "Did You Successfully Obtain Measurement Result Using the Dario™ BGMS?"
Time Frame: 1 Day

The acceptance criteria for this question is: at least ninety percent (90%) need to answer 'Yes' on question #1 - Did you successfully obtain measurement result using the Dario™ BGMS?

100% of subjects (102 of 102) answered "Yes" to this question.

1 Day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CP-0004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System

3
Subscribe